IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i7p323-d593201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Implications for the Role of Budgets in Implementing Post-Acquisition Systems Integration Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Nazila Razi

    (Faculty of Postgraduate Accounting, King’s Own Institute, Sydney 2000, Australia)

  • Elizabeth More

    (Chief Academic Office, Study Group, Sydney 2010, Australia)

  • Gensheng Shen

    (King’s Own Institute, Sydney 2000, Australia)

Abstract

This paper studies the role of budgets in implementing the systems integration strategies in an Australian post-acquisition case of two organisations and reducing its associated often-regarded high risks. It attempts a fresh narrative approach to examine the evolution of accounting and its effects on the challenges of post-acquisition integration processes by using the performative approach such as the sociotechnical networks of Actor Network Theory in a broader analytical framework as a possible solution to reducing the risks inherent in systems integration. The methodology of the case study is based on Callon’s model of Four-Moment translation where integration strategy and budgets are regarded as social practice and defined relationally as bundles of activities and take form in and through practice and interaction between diverse actors and actants. A qualitative approach is adopted in the examination of the systems integration networks in an Australian post-acquisition case. Data was collected and analysed using semi-structured interviews. It was found, through the examination of the routine practices of systems integration strategy making and how people enact and draw on a certain financial report on a daily basis to perform systems integration network strategies, that material forms of accounting act as a powerful structuring and inscription tool in integration activities, thus shaping integration strategic options and post-acquisition economic conditions of the organisation. The result shows how the risk could be reduced in the post-acquisition system integration. The research contributes to the risk, change, and accounting literatures by providing insights into the mundane and ordinary practices of different aspects of integration strategy making, and the way employees enact and draw on accounting numbers on a day-to-day basis to perform systems integration network strategies. This case study facilities this research to be further developed and broadened in terms of other cases, industries, and countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazila Razi & Elizabeth More & Gensheng Shen, 2021. "Risk Implications for the Role of Budgets in Implementing Post-Acquisition Systems Integration Strategies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:323-:d:593201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lise Justesen & Jan Mouritsen, 2011. "Effects of actor‐network theory in accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 161-193, February.
    2. Pasi Aaltola, 2019. "Strategic thinking and accounting: potentials and pitfalls from a managerial perspective," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 323-351, October.
    3. Yazdifar, Hassan & Zaman, Mahbub & Tsamenyi, Mathew & Askarany, Davood, 2008. "Management accounting change in a subsidiary organisation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 404-430.
    4. Audrey Rouziès & Helene Loe Colman & Duncan Angwin, 2019. "Recasting the dynamics of post-acquisition integration: An embeddedness perspective," Post-Print hal-02281788, HAL.
    5. David R. King & Dan R. Dalton & Catherine M. Daily & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2004. "Meta‐analyses of post‐acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 187-200, February.
    6. Hüseyin Tanriverdi & Vahap Bülent Uysal, 2011. "Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 703-720, December.
    7. Christina Boedker, 2010. "Ostensive versus performative approaches for theorising accounting‐strategy research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 595-625, June.
    8. Chua, Wai Fong, 2007. "Accounting, measuring, reporting and strategizing - Re-using verbs: A review essay," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 487-494.
    9. Audrey Rouzies & Helene Loe Colman & Duncan Angwin, 2019. "Recasting the dynamics of post-acquisition integration: An embeddedness perspective," Post-Print hal-03279580, HAL.
    10. Sinikka Moilanen, 2016. "Sensemaking of post-acquisition changes in accounting and control," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 24-42, February.
    11. E. Pieter Jansen, 2018. "Bridging the gap between theory and practice in management accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 1486-1509, June.
    12. Jones, C. S., 1985. "An empirical study of the role of management accounting systems following takeover or merger," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 177-200, April.
    13. G. Capece & Di Pillo Francesca & N. Levialdi & G. Perrotta, 2017. "Understanding How the Strategic Similarities between Energy Companies Influence the Post-mergers and Acquisitions Performances," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 78-89.
    14. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    15. Donald MacKenzie, 2006. "An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262134608, December.
    16. Burchell, Stuart & Clubb, Colin & Hopwood, Anthony & Hughes, John & Nahapiet, Janine, 1980. "The roles of accounting in organizations and society," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 5-27, January.
    17. James Guthrie & Lee D. Parker, 2017. "Reflections and projections," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 2-17, January.
    18. Roberts, John, 1990. "Strategy and accounting in a U.K. conglomerate," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 107-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skærbæk, Peter & Tryggestad, Kjell, 2010. "The role of accounting devices in performing corporate strategy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 108-124, January.
    2. Englund, Hans & Gerdin, Jonas & Burns, John, 2011. "25 Years of Giddens in accounting research: Achievements, limitations and the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 494-513.
    3. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    4. Jørgensen, Brian & Messner, Martin, 2010. "Accounting and strategising: A case study from new product development," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 184-204, February.
    5. van Erp, Wil & Roozen, Frans & Vosselman, Ed, 2019. "The performativity of a management accounting and control system: Exploring the dynamic relational consequences of a design," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    6. Roberts, John, 2014. "Testing the limits of structuration theory in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 135-141.
    7. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Degischer, Daniel, 2022. "Contextualizing deliberate learning from acquisitions: The role of organizational and target contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 194-207.
    8. Erhart, Raphaela & Mahlendorf, Matthias D. & Reimer, Marko & Schäffer, Utz, 2017. "Theorizing and testing bidirectional effects: The relationship between strategy formation and involvement of controllers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 36-52.
    9. Verdier, Marie-Anne & Boutant Lapeyre, Jennifer, 2023. "The myth of workforce reduction efficiency: The performativity of accounting language," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Sanna Hilden & Kati Tikkamäki, 2013. "Reflective Practice as a Fuel for Organizational Learning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Carmona, Salvador & Ezzamel, Mahmoud & Gutierrez, Fernando, 1997. "Control and cost accounting practices in the Spanish Royal Tobacco Factory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 411-446, July.
    12. Boedker, Christina & Chong, Kar-Ming & Mouritsen, Jan, 2020. "The counter-performativity of calculative practices: Mobilising rankings of intellectual capital," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Kastberg, Gustaf, 2014. "Framing shared services," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 743-756.
    14. Baxter, Jane & Chua, Wai Fong, 2003. "Alternative management accounting research--whence and whither," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 97-126.
    15. Bogt, H.J. ter, 2006. "New public management and management changes in Dutch local government: some recent experiences and future topics," Research Report 06D04, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Ahrens, Thomas & Mollona, Massimiliano, 2007. "Organisational control as cultural practice--A shop floor ethnography of a Sheffield steel mill," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 305-331.
    17. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Anderson, Shannon W. & Nair, Sujay & Jiang, Yile (Anson), 2021. "Manager ‘growth mindset’ and resource management practices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Robert Rieg, 2018. "Tasks, interaction and role perception of management accountants: evidence from Germany," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 183-220, August.
    19. Xu, Wen & Uddin, Shahzad, 2008. "Public sector reforms, privatisation and regimes of control in a Chinese enterprise," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 162-177.
    20. Dominique Barbelivien & François Meyssonnier, 2016. "La structuration du contrôle de gestion dans trois ETI familiales et industrielles," Post-Print hal-01901076, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:323-:d:593201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.