IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13149-d940617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Victim’s Resilience and Self-Esteem in Experiencing Internet Hate

Author

Listed:
  • Wiktoria Jędryczka

    (Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Piotr Sorokowski

    (Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Dobrowolska

    (Institute of Education and Communication Research, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Hutnicza 9-9A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

Despite the growing prevalence of research on Internet hate, little is still known about the psychological factors that differentiate those who are negatively affected by being subjected to Internet hate and those who are not affected at all or only to a small degree. In the present studies, we aimed to verify if resilience and self-esteem could be predictors of such responses. A total of 60 public figures (politicians, athletes, and artists; 46.7% women) and 1128 ordinary Internet users (25.1% women) participated in the study. Participants completed The Brief Resilience Scale, The Self-Esteem Scale, and The Internet Hate Concern Scale, which was created for this study, and determined how often they experience hate online. The results showed that the public figures experience Internet hate more often but were less concerned with it than the ordinary Internet users, who received online hate less often, but were more worried about it. In both groups, high self-esteem and high resilience were negative predictors of greater concern with received online hate. Our study is the first step to understanding what makes the difference between people who cope well and are not particularly concerned, and people who are greatly affected by received Internet hate.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiktoria Jędryczka & Piotr Sorokowski & Małgorzata Dobrowolska, 2022. "The Role of Victim’s Resilience and Self-Esteem in Experiencing Internet Hate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13149-:d:940617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Benjamin Lowry & Jun Zhang & Chuang Wang & Mikko Siponen, 2016. "Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 962-986, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Lin & Ngai, Steven Sek-yum, 2020. "The effects of anonymity, invisibility, asynchrony, and moral disengagement on cyberbullying perpetration among school-aged children in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Melina A. Throuvala & Mark D. Griffiths & Mike Rennoldson & Daria J. Kuss, 2019. "A ‘Control Model’ of Social Media Engagement in Adolescence: A Grounded Theory Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Michelle Hui Lim Lee & Manveen Kaur & Vinorra Shaker & Anne Yee & Rohana Sham & Ching Sin Siau, 2023. "Cyberbullying, Social Media Addiction and Associations with Depression, Anxiety, and Stress among Medical Students in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Jūratė Kuklytė, 2018. "Cybersexual Harassment as ICTs Development Consequences: A Review," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 187-195.
    5. Shuaa A. Aljasir & Maisoon O. Alsebaei, 2022. "Cyberbullying and cybervictimization on digital media platforms: the role of demographic variables and parental mediation strategies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Ji Wu & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & J. Leon Zhao, 2021. "FairPlay: Detecting and Deterring Online Customer Misbehavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1323-1346, December.
    7. Arnett, Rachel D. & Sidanius, Jim, 2018. "Sacrificing status for social harmony: Concealing relatively high status identities from one’s peers," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 108-126.
    8. Mario Silic & Paul Benjamin Lowry, 2021. "Breaking Bad in Cyberspace: Understanding why and how Black Hat Hackers Manage their Nerves to Commit their Virtual Crimes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 329-341, April.
    9. Daria Denti & Alessandra Faggian, 2021. "Where do angry birds tweet? Income inequality and online hate in Italy," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(3), pages 483-506.
    10. Chaouali, Walid & Hammami, Samiha Mjahed & Cristóvão Veríssimo, José Manuel & Harris, Lloyd C. & El-Manstrly, Dahlia & Woodside, Arch G., 2022. "Customers who misbehave: Identifying restaurant guests “acting out†via asymmetric case models," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Christine Abdalla Mikhaeil & Richard Baskerville, 2019. "Using semiotics to analyze representational complexity in social media," Post-Print hal-02509212, HAL.
    12. Ae Ri Lee, 2021. "Investigating Moderators of the Influence of Enablers on Participation in Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Sam Ransbotham & Robert G. Fichman & Ram Gopal & Alok Gupta, 2016. "Special Section Introduction—Ubiquitous IT and Digital Vulnerabilities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 834-847, December.
    14. Isabella Seeber & Johannes Erhardt, 2023. "Working from Home with Flexible and Permeable Boundaries," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(3), pages 277-292, June.
    15. Marten Risius & Kai Spohrer, 2017. "A Blockchain Research Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(6), pages 385-409, December.
    16. Tommy K. H. Chan & Christy M. K. Cheung & Izak Benbasat & Bo Xiao & Zach W. Y. Lee, 2023. "Bystanders Join in Cyberbullying on Social Networking Sites: The Deindividuation and Moral Disengagement Perspectives," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 828-846, September.
    17. Jafarzadeh, Hamed & Tafti, Mahdi & Intezari, Ali & Sohrabi, Babak, 2021. "All's well that ends well: Effective recovery from failures during the delivery phase of e-retailing process," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Yuhosua Ryoo & WooJin Kim, 2024. "Approach versus Avoidance: A Self-Regulatory Perspective on Hypocrisy Induction in Anti-Cyberbullying CSR Campaigns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 345-364, January.
    19. Grace Fox & Tabitha L. James, 2021. "Toward an Understanding of the Antecedents to Health Information Privacy Concern: A Mixed Methods Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1537-1562, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13149-:d:940617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.