IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13832-d951889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recruiting and Engaging Women of Reproductive Age with Obesity: Insights from A Mixed-Methods Study within A Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Louise Killeen

    (UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, D02 YH21 Dublin, Ireland)

  • David F. Byrne

    (UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, D02 YH21 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Aisling A. Geraghty

    (UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, D02 YH21 Dublin, Ireland
    UCD Institute of Food and Health, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Cara A. Yelverton

    (UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, D02 YH21 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Douwe van Sinderen

    (APC Microbiome Ireland, Biosciences Research Institute, National University of Ireland, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    School of Microbiology, National University of Ireland, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland)

  • Paul D. Cotter

    (APC Microbiome Ireland, Biosciences Research Institute, National University of Ireland, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 C996 Cork, Ireland)

  • Eileen F. Murphy

    (Precision Biotics Ltd. (Novozymes Cork), Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, T12 D292 Cork, Ireland)

  • Sharleen L. O’Reilly

    (UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, D02 YH21 Dublin, Ireland
    UCD Institute of Food and Health, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fionnuala M. McAuliffe

    (UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, D02 YH21 Dublin, Ireland
    APC Microbiome Ireland, Biosciences Research Institute, National University of Ireland, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Engaging women with obesity in health-related studies during preconception is challenging. Limited data exists relating to their participation. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences and opinions of women participating in a weight-related, preconception trial. This is an explanatory sequential (quan-QUAL) mixed-methods Study Within A Trial, embedded in the GetGutsy randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN11295995). Screened participants completed an online survey of eight questions (single or multiple choice and Likert scale) on recruitment, motivations and opinions on study activities. Participants with abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥ 80 cm) were invited to a subsequent semi-structured, online focus group (n = 2, 9 participants) that was transcribed and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, with a pragmatic epistemological approach. The survey (n = 102) showed the main research participation motivations were supporting health research (n = 38, 37.3%) and wanting health screening (n = 30, 29.4%). Most participants were recruited via email (n = 35, 34.7%) or social media (n = 15, 14.7%). In the FGs, participants valued flexibility, convenience and. research methods that aligned with their lifestyles. Participants had an expanded view of health that considered emotional well-being and balance alongside more traditional medical assessments. Clinical trialists should consider well-being, addressing the interconnectedness of health and incorporate a variety of research activities to engage women of reproductive age with obesity.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Louise Killeen & David F. Byrne & Aisling A. Geraghty & Cara A. Yelverton & Douwe van Sinderen & Paul D. Cotter & Eileen F. Murphy & Sharleen L. O’Reilly & Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, 2022. "Recruiting and Engaging Women of Reproductive Age with Obesity: Insights from A Mixed-Methods Study within A Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13832-:d:951889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13832/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13832/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seonad K. Madden & Helen Skouteris & Cate Bailey & Andrew P. Hills & Kiran D. K. Ahuja & Briony Hill, 2020. "Women in the Workplace: Promoting Healthy Lifestyles and Mitigating Weight Gain during the Preconception, Pregnancy, and Postpartum Periods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-7, January.
    2. Puhl, R.M. & Heuer, C.A., 2010. "Obesity stigma: Important considerations for public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(6), pages 1019-1028.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peggy J. Liu & Kelly L. Haws & Karen Scherr & Joseph P. Redden & James R. Bettman & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2019. "The Primacy of “What” over “How Much”: How Type and Quantity Shape Healthiness Perceptions of Food Portions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3353-3381, July.
