IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i3p159-d1084600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dissecting the Explanatory Power of ESG Features on Equity Returns by Sector, Capitalization, and Year with Interpretable Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémi Assael

    (MICS Laboratory, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
    BNP Paribas Corporate & Institutional Banking, Global Markets Data & Artificial Intelligence Lab, 75009 Paris, France)

  • Laurent Carlier

    (BNP Paribas Corporate & Institutional Banking, Global Markets Data & Artificial Intelligence Lab, 75009 Paris, France)

  • Damien Challet

    (MICS Laboratory, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France)

Abstract

We systematically investigate the links between price returns and Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) scores in the European equity market. Using interpretable machine learning, we examine whether ESG scores can explain the part of price returns not accounted for by classic equity factors, especially the market one. We propose a cross-validation scheme with random company-wise validation to mitigate the relative initial lack of quantity and quality of ESG data, which allows us to use most of the latest and best data to both train and validate our models. Gradient boosting models successfully explain the part of annual price returns not accounted for by the market factor. We check with benchmark features that ESG data explain significantly better price returns than basic fundamental features alone. The most relevant ESG score encodes controversies. Finally, we find the opposite effects of better ESG scores on the price returns of small and large capitalization companies: better ESG scores are generally associated with larger price returns for the latter and reversely for the former.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémi Assael & Laurent Carlier & Damien Challet, 2023. "Dissecting the Explanatory Power of ESG Features on Equity Returns by Sector, Capitalization, and Year with Interpretable Machine Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:159-:d:1084600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/3/159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/3/159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Hilario-Caballero & A. Garcia-Bernabeu & J. V. Salcedo & M. Vercher, 2020. "Tri-criterion model for constructing low-carbon mutual fund portfolios: a preference-based multi-objective genetic algorithm approach," Papers 2006.11888, arXiv.org.
    2. Marc Schmitt, 2022. "Deep Learning vs. Gradient Boosting: Benchmarking state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for credit scoring," Papers 2205.10535, arXiv.org.
    3. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    4. Adolfo Hilario-Caballero & Ana Garcia-Bernabeu & Jose Vicente Salcedo & Marisa Vercher, 2020. "Tri-Criterion Model for Constructing Low-Carbon Mutual Fund Portfolios: A Preference-Based Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Ook Lee & Hanseon Joo & Hayoung Choi & Minjong Cheon, 2022. "Proposing an Integrated Approach to Analyzing ESG Data via Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Tian Guo & Nicolas Jamet & Valentin Betrix & Louis-Alexandre Piquet & Emmanuel Hauptmann, 2020. "ESG2Risk: A Deep Learning Framework from ESG News to Stock Volatility Prediction," Papers 2005.02527, arXiv.org.
    7. Michael Cappucci, 2018. "The ESG Integration Paradox," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 30(2), pages 22-28, June.
    8. Carmine de Franco & Christophe Geissler & Vincent Margot & Bruno Monnier, 2020. "ESG investments: Filtering versus machine learning approaches," Papers 2002.07477, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    9. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    10. Vincent Margot & Christophe Geissler & Carmine de Franco & Bruno Monnier, 2021. "ESG Investments: Filtering versus Machine Learning Approaches," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeremi Assael & Thibaut Heurtebize & Laurent Carlier & François Soupé, 2023. "Greenhouse gases emissions: estimating corporate non-reported emissions using interpretable machine learning," Working Papers hal-03905325, HAL.
    2. Jérémi Assael & Thibaut Heurtebize & Laurent Carlier & François Soupé, 2023. "Greenhouse Gases Emissions: Estimating Corporate Non-Reported Emissions Using Interpretable Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Jeremi Assael & Thibaut Heurtebize & Laurent Carlier & Franc{c}ois Soup'e, 2022. "Greenhouse gases emissions: estimating corporate non-reported emissions using interpretable machine learning," Papers 2212.10844, arXiv.org.
    4. Michele Costa, 2023. "The evaluation of the effects of ESG scores on financial markets," Working Papers wp1189, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeremi Assael & Laurent Carlier & Damien Challet, 2022. "Dissecting the explanatory power of ESG features on equity returns by sector, capitalization, and year with interpretable machine learning," Working Papers hal-03791538, HAL.
    2. Tan, Yafei & Zhu, Zhaohui, 2022. "The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.
    4. Giovanni Cardillo & Ennio Bendinelli & Giuseppe Torluccio, 2023. "COVID‐19, ESG investing, and the resilience of more sustainable stocks: Evidence from European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 602-623, January.
    5. Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Chasing the ESG factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Darren D. Lee & John Hua Fan & Victor S. H. Wong, 2021. "No more excuses! Performance of ESG‐integrated portfolios in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2407-2450, April.
    7. Lars Kaiser, 2020. "ESG integration: value, growth and momentum," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, February.
    8. Paolo Capelli & Federica Ielasi & Angeloantonio Russo, 2021. "Forecasting volatility by integrating financial risk with environmental, social, and governance risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1483-1495, September.
    9. Isil Erol & Umut Unal & Yener Coskun, 2021. "ESG Investing and the Financial Performance: A Panel Data Analysis of Developed REIT Markets," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202123, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    10. Chang Liu & Bowen Deng, 2023. "Is it really paid for sustainable development? The economic significance of firms' green practice," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 908-925, April.
    11. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Maretno A. Harjoto & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Marcus A. Nilsson, 2022. "Bondholders’ returns and stakeholders’ interests," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1271-1301, November.
    13. Heying Liu & Chan Lyu, 2022. "Can ESG Ratings Stimulate Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Maria Cristina Zaccone & Matteo Pedrini, 2020. "ESG Factor Integration into Private Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Yeong Sheng Tey & Mark Brindal, 2021. "Sustainability stewardship: Does roundtable on sustainable palm oil certification create shareholder value?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 786-795, March.
    16. Dan Daugaard, 2020. "Emerging new themes in environmental, social and governance investing: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 1501-1530, June.
    17. Gianpaolo Iazzolino & Maria Elena Bruni & Stefania Veltri & Donato Morea & Giovanni Baldissarro, 2023. "The impact of ESG factors on financial efficiency: An empirical analysis for the selection of sustainable firm portfolios," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1917-1927, July.
    18. Ford, Jansson M. & Gehricke, Sebastian A. & Zhang, Jin E., 2022. "Option traders are concerned about climate risks: ESG ratings and short-term sentiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    19. Hong Zhao & Zixuan Jiao & Jianrong Wang & Amina Kamar, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Liquidity Risk: U.S. Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Mustafa K. Yilmaz & Mine Aksoy & Ekrem Tatoglu, 2020. "Does the Stock Market Value Inclusion in a Sustainability Index? Evidence from Borsa Istanbul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:159-:d:1084600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.