IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p300-d1014095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Contributes to Athlete Performance Health? A Concept Mapping Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Erin A. Smyth

    (Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce Campus, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

  • Alex Donaldson

    (Centre for Sport and Social Impact, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Michael K. Drew

    (Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce Campus, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

  • Miranda Menaspa

    (Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

  • Jennifer Cooke

    (Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

  • Sara A. Guevara

    (Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce Campus, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

  • Craig Purdam

    (School of Physiotherapy, University of Canberra, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
    La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Craig Appaneal

    (Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Rebecca Wiasak

    (Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

  • Liam Toohey

    (Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce Campus, 11 Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
    Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

Abstract

Background: In high-performance sport, athlete performance health encompasses a state of optimal physical, mental, and social wellbeing related to an athlete’s sporting success. The aim of this study was to identify the priority areas for achieving athlete performance health in Australia’s high-performance sport system (HPSS). Methods: Participants across five socioecological levels of Australia’s HPSS were invited to contribute to this study. Concept mapping, a mixed-methods approach incorporating qualitative and quantitative data collection, was used. Participants brainstormed ideas for what athlete performance health requires, sorted the ideas into groups based on similar meaning and rated the importance, and ease of achieving each idea on a scale from 1 (not important/easiest to overcome) to 5 (extremely important/hardest to overcome). Results: Forty-nine participants generated 97 unique statements that were grouped into 12 clusters following multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis. The three clusters with highest mean importance rating were (mean importance rating (1–5), mean ease of overcoming (1–5)): ‘Behavioral competency’ (4.37, 2.30); ‘Collaboration and teamwork’ (4.19, 2.65); ‘Valuing athlete wellbeing’ (4.17, 2.77). The 12 clusters were grouped into five overarching domains: Domain one—Performance health culture; Domain two—Integrated strategy; Domain three—Operational effectiveness; Domain four—Skilled people; Domain five—Leadership. Conclusion: A diverse sample of key stakeholders from Australia’s HPSS identified five overarching domains that contribute to athlete performance health. The themes that need to be addressed in a strategy to achieve athlete performance health in Australia’s HPSS are ‘Leadership’, ‘Skilled people’, ‘Performance health culture’, ‘Operational effectiveness’, and ‘Integrated strategy’.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin A. Smyth & Alex Donaldson & Michael K. Drew & Miranda Menaspa & Jennifer Cooke & Sara A. Guevara & Craig Purdam & Craig Appaneal & Rebecca Wiasak & Liam Toohey, 2022. "What Contributes to Athlete Performance Health? A Concept Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:300-:d:1014095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/300/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/300/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mannes, Marc, 1989. "Using concept mapping for planning the implementation of a social technology," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 67-74, January.
    2. Rosas, Scott R. & Kane, Mary, 2012. "Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 236-245.
    3. Trochim, William M. & McLinden, Daniel, 2017. "Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 166-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Donaldson & Kiera Staley & Matthew Cameron & Sarah Dowling & Erica Randle & Paul O’Halloran & Nicola McNeil & Arthur Stukas & Matthew Nicholson, 2021. "The Challenges of Partnering to Promote Health through Sport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Amal Chakraborty & Natasha J. Howard & Mark Daniel & Alwin Chong & Nicola Slavin & Alex Brown & Margaret Cargo, 2021. "Prioritizing Built Environmental Factors to Tackle Chronic and Infectious Diseases in Remote Northern Territory (NT) Communities of Australia: A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Chun, JongSerl & Kim, Jinyung & Lee, Serim, 2023. "Development of a cyberbullying victimization scale for adolescents in South Korea," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Marta Roczniewska & Emma Hedberg Rundgren & Henna Hasson & Arnold B. Bakker & Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, 2022. "How Should Job Crafting Interventions Be Implemented to Make Their Effects Last? Protocol for a Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    5. Askelson, Natoshia & Ryan, Grace & McRee, Annie-Laurie & Farris, Paige E. & Shannon, Jackilen & Hanson, Jessica & Kenyon, DenYelle Baete & Daly, Eliza & Avdic, Lejla, 2021. "Using concept mapping to identify opportunities for HPV vaccination efforts: Perspectives from the Midwest and West Coast," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Dare, Lynn & Nowicki, Elizabeth, 2019. "Engaging children and youth in research and evaluation using group concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Laura Borge & Stefanie Bröring, 2020. "What affects technology transfer in emerging knowledge areas? A multi-stakeholder concept mapping study in the bioeconomy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 430-460, April.
    8. Stephen T. Homer, 2023. "Perceptions of smart sustainable cities: a scale development study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3363-3388, August.
    9. Sandesh Pantha & Martin Jones & Richard Gray, 2022. "Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-9, June.
    10. Rosas, Scott R. & Ridings, John W., 2017. "The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 265-276.
    11. Miller, J. Jay & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Donohue-Dioh, Jessica & Geiger, Jennifer M., 2018. "Conceptualizing effective legal representation for Foster youth: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 271-278.
    12. Jay Miller, J. & Benner, Kalea & Thrasher, Shawndaya & Pope, Natalie & Dumas, Tamikia & Damron, Larry J. & Segress, Melissa & Niu, Chunling, 2017. "Planning a mentorship initiative for foster parents: Does gender matter?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 78-84.
    13. Rosas, Scott R. & Smith, Corey & Eenigenburg, Avery & BaileyShea, Chelsea & Jerome, Kathleen & Millane, Maureen, 2022. "A large-scale, geographical approach to using group concept mapping for planning: The Teen Opinions Count (TOC) project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Houle, Andrée-Anne & Besnard, Thérèse & Bérubé, Annie & Dagenais, Christian, 2018. "Factors that influence parent recruitment into prevention programs in early childhood: A concept map of parents', practitioners', and administrators' points of view," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 127-136.
    15. Bar, Haim & Mentch, Lucas, 2017. "R-CMap—An open-source software for concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 284-292.
    16. Valenti, Michael & Celedonia, Karen L. & Wall-Parker, April & Strickler, Amy, 2020. "Trust is essential: Identifying trust building techniques from youth providers across the service array," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Orsi, Rebecca, 2017. "Use of multiple cluster analysis methods to explore the validity of a community outcomes concept map," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 277-283.
    18. Dave, Gaurav & Frerichs, Leah & Jones, Jennifer & Kim, Mimi & Schaal, Jennifer & Vassar, Stefanie & Varma, Deepthi & Striley, Catherine & Ruktanonchai, Corrine & Black, Adina & Hankins, Jennifer & Lov, 2018. "Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 70-78.
    19. Ashlee N. Sawyer & Madison Combs & Viktor Clark & Eric K. Soule & Joseph G. L. Lee & Alison B. Breland, 2023. "Reactions to a Hypothetical Menthol Cigarette Ban among Sexual- and Gender-Minoritized Communities: A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Guichard, Anne & Tardieu, Émilie & Dagenais, Christian & Nour, Kareen & Lafontaine, Ginette & Ridde, Valéry, 2017. "Use of concurrent mixed methods combining concept mapping and focus groups to adapt a health equity tool in Canada," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 169-177.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:300-:d:1014095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.