    2. Roose, Gudrun & Van Kerckhove, Anneleen & Huyghe, Elke, 2017. "Honey they shrank the food! An integrative study of the impact of food granularity and its operationalization mode on consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 210-220.
    3. Amin, Vikesh & Flores, Carlos A. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso, 2020. "The impact of BMI on mental health: Further evidence from genetic markers," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    4. Frederick, David A. & Saguy, Abigail C. & Gruys, Kjerstin, 2016. "Culture, health, and bigotry: How exposure to cultural accounts of fatness shape attitudes about health risk, health policies, and weight-based prejudice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 271-279.
    5. Boyoung Park & Ha Na Cho & Eunji Choi & Da Hea Seo & Sue Kim & Yeong-Ran Park & Kui Son Choi & Yumie Rhee, 2019. "Self-perceptions of body weight status according to age-groups among Korean women: A nationwide population-based survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Gerend, Mary A. & Stewart, Cylena & Wetzel, Karen, 2022. "Vulnerability and resilience to the harmful health consequences of weight discrimination in Black, Latina, and sexual minority women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    7. Katherine Sang & Jen Remnant & Thomas Calvard & Katriona Myhill, 2021. "Blood Work: Managing Menstruation, Menopause and Gynaecological Health Conditions in the Workplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Li, Shaobo (Kevin) & Kokkoris, Michail D. & Savani, Krishna, 2020. "Does everyone have the potential to achieve their ideal body weight? Lay theories about body weight and support for price discrimination policies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 129-142.
    9. Zoë C. Meleo-Erwin, 2020. "Bariatric Biosociality: Pushed Together, Pulled Apart," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    10. Yeeli Mui & Bruce Y. Lee & Atif Adam & Anna Y. Kharmats & Nadine Budd & Claudia Nau & Joel Gittelsohn, 2015. "Healthy versus Unhealthy Suppliers in Food Desert Neighborhoods: A Network Analysis of Corner Stores’ Food Supplier Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.
    11. David Berrigan & Ailing Liu & Britni R. Belcher & Ann Chao & Liwen Fang & Charles E. Matthews & Baohua Wang & Linhong Wang & Ning Wang & Yu Wang & Lichen Yang & Martha S. Linet & Nancy Potischman, 2020. "Physical Activity, Step Counts, and Grip Strength in the Chinese Children and Families Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Mooney, Stephen J. & El-Sayed, Abdulrahman M., 2016. "Stigma and the etiology of depression among the obese: An agent-based exploration," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-7.
    13. Briony Hill & Alexandra Azzari Wynn-Jones & Kimberley J. Botting & Emma H. Cassinelli & Michael P. Daly & Caitlin Victoria Gardiner & Stephanie J. Hanley & Nicola Heslehurst & Regine Steegers-Theuniss, 2023. "The Challenge of Weight Stigma for Women in the Preconception Period: Workshop Recommendations for Action from the 5th European Conference on Preconception Health and Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Sikorski, Claudia & Luppa, Melanie & Angermeyer, Matthias C. & Schomerus, Georg & Link, Bruce & Riedel-Heller, Steffi G., 2015. "The association of BMI and social distance towards obese individuals is mediated by sympathy and understanding," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 25-30.
    15. Niamh K Shortt & Esther Rind & Jamie Pearce & Richard Mitchell, 2014. "Integrating Environmental Justice and Socioecological Models of Health to Understand Population-Level Physical Activity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1479-1495, June.
    16. Robinovich, Jossiana & Ossa, Ximena & Baeza, Bernardita & Krumeich, Anja & van der Borne, Bart, 2018. "Embodiment of social roles and thinness as a form of capital: A qualitative approach towards understanding female obesity disparities in Chile," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 80-86.
    17. Zahra Mojtahedi & Shirin Farjadian, 2022. "Awareness of Obesity-Related Cancers: A Complex Issue," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-3, May.
    18. Giovana Santarosa Cassiano & Joana Pereira Carvalho-Ferreira & Nicola J. Buckland & Diogo Thimoteo da Cunha, 2021. "Do Registered Dietitians, Nutrition Students, and Laypeople Perceive Individuals with Obesity Differently?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Lily O’Hara & Jane Taylor, 2018. "What’s Wrong With the ‘War on Obesity?’ A Narrative Review of the Weight-Centered Health Paradigm and Development of the 3C Framework to Build Critical Competency for a Paradigm Shift," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, May.
    20. William R. Tebar & Gerson Ferrari & Jorge Mota & Ewerton P. Antunes & Beatriz A. S. Aguilar & Javier Brazo-Sayavera & Diego G. D. Christofaro, 2022. "Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors between Adolescents and Their Parents Is Mitigated by Parental Physical Activity—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13832-:d:951889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.