IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7437-d841212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Pattern of Technological Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta Region and Its Impact on Water Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Jianwei Zhang

    (School of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Heng Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232038, China)

  • Guoxin Jiao

    (School of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Jiayi Wang

    (School of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Jingjing Li

    (School of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Mengzhen Li

    (School of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Haining Jiang

    (College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)

Abstract

The impact of technological innovation on water pollution is an important parameter to determine and monitor while promoting and furthering a region’s economic development. Here, exploratory spatial data analysis was used to analyze: the spatial patterns of technological innovation and water pollution in the Yangtze River, the changes in technical innovation and the resulting changes in water pollution, and the impact of technological innovation on water pollution. The following major inferences were drawn from the obtained results: (1) The spatial pattern of innovation input has a single-center structure that tends to spread. The patent innovation output has evolved, from a single spatial pattern with Shanghai as the core to a diffusion structure with three cores-Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Nanjing. (2) The aggregation mode of water pollution has evolved from the original “Z” mode to a new mode of core agglomeration, and water pollution is constantly being reduced. (3) The trends of change in patent innovation output and innovation input are roughly the same, while the trends of both and that of water pollution are contrary to each other. (4) The correlations between innovation input, patented innovation output, and water pollution are relatively low. From the perspective of spatial distribution, the number of cities with medium and high levels of gray correlation with water pollution is the same.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianwei Zhang & Heng Li & Guoxin Jiao & Jiayi Wang & Jingjing Li & Mengzhen Li & Haining Jiang, 2022. "Spatial Pattern of Technological Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta Region and Its Impact on Water Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7437-:d:841212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Xie & Qi Sun & Shaohong Wang & Xiaoping Li & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Environmental Regulation Affect Export Quality? Theory and Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Fei Fan & Dailin Cao & Ning Ma, 2020. "Is Improvement of Innovation Efficiency Conducive to Haze Governance? Empirical Evidence from 283 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Fei Fan & Shangze Dai & Keke Zhang & Haiqian Ke, 2021. "Innovation agglomeration and urban hierarchy: evidence from Chinese cities," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(54), pages 6300-6318, November.
    4. Fei Fan & Huan Lian & Song Wang, 2020. "Can regional collaborative innovation improve innovation efficiency? An empirical study of Chinese cities," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 440-463, March.
    5. Gordon Akon-Yamga & Chux U. Daniels & Wilhemina Quaye & Blanche M. Ting & Adelaide A. Asante, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy approach to e-waste management in Ghana: Perspectives of actors on transformative changes," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 387-397.
    6. Yuan-Chieh Chang & Po-Hsuan Chen & Min-Jun Teng, 2021. "Erratum to: How do institutional changes facilitate university-centric networks in Taiwan? The triple-helix model of innovation view," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 602-603.
    7. Guoxiang Li & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2021. "Construction land reduction, rural financial development, and industrial structure optimization," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1783-1803, September.
    8. Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent‐Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2011. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 803-842, September.
    9. Jian-qing Zhang & Tingting Chen & Fei Fan & Song Wang, 2018. "Empirical research on time-varying characteristics and efficiency of the Chinese economy and monetary policy: evidence from the MI-TVP-VAR model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(33), pages 3596-3613, July.
    10. Markus M. Bugge & Fazilat Siddiq, 2021. "Empowering professionalism in mission-oriented innovation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 423-437.
    11. Hanna Hottenrott & Sascha Rexh�user, 2015. "Policy-Induced Environmental Technology and Inventive Efforts: Is There a Crowding Out?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 375-401, July.
    12. Fei Fan & Xuerong Zhang & Xueli Wang, 2022. "Are there political cycles hidden inside collaborative innovation efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 532-551.
    13. Shuai Liu & Fei Fan & Jianqing Zhang, 2019. "Are Small Cities More Environmentally Friendly? An Empirical Study from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Siliang Guo & Heng Ma, 2021. "Does industrial agglomeration promote high‐quality development of the Yellow River Basin in China? Empirical test from the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2040-2070, December.
    15. Balázs Borsi, 2021. "The Balanced State of Application-oriented Public Research and Technology Organisations," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 612-629.
    16. Charles Ayoubi & Michele Pezzoni & Fabiana Visentin, 2021. "Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 635-648.
    17. Sowjanya Dhulipala & Gopal R. Patil, 2021. "Identification of freight generating industry complexes: A descriptive spatial analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2680-2712, December.
    18. Julie L. Hotchkiss & Anil Rupasingha, 2021. "Individual social capital and migration," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 808-837, June.
    19. Elisa Cordeiro Bastos & Aline Rossales Sengik & Jorge Tello-Gamarra, 2021. "Fifty years of University-industry collaboration: a global bibliometrics overview," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 177-199.
    20. Chiou, Tzu-Yun & Chan, Hing Kai & Lettice, Fiona & Chung, Sai Ho, 2011. "The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 822-836.
    21. Moriki Hosoe & Tohru Naito, 2006. "Trans‐boundary pollution transmission and regional agglomeration effects," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 99-120, March.
    22. Michael Clormann, 2021. "Switching between worlds apart: Negotiating European space sector cultures through innovation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 521-530.
    23. Husam Arman & Simona Iammarino & J Eduardo Ibarra-Olivo & Neil Lee, 2022. "Systems of innovation, diversification, and the R&D trap: A case study of Kuwait [Building Technological Capability in the Less Developed Countries: The Role of a National System of Innovation]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 179-190.
    24. Tommaso Agasisti & Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "Cross-country analysis of higher education institutions’ efficiency: The role of strategic positioning," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(1), pages 66-79.
    25. Zhengwen Wang & Yunxiao Zong & Yuwan Dan & Shi-Jie Jiang, 2021. "Country risk and international trade: evidence from the China-B&R countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(20), pages 1784-1788, November.
    26. Camilla Adelle & Tristan Görgens & Florian Kroll & Bruno Losch, 2021. "Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary communities of practice: Experiences from food governance in South Africa," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 145-153.
    27. Jia Gao & Ge Song & Shuhan Liu, 2022. "Factors influencing farmers’ willingness and behavior choices to withdraw from rural homesteads in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 112-131, March.
    28. Yuan-Chieh Chang & Po-Hsuan Chen & Min-Jun Teng, 2021. "How do institutional changes facilitate university-centric networks in Taiwan? The Triple Helix model of innovation view," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 309-324.
    29. Azadegan, Arash & Wagner, Stephan M., 2011. "Industrial upgrading, exploitative innovations and explorative innovations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 54-65, March.
    30. Song Wang & Jiexin Wang & Chenqi Wei & Xueli Wang & Fei Fan, 2021. "Collaborative innovation efficiency: From within cities to between cities—Empirical analysis based on innovative cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1330-1360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Qian & Zhenpeng Cheng & Zhengwen Wang & Dingyi Qi, 2022. "What Affects Rural Ecological Environment Governance Efficiency? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Liang Zhao & Lifei Xu & Ling Li & Jing Hu & Lin Mu, 2022. "Can Inbound Tourism Improve Regional Ecological Efficiency? An Empirical Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Juan Hu & Chengjin Ma & Chen Li, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Improve Regional Environmental Carrying Capacity? An Empirical Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Zuoming Liu & Changbo Qiu & Min Sun & Dongmin Zhang, 2022. "Environmental Performance Evaluation of Key Polluting Industries in China—Taking the Power Industry as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Jing Ma & Dan Liu & Zhengwen Wang, 2023. "Sