IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i4p191-d1771392.html

Impact of ESG Preferences on Investors in China’s A-Share Market

Author

Listed:
  • Yihan Sun

    (School of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China)

  • Diyang Jiao

    (School of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China)

  • Yiqu Yang

    (School of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China)

  • Yumeng Peng

    (School of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China)

  • Sang Hu

    (School of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China)

Abstract

This study explores the time-varying influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors on asset pricing in China’s A-share market from 2017 to 2023, integrating investor heterogeneity categorized as ESG-unaware (Type-U), ESG-aware (Type-A), and ESG-motivated (Type-M). taxonomy. It adopts a linear regression model with seven control variables (including firm systematic risk, asset turnover ratio, and ownership concentration) to quantify ESG’s marginal effect on stock returns. Annual regressions (2017–2022) reveal distinct ESG coefficient shifts: insignificant negative coefficients in 2017–2018, significantly positive coefficients in 2019–2020, and significantly negative coefficients in 2021–2022. Heterogeneity analysis across five non-financial industries (Utilities, Properties, Conglomerates, Industrials, Commerce) shows industry-specific ESG effects. Portfolio performance tests using 2023 data (stocks divided into eight ESG groups) indicate that portfolios with medium ESG scores outperform high/low ESG portfolios and the traditional mean-variance model in risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio) and volatility control, avoiding poor governance risks (low ESG) and excessive ESG resource allocation issues (high ESG). Overall, policy shocks and institutional maturation transformed the market from ESG indifference to ESG-motivated pricing within a decade, offering insights for stakeholders in emerging ESG markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yihan Sun & Diyang Jiao & Yiqu Yang & Yumeng Peng & Sang Hu, 2025. "Impact of ESG Preferences on Investors in China’s A-Share Market," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:191-:d:1771392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/4/191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/4/191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Xudong & Zhu, Hao & Meng, Yiqun, 2023. "ESG greenwashing and equity mispricing: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).
    2. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Post-Print halshs-02007374, HAL.
    3. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    4. Loan T. Le, 2024. "Impact of environmental, social and governance practices on financial performance: evidence from listed companies in Southeast Asia," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2379568-237, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shakil, Mohammad Hassan, 2024. "Environmental, social and governance controversies: A bibliometric review and research agenda," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Gong, Qi & Kong, Zhaoyang & Li, Liang & Dong, Xiucheng & Li, Yang, 2026. "The consequences of hypocrisy: how ESG greenwashing undermines green total factor productivity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Hung Manh Pham & Nham Linh Vuong & Dung Viet Tran & Minh Thi Hai Ngo & Trung Tien Le, 2025. "Does environmental, social, and governance disclosure affect financial performance? An empirical study of Southeast and East Asia commercial banks," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    5. Tian, Xiangyu & Ye, Xiaoyu, 2026. "How supply chain finance impacts ESG synergy across supply chains," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Satish Kumar & Avinash Ghalke, 2025. "ESG Performance and Dividend Payout: The Moderating Role of ESG Controversies and Legal Systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 7210-7227, September.
    7. Muneer Shaik & Mohd Ziaur Rehman, 2023. "The Dynamic Volatility Connectedness of Major Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Stock Indices: Evidence Based on DCC-GARCH Model," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 30(1), pages 231-246, March.
    8. Raffaela Casciello & Rosalinda Santonastaso & Martina Prisco & Ilaria Martino, 2024. "Green innovation and financial performance. The role of R&D investments and ESG disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5372-5390, November.
    9. Galletta, Simona & Goodell, John W. & Mazzù, Sebastiano & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2025. "The impact of environmental disclosure and controversies on bank value," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 134.
    10. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    11. Denny IRAWAN & Tatsuyoshi OKIMOTO, 2021. "How Do ESG Performance and Awareness Affect Firm Value and Corporate Overinvestment?," Discussion papers 21033, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    12. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Nadine Gatzert & Philipp Reichel, 2022. "Awareness of climate risks and opportunities: empirical evidence on determinants and value from the U.S. and European insurance industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-26, January.
    14. Mirza, Nawazish & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Ha Nguyen, Thi Thu & Arfaoui, Nadia & Oliyide, Johnson A., 2023. "Are sustainable investments interdependent? The international evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Md Ismail Haidar, 2025. "Does Societal Trust Reduce Greenwashing? International Evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3400-3424, March.
    16. Tan, Yafei & Zhu, Zhaohui, 2022. "The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Valentina Marano & Steve Sauerwald & Marc Essen, 2022. "The influence of culture on the relationship between women directors and corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1315-1342, September.
    18. Yu Meng & Maoyong Cheng, 2025. "Leadership Power: The Absence of Political Incentives and ESG Performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(5), pages 4446-4472, December.
    19. Shiyu Wu & Xinyi Li & Xiaosen Du & Zexin Li, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Clementino, Ester & Perkins, Richard, 2020. "How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103046, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:191-:d:1771392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.