IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2061-d747875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Videoconference Fatigue: A Conceptual Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Döring

    (Institute of Media and Communication Science, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany)

  • Katrien De Moor

    (Department of Information Security and Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Markus Fiedler

    (Department of Technology and Aesthetics, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 374 35 Karlshamn, Sweden)

  • Katrin Schoenenberg

    (Department for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Alexander Raake

    (Institute for Media Technology, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany)

Abstract

Videoconferencing (VC) is a type of online meeting that allows two or more participants from different locations to engage in live multi-directional audio-visual communication and collaboration (e.g., via screen sharing). The COVID-19 pandemic has induced a boom in both private and professional videoconferencing in the early 2020s that elicited controversial public and academic debates about its pros and cons. One main concern has been the phenomenon of videoconference fatigue. The aim of this conceptual review article is to contribute to the conceptual clarification of VC fatigue. We use the popular and succinct label “Zoom fatigue” interchangeably with the more generic label “videoconference fatigue” and define it as the experience of fatigue during and/or after a videoconference, regardless of the specific VC system used. We followed a structured eight-phase process of conceptual analysis that led to a conceptual model of VC fatigue with four key causal dimensions: (1) personal factors, (2) organizational factors, (3) technological factors, and (4) environmental factors. We present this 4D model describing the respective dimensions with their sub-dimensions based on theories, available evidence, and media coverage. The 4D-model is meant to help researchers advance empirical research on videoconference fatigue.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Döring & Katrien De Moor & Markus Fiedler & Katrin Schoenenberg & Alexander Raake, 2022. "Videoconference Fatigue: A Conceptual Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2061-:d:747875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2061/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2061/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janine Bröder & Orkan Okan & Torsten M. Bollweg & Dirk Bruland & Paulo Pinheiro & Ullrich Bauer, 2019. "Child and Youth Health Literacy: A Conceptual Analysis and Proposed Target-Group-Centred Definition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Christoph Weinert & Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Tim Weitzel, 2020. "Correction to: Technostress mitigation: an experimental study of social support during a computer freeze," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(8), pages 1251-1251, September.
    3. Carlos Ferran & Stephanie Watts, 2008. "Videoconferencing in the Field: A Heuristic Processing Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1565-1578, September.
    4. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    5. Kirk, Colleen P. & Rifkin, Laura S., 2020. "I'll trade you diamonds for toilet paper: Consumer reacting, coping and adapting behaviors in the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 124-131.
    6. Alan R. Dennis & Susan T. Kinney, 1998. "Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 256-274, September.
    7. Adrian Bartoszek & Dariusz Walkowiak & Agnieszka Bartoszek & Grzegorz Kardas, 2020. "Mental Well-Being (Depression, Loneliness, Insomnia, Daily Life Fatigue) during COVID-19 Related Home-Confinement—A Study from Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Christoph Weinert & Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Tim Weitzel, 2020. "Technostress mitigation: an experimental study of social support during a computer freeze," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(8), pages 1199-1249, September.
    9. Willem Standaert & Steve Muylle & Amit Basu, 2016. "An empirical study of the effectiveness of telepresence as a business meeting mode," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 323-339, December.
    10. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Apreda, Riccardo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2020. "Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josep Petchamé & Ignasi Iriondo & Garazi Azanza, 2022. "“Seeing and Being Seen” or Just “Seeing” in a Smart Classroom Context When Videoconferencing: A User Experience-Based Qualitative Research on the Use of Cameras," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willem Standaert & Steve Muylle & Amit Basu, 2016. "An empirical study of the effectiveness of telepresence as a business meeting mode," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 323-339, December.
    2. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    3. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    4. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    5. Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Jakob Wirth & Tim Weitzel, 2022. "Trial-Period Technostress: A Conceptual Definition and Mixed-Methods Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 489-514, June.
    6. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Noel Lindsay & Wendy Lindsay & Janice Jones, 2019. "Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 145-164, June.
    7. Aros, Susan K. & Gibbons, Deborah E., 2018. "Exploring communication media options in an inter-organizational disaster response coordination network using agent-based simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 451-465.
    8. John R. Carlson & Joey F. George & Judee K. Burgoon & Mark Adkins & Cindy H. White, 2004. "Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 5-28, January.
    9. Denk, Maximilian & Khabyuk, Olexiy, "undated". "Wie relevant sind Chatbots als Kommunikations- und Marketinginstrument für Hochschulen? Konzeption und Akzeptanz eines Chatbot-Prototyps für den Master-Studiengang „Kommunikations-, Multimedia- und Ma," Duesseldorf Working Papers in Applied Management and Economics 52, Duesseldorf University of Applied Sciences.
    10. Roma, Paolo & Aloini, Davide, 2019. "How does brand-related user-generated content differ across social media? Evidence reloaded," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 322-339.
    11. Naim Zierau & Christian Hildebrand & Anouk Bergner & Francesc Busquet & Anuschka Schmitt & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2023. "Voice bots on the frontline: Voice-based interfaces enhance flow-like consumer experiences & boost service outcomes," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 823-842, July.
    12. Taekyung Kim & Hwirim Jo & Yerin Yhee & Chulmo Koo, 2022. "Robots, artificial intelligence, and service automation (RAISA) in hospitality: sentiment analysis of YouTube streaming data," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 259-275, March.
    13. Jeanine Warisse Turner & N. Lamar Reinsch, 2010. "Successful and unsuccessful multicommunication episodes: Engaging in dialogue or juggling messages?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 277-285, July.
    14. Giuseppe Crapa & Maria Elena Latino & Paolo Roma, 2024. "The performance of green communication across social media: Evidence from large‐scale retail industry in Italy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 493-513, January.
    15. Michele Griessmair & Sabine T. Koeszegi, 2009. "Exploring the Cognitive-Emotional Fugue in Electronic Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 213-234, May.
    16. Lionel P. Robert & Alan R. Dennis & Manju K. Ahuja, 2008. "Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 314-334, September.
    17. Josef Windsperger & Nina Gorovaia, 2011. "Knowledge attributes and the choice of knowledge transfer mechanism in networks: the case of franchising," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(4), pages 617-640, November.
    18. Bryant, Stephanie M. & Albring, Susan M. & Murthy, Uday, 2009. "The effects of reward structure, media richness and gender on virtual teams," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 190-213.
    19. Yue Wu & Qianling Jiang & Hui’e Liang & ShiYu Ni, 2022. "What Drives Users to Adopt a Digital Museum? A Case of Virtual Exhibition Hall of National Costume Museum," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    20. Grant, Stephanie M. & Hodge, Frank D. & Sinha, Roshan K., 2018. "How disclosure medium affects investor reactions to CEO bragging, modesty, and humblebragging," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 118-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2061-:d:747875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.