IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p3935-d1077351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia

Author

Listed:
  • Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta

    (Primary Care Management of Tenerife, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain)

  • Alfonso-Miguel García-Hernández

    (Department of Nursing, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

  • Jonathan Delgado-Hernández

    (CREN Specialist Rehabilitation Centre, 38296 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

  • Estela Sainz-Fregel

    (Primary Care Management of Tenerife, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain)

  • Raquel-Candelaria Miranda-Martín

    (Primary Care Management of Tenerife, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38400 Puerto de la Cruz, Spain)

  • Alejandra Suárez-Pérez

    (Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

  • Alejandra Jiménez-Álvarez

    (Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

  • Elena Martín-Felipe

    (Neurology Department, Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria University Hospital, The Canary Islands Health Service, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain)

  • Pedro-Ruymán Brito-Brito

    (Training and Research in Care, Primary Care Management Board of Tenerife, The Canary Islands Health Service, Department of Nursing, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain)

Abstract

(1) Background: The CEECCA questionnaire assesses the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. It was designed using the NANDA-I and NOC standardised nursing languages (SNLs), reaching high content validity index and representativeness index values. The questionnaire was pilot-tested, demonstrating its feasibility for use by nurses in any healthcare setting. This study aims to identify the psychometric properties of this instrument. (2) Methods: 47 individuals with aphasia were recruited from primary and specialist care facilities. The instrument was tested for construct validity and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness. The NANDA-I and NOC SNLs and the Boston test were used for criterion validity testing. (3) Results: five language dimensions explained 78.6% of the total variance. Convergent criterion validity tests showed concordances of up to 94% (Cohen’s κ : 0.9; p < 0.001) using the Boston test, concordances of up to 81% using DCs of NANDA-I diagnoses (Cohen’s κ : 0.6; p < 0.001), and concordances of up to 96% (Cohen’s κ : 0.9; p < 0.001) using NOC indicators. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.98. Reliability tests revealed test–retest concordances of 76–100% ( p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: the CEECCA is an easy-to-use, valid, and reliable instrument to assess the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia.

Suggested Citation

  • Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta & Alfonso-Miguel García-Hernández & Jonathan Delgado-Hernández & Estela Sainz-Fregel & Raquel-Candelaria Miranda-Martín & Alejandra Suárez-Pérez & Alejandra Jiménez-Álvarez , 2023. "Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3935-:d:1077351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3935/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3935/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juliana Thompson & Margo Mckeever, 2014. "The impact of stroke aphasia on health and well‐being and appropriate nursing interventions: an exploration using the Theory of Human Scale Development," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 410-420, February.
    2. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea C Vial & Janine Bosak & Patrick C Flood & John F Dovidio, 2021. "Individual variation in role construal predicts responses to third-party biases in hiring contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp & Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp & Theeranuch Pusaksrikit & Pimmada Wichasin & Vikas Kumar, 2021. "Co-Creating a Sustainable Regional Brand from Multiple Sub-Brands: The Andaman Tourism Cluster of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Bangyi Yan & Shiguang Ni & Xi Wang & Jin Liu & Qianjing Zhang & Kaiping Peng, 2020. "Using Virtual Reality to Validate the Chinese Version of the Independent Television Commission-Sense of Presence Inventory," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    4. Christoph, Inken B. & Roosen, Jutta & Bruhn, Maike, 2006. "Willingness to pay for genetically modified food and non-food products," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21303, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    6. Marcin Chlebus, 2014. "One-day prediction of state of turbulence for financial instrument based on models for binary dependent variable," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    7. Faheem Ahmed & Luiz Fernando Capretz, 2011. "A business maturity model of software product line engineering," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 543-560, September.
    8. Libin Yang & William Rea & Alethea Rea, 2015. "How much diversification potential is there in a single market? Evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange," Working Papers in Economics 15/07, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    9. Ben-Shahar, Danny & Golan, Roni, 2014. "Real estate and personality," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 111-119.
    10. Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David & Grueso, Merlin Patricia, 2017. "Factor analysis evaluation of Schein's career orientation inventory in Colombia," OSF Preprints jf5nq, Center for Open Science.
    11. Belén Casales Morici, 2022. "Strategic corporate entrepreneurship practices in financial services firms: the role of organizational factors," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    13. Ye, Shi & Chen, Qun & Tang, Yi, 2023. "Anger between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers: Development of a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Alessandro Bitetto & Paola Cerchiello & Charilaos Mertzanis, 2021. "A data-driven approach to measuring epidemiological susceptibility risk around the world," DEM Working Papers Series 200, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    15. Giorgio Calcagnini & Francesco Perugini, 2019. "A Well-Being Indicator for the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 149-177, February.
    16. Shashi & Rajwinder Singh & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2018. "Evaluating Partnerships in Sustainability-Oriented Food Supply Chain: A Five-Stage Performance Measurement Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Jasna Mesarić & Diana Šimić & Milica Katić & Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås & Dag Hofoss & Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik, 2020. "The safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare—Psychometric properties of the Croatian version," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Francisco B. Galarza & Joanna Kámiche Zegarra & Rosario Gómez, 2023. "Roads and Deforestation: Do Local Institutions Matter?," Working Papers 192, Peruvian Economic Association.
    19. Koroseczné Pavlin Rita & Parádi-Dolgos Anett & Koponicsné Györke Diána, 2019. "The effects of employment policy measures on the labour demand of persons with changed working abilities," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 37-46, December.
    20. Fabia Morales-Vives & Jorge-Manuel Dueñas & Pere J Ferrando & Andreu Vigil-Colet & Maria Dolores Varea, 2022. "COmpliance with pandemic COmmands Scale (COCOS): The relationship between compliance with COVID-19 measures and sociodemographic and attitudinal variables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3935-:d:1077351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.