IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i10p584-d1772144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting Manipulation and Value Creation: An Empirical Study of EVA and Accounting Quality in NYSE and NASDAQ Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Szilárd Hegedűs

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Finance and Accountancy, Budapest University of Economics and Business, 1149 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ervin Denich

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Finance and Accountancy, Budapest University of Economics and Business, 1149 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Áron Lajos Baracsi

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Finance and Accountancy, Budapest University of Economics and Business, 1149 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Accounting manipulation undermines the integrity of financial reporting and can distort key performance indicators, yet its quantitative effects on accounting quality (AQ) and value-related metrics remain underexplored. This study analyses U.S. publicly traded firms involved in accounting manipulation between 2017 and 2019, comparing them with matched non-manipulative industry peers to assess differences in AQ. It also examines potential links between manipulation-related AQ distortions and changes in Economic Value Added (EVA), stock prices, trading volumes, and dividend payouts. The sample includes 57 manipulation-affected firms and 57 matched controls, identified through SEC enforcement filings and the Violation Tracker database. Financial and stock data were sourced from EDGAR, ORBIS, and Morningstar. AQ was measured using discretionary accruals estimated via the Kasznik model. Correlation analysis tested associations between AQ and the selected performance indicators. Results show that firms involved in accounting manipulations had significantly lower AQ than their peers. However, no consistent correlations were found between AQ and EVA, dividends, stock prices, or volumes during the manipulation period. These findings suggest that the performance effects of manipulations are case-specific and shaped by additional factors, underscoring the importance of strong regulatory oversight and high-quality accounting practices. Ethically, our evidence underscores that misreporting corrodes investor trust and the public-interest mandate of financial reporting; accordingly, we stress the duties of boards, executives, auditors, and regulators to uphold faithful representation and timely disclosure, and to remediate misreporting when detected.

Suggested Citation

  • Szilárd Hegedűs & Ervin Denich & Áron Lajos Baracsi, 2025. "Accounting Manipulation and Value Creation: An Empirical Study of EVA and Accounting Quality in NYSE and NASDAQ Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-33, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:584-:d:1772144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/10/584/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/10/584/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgiana Burlacu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Ionela Munteanu, 2024. "Exploring the Influence of Earnings Management on the Value Relevance of Financial Statements: Evidence from the Bucharest Stock Exchange," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Lonwabo Mlawu & Frank Ranganai Matenda & Mabutho Sibanda, 2025. "Incentives for Accrual-Based Earnings Management in Emerging Economies—A Systematic Literature Review with Bibliometric Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-41, May.
    3. Karpoff, Jonathan M. & Lee, D. Scott & Martin, Gerald S., 2008. "The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 581-611, September.
    4. Andra M. ACHIM & Anca O. CHIŞ, 2014. "Financial Accounting Quality And Its Defining Characteristics," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 5, pages 93-98, November.
    5. Jody Grewal & Edward J. Riedl & George Serafeim, 2019. "Market Reaction to Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3061-3084, July.
    6. Yuanzhan Chen & Zhuo Jin & Bo Qin, 2023. "Economic Value Added in performance measurement: A simulation approach and empirical evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 109-140, March.
    7. Kerry Anne Bodle & Patti J. Cybinski & Reza Monem, 2016. "Effect of IFRS adoption on financial reporting quality," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(3), pages 292-312, September.
    8. Martin Kapons & Peter Kelly & Robert Stoumbos & Rafael Zambrana, 2023. "Dividends, trust, and firm value," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1354-1387, September.
    9. Kerry Anne Bodle & Patti J. Cybinski & Reza Monem, 2016. "Effect of IFRS adoption on financial reporting quality," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(3), pages 292-312, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pak Hung Au & Yuk‐Fai Fong & Jin Li, 2020. "Negotiated Block Trade And Rebuilding Of Trust," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(2), pages 901-939, May.
    2. Salman Arif & John D. Kepler & Joseph Schroeder & Daniel Taylor, 2022. "Audit process, private information, and insider trading," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1125-1156, September.
    3. Wu, Fang & Cao, June & Zhang, Xiaosan, 2023. "Do non-executive employees matter in curbing corporate financial fraud?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Ararat, Melsa & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2021. "Female directors, board committees, and firm performance: Time-series evidence from Turkey," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    5. Wang, Tracy Yue & Winton, Andrew, 2021. "Industry informational interactions and corporate fraud," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Lu Zhang & Yuan George Shan & Millicent Chang, 2021. "Can CSR Disclosure Protect Firm Reputation During Financial Restatements?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 157-184, September.
    7. Curtis Nicholls, 2016. "The impact of SEC investigations and accounting and auditing enforcement releases on firms’ cost of equity capital," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 57-82, July.
    8. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Audit Fees," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 59-87.
    9. Alexander Dyck & Adair Morse & Luigi Zingales, 2024. "How pervasive is corporate fraud?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 736-769, March.
    10. Su, Yueying & Li, Jialong & Li, Zhicheng & Wu, Cathy, 2025. "CEO inside debt holdings and climate risk concerns in corporate acquisition," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Özgür, Arslan-Ayaydin & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Earnings Management Methods and CEO Political Affiliation," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021017, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    12. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Didier Cossin & Alfredo De Massis & Hongze (Abraham) Lu, 2023. "Wrongdoing in Publicly Listed Family- and Nonfamily-Owned Firms: A Behavioral Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1233-1264, July.
    13. James Malm & Marcin Krolikowski, 2017. "Litigation risk and financial leverage," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 41(1), pages 180-194, January.
    14. Malm, James & Soyeh, Kenneth W. & Kanuri, Srinidhi, 2023. "Litigation risk and corporate performance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    15. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2024. "How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Ahsan Habib & Mabel D' Costa & Hedy Jiaying Huang & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan & Li Sun, 2020. "Determinants and consequences of financial distress: review of the empirical literature," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 1023-1075, April.
    17. Badolato, Patrick G. & Donelson, Dain C. & Ege, Matthew, 2014. "Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 208-230.
    18. Marc Berninger, 2024. "Changes in the Perception of Error Announcements from the German Two-Tier Enforcement," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 613-639, December.
    19. Nan Hu & Xingnan Xue & Ling Liu, 2022. "The impact of air pollution on financial reporting quality: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3609-3644, September.
    20. Arena, Matteo P. & Ferris, Stephen P., 2018. "A global analysis of corporate litigation risk and costs," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 28-41.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:584-:d:1772144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.