IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2029-d1044027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Digital Medicine in a Virtual Classroom: Impacts on Student Mindset and Competencies

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Nitsche

    (Department of Didactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany)

  • Theresa S. Busse

    (Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Jan P. Ehlers

    (Department of Didactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany)

Abstract

Digital competencies, as well as knowledge about digital medicine, are becoming increasingly relevant but are rarely reflected in teaching concepts at universities. One reason for this is probably the fact that they are not yet part of the curricula in many areas or countries (such as medicine in Germany). Therefore, courses that address digital competencies and intend to impart knowledge about digital medicine are not subject to any curricular specifications and have a correspondingly broad range of possible designs. This article reports findings from an investigation on an interdisciplinary and cross-faculty course on digital medicine. An online questionnaire was used to assess student attitudes toward digital medicine topics and conduct self-assessments of their digital competencies before and after the course. The aim of this study was to test whether such a course could influence students’ attitudes and competencies. Group comparisons revealed statistically significant changes. They proved that the described course and its content regarding digital transformation in healthcare and digital medicine had an impact on digital competencies and participant opinions on digital topics. In order to teach students important competencies for the 21st century, universities should offer more courses that address digital transformation and support students in improving their competencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Nitsche & Theresa S. Busse & Jan P. Ehlers, 2023. "Teaching Digital Medicine in a Virtual Classroom: Impacts on Student Mindset and Competencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2029-:d:1044027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tammy Harris & James W. Hardin, 2013. "Exact Wilcoxon signed-rank and Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney ranksum tests," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(2), pages 337-343, June.
    2. Heiko Sorg & Jan P. Ehlers & Christian G. G. Sorg, 2022. "Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Lange & Claudia Schwirplies, 2021. "Bargaining With Charitable Promises: True Preferences and Strategic Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 9129, CESifo.
    2. Miller, Luis & Montero, Maria & Vanberg, Christoph, 2018. "Legislative bargaining with heterogeneous disagreement values: Theory and experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 60-92.
    3. Utz Weitzel & Christoph Huber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler & Florian Lindner & Julia Rose & Lauren Cohen, 2020. "Bubbles and Financial Professionals," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(6), pages 2659-2696.
    4. Isaac Levi Henderson & Mark Avis & Wai Hong Kan Tsui & Thanh Ngo & Andrew Gilbey, 2023. "Compound Brands and the Multi-Creation of Brand Associations: Evidence from Airports and Shopping Malls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Ulrike Baum & Frauke Kühn & Marcel Lichters & Anne-Katrin Baum & Renate Deike & Hermann Hinrichs & Thomas Neumann, 2022. "Neurological Outpatients Prefer EEG Home-Monitoring over Inpatient Monitoring—An Analysis Based on the UTAUT Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Talukdar, Debabrata, 2018. "Cost of being a slum dweller in Nairobi: Living under dismal conditions but still paying a housing rent premium," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 42-56.
    7. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2021. "WTO membership, the membership duration and the utilization of non-reciprocal trade preferences offered by the QUAD Countries," EconStor Preprints 247265, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Md Shakhawat Hossain & M. M. Mahbubul Syeed & Kaniz Fatema & Mohammad Faisal Uddin, 2022. "The Perception of Health Professionals in Bangladesh toward the Digitalization of the Health Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Wichers, Hendrika Geesje, 2023. "Targeted intervention using network characteristics: An experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Rohit Singh & Santosh Singh Rathore, 2022. "Linear and non-linear bayesian regression methods for software fault prediction," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1864-1884, August.
    11. Ahmad Bash, 2020. "International Evidence of COVID-19 and Stock Market Returns: An Event Study Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 34-38.
    12. Ewa Lombard & Rajna N. GibsonBrandon, 2024. "Do Wealth Managers Understand Codes of Conduct and Their Ethical Dilemmas? Lessons from an Online Survey," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 553-572, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2029-:d:1044027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.