IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16278-d993936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation of the Third Sector to Improve Nature Reserve Management in the Post-COVID-19 Epidemic Era

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Guo

    (School of Law, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Zhitao Zheng

    (School of Law, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Yourui Zheng

    (School of Law, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

Abstract

Encouraging the strong recovery of the economy is an urgent priority for all nations in the post-COVID-19 epidemic era. Social enterprise, as a new-type third sector, boasts unique advantages in structure and function, which can reach public interest targets without relying on government spending; social enterprises can effectively reduce the cost of ecological construction and maintenance, provide more professional and diverse services, and promote sustainable development in the regional economy, society, and ecology. Through an analysis of their structure and function, this study proved that social enterprises serve as a significant institutional innovation to cure the “government failure” and “market failure” in the area of public interest with the merits of the simple structure of the main body, strong self-innovation ability, high spontaneity of members, and convenient application of laws. Thus, its introduction to nature reserve management can pragmatically relieve the financial pressure and increasingly achieve public interest goals. The empirical research indicates that social enterprises need to be supplemented with the maintenance mechanism of bidirectional targets so that they can do their best to meet the requirements of “low government spending, high ecological benefits” in constructing nature reserves in the post-COVID-19 epidemic era, fully motivate the market, and develop the reliable force for public welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Guo & Zhitao Zheng & Yourui Zheng, 2022. "Innovation of the Third Sector to Improve Nature Reserve Management in the Post-COVID-19 Epidemic Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16278-:d:993936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacques Defourny & Marthe Nyssens, 2010. "Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 32-53, March.
    2. Le Grand, Julian, 1991. "The Theory of Government Failure," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 423-442, October.
    3. Robert B. Denhardt & Janet V. Denhardt, 2003. "The New Public Service: An Approach to Reform," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 3-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Nghia Thi Thu Nguyen & Cheng-Tao Tang & Chun Yee Wong, 2021. "The Impacts of Social Enterprises on Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Carlo Borzaga & Silvia Sacchetti, 2015. "Why Social Enterprises Are Asking to Be Multi-stakeholder and Deliberative: An Explanation around the Costs of Exclusion," Euricse Working Papers 1575, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    4. Hristina Blagoycheva & Andriyana Andreeva & Galina Yolova, 2020. "Social Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development and Social Inclusion (Economic and Legal Aspects)," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 79-98.
    5. Lifshitz, Chen Chana, 2017. "Fostering employability among youth at-risk in a multi-cultural context: Insights from a pilot intervention program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 20-34.
    6. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Eunsoo Choi & Eunji Kim & Inji Kim & Incheol Choi, 2020. "Attitude Toward Social Enterprises: A Comparison between For-Profit and Social Enterprise Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Tanja Collavo, 2018. "Unpacking Social Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Definition Chaos and Its Consequences in England," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(2), pages 49-82.
    9. Daniar Siahaan & Sri Iswati & Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi, 2019. "Social Enterprise: The Alternatives Financial Support For Educational Institusion," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11.
    10. Choi, Nia & Majumdar, Satyajit, 2014. "Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 363-376.
    11. NakHyeok Choi & Kyujin Jung, 2017. "Measuring Efficiency and Effectiveness of Highway Management in Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Simon Cornée & Anastasia Cozarenco & Ariane Szafarz, 2023. "The Changing Role of Banks in the Financial System: Social Versus Conventional Banks," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, in: Chrysovalantis Gaganis & Fotios Pasiouras & Menelaos Tasiou & Constantin Zopounidis (ed.), Sustainable Finance and ESG, pages 1-25, Palgrave Macmillan.
    13. Alena I. Nefedova, 2015. "Social Entrepreneurship in Russia: Key Players and Development Potentiality," HSE Working papers WP BRP 51/STI/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    14. Gift Dafuleya, 2014. "Social Value Creation and Institution-Entrepreneurial Dynamics in a Three Sector Economy," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(10), pages 795-809.
    15. Silvia Sacchetti, 2015. "Inclusive and Exclusive Social Preferences: A Deweyan Framework to Explain Governance Heterogeneity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 473-485, February.
    16. Karina Cagarman & Jan Kratzer & Katharina Osbelt, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurship: Dissection of a Phenomenon through a German Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Charles Amoyea Atogenzoya & Anna Comacchio, 2019. "Nature and Management of Social-business Tensions: A Study of Micro and Small Social Enterprises in Developing Countries," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 8612069, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    18. Rama Murthy, Sudhir & Roll, Kate & Colin-Jones, Alastair, 2021. "Ending business-non-profit partnerships: The spinout of social enterprises," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    19. Abraham Singer, 2018. "Justice Failure: Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 97-115, April.
    20. Mogues, Tewodaj & Yu, Bingxin & Fan, Shenggen & Mcbride, Linden, 2012. "The impacts of public investment in and for agriculture: Synthesis of the existing evidence," IFPRI discussion papers 1217, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16278-:d:993936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.