IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1460-d1754250.html

Designing, Developing, and Evaluating a Stakeholder-Informed Mobile App to Promote Physical Activity in Children

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Papale

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Heath, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, 03042 Cassino, Italy
    European University of Technology EUt+, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Emanuel Festino

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Heath, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, 03042 Cassino, Italy
    European University of Technology EUt+, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Lamprini Papargyri

    (MindSpin, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus)

  • Cristina Cortis

    (Department of Human Sciences, Society and Heath, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, 03042 Cassino, Italy
    European University of Technology EUt+, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Andrea Fusco

    (Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
    See Section Acknowledgment below.)

Abstract

Background : Prolonged sedentary behavior and associated obesity are recognized risk factors for poor health across the lifespan. Globally, data show that many children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 significantly increased their sedentary behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, failing to meet recommended physical activity levels and reporting increased smartphone use. While mobile devices and video games have been traditionally linked to physical inactivity, formats like exergaming, which combine gameplay with gross motor activity, offer potential to promote physical activity. However, many digital health tools for children are developed without incorporating feedback from key stakeholders and end-users (e.g., children, teachers, and guardians). Therefore, this paper, within the Walk around the Earth (E-Walk) project, describes a prospective study that aims (1) to identify the most influential factors or characteristics affecting engagement with and usability of a mobile application promoting physical activity among primary school students; (2) to develop a mobile application for children based on the identified factors and characteristics. Methods : This project will use a group concept mapping approach to identify the most influential features/factors/characteristics affecting engagement with and usability of an app. By involving primary stakeholders (e.g., children, teachers, guardians, and physical activity experts), the project seeks to align the app’s features with primary end-user needs and motivations. Following the app’s development, its effectiveness in increasing physical activity levels and reducing sedentary behaviors will be evaluated through a mixed-method design, incorporating anthropometric data, validated physical activity questionnaires (Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)), and engagement metrics. Conclusions : The E-Walk project integrates participatory design with educational content and activity-based challenges, representing a multidimensional strategy for promoting health and learning in primary school students. Ultimately, this study contributes to the development of user-informed digital interventions that support sustainable behavioral changes, in line with broader goals of child well-being and digital health promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Papale & Emanuel Festino & Lamprini Papargyri & Cristina Cortis & Andrea Fusco, 2025. "Designing, Developing, and Evaluating a Stakeholder-Informed Mobile App to Promote Physical Activity in Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1460-:d:1754250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga Papale & Emanuel Festino & Giancarlo Condello & Francesca Di Rocco & Marianna De Maio & Cristina Cortis & Andrea Fusco, 2023. "Psychophysiological Data Harmonization for the Sustainability of Outdoor Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Rosas, Scott R. & Kane, Mary, 2012. "Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 236-245.
    3. Annette Brons & Katja Braam & Annieck Timmerman & Aline Broekema & Bart Visser & Bart van Ewijk & Suzanne Terheggen-Lagro & Niels Rutjes & Hellen van Leersum & Raoul Engelbert & Ben Kröse & Mai Chinap, 2019. "Promoting Factors for Physical Activity in Children with Asthma Explored through Concept Mapping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Sandesh Pantha & Martin Jones & Richard Gray, 2022. "Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-9, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Borge & Stefanie Bröring, 2020. "What affects technology transfer in emerging knowledge areas? A multi-stakeholder concept mapping study in the bioeconomy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 430-460, April.
    2. Amal Chakraborty & Natasha J. Howard & Mark Daniel & Alwin Chong & Nicola Slavin & Alex Brown & Margaret Cargo, 2021. "Prioritizing Built Environmental Factors to Tackle Chronic and Infectious Diseases in Remote Northern Territory (NT) Communities of Australia: A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Bennett, Stephanie G. & Vaughn, Lisa M. & Smith, Carolyn R. & Pritchard, Tracy J. & Gormley, Denise K. & Bankston, Karen, 2025. "Group concept mapping with patients, parents, clinicians, and researchers to understand the perception of engagement and value in a learning network: A mixed methods study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Chun, JongSerl & Kim, Jinyung & Lee, Serim, 2023. "Development of a cyberbullying victimization scale for adolescents in South Korea," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Stephen T. Homer, 2023. "Perceptions of smart sustainable cities: a scale development study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3363-3388, August.
    6. Sandesh Pantha & Martin Jones & Richard Gray, 2022. "Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-9, June.
    7. Rosas, Scott R. & Ridings, John W., 2017. "The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 265-276.
    8. Miller, J. Jay & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Donohue-Dioh, Jessica & Geiger, Jennifer M., 2018. "Conceptualizing effective legal representation for Foster youth: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 271-278.
    9. Janet Gray & Carrie Petrucci & Connie Engel & Nyisha Green-Washington & Nancy Buermeyer, 2024. "Development of Systemic Interventions to Decrease Breast Cancer Risk: A Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Herbell, Kayla & Albright, Nathaniel & Berger, Sophie & Stanek, Charis & Helsabeck, Nathan P., 2025. "Identifying family engagement priorities in youth residential treatment settings: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Marta Roczniewska & Emma Hedberg Rundgren & Henna Hasson & Arnold B. Bakker & Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, 2022. "How Should Job Crafting Interventions Be Implemented to Make Their Effects Last? Protocol for a Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Erin A. Smyth & Alex Donaldson & Michael K. Drew & Miranda Menaspa & Jennifer Cooke & Sara A. Guevara & Craig Purdam & Craig Appaneal & Rebecca Wiasak & Liam Toohey, 2022. "What Contributes to Athlete Performance Health? A Concept Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Jay Miller, J. & Benner, Kalea & Thrasher, Shawndaya & Pope, Natalie & Dumas, Tamikia & Damron, Larry J. & Segress, Melissa & Niu, Chunling, 2017. "Planning a mentorship initiative for foster parents: Does gender matter?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 78-84.
    14. Rosas, Scott R. & Smith, Corey & Eenigenburg, Avery & BaileyShea, Chelsea & Jerome, Kathleen & Millane, Maureen, 2022. "A large-scale, geographical approach to using group concept mapping for planning: The Teen Opinions Count (TOC) project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Houle, Andrée-Anne & Besnard, Thérèse & Bérubé, Annie & Dagenais, Christian, 2018. "Factors that influence parent recruitment into prevention programs in early childhood: A concept map of parents', practitioners', and administrators' points of view," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 127-136.
    16. Valenti, Michael & Celedonia, Karen L. & Wall-Parker, April & Strickler, Amy, 2020. "Trust is essential: Identifying trust building techniques from youth providers across the service array," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Orsi, Rebecca, 2017. "Use of multiple cluster analysis methods to explore the validity of a community outcomes concept map," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 277-283.
    18. Dave, Gaurav & Frerichs, Leah & Jones, Jennifer & Kim, Mimi & Schaal, Jennifer & Vassar, Stefanie & Varma, Deepthi & Striley, Catherine & Ruktanonchai, Corrine & Black, Adina & Hankins, Jennifer & Lov, 2018. "Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 70-78.
    19. Ashlee N. Sawyer & Madison Combs & Viktor Clark & Eric K. Soule & Joseph G. L. Lee & Alison B. Breland, 2023. "Reactions to a Hypothetical Menthol Cigarette Ban among Sexual- and Gender-Minoritized Communities: A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Stoyanov, Slavi & Jablokow, Kathryn & Rosas, Scott R. & Wopereis, Iwan G.J.H. & Kirschner, Paul A., 2017. "Concept mapping—An effective method for identifying diversity and congruity in cognitive style," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 238-244.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1460-:d:1754250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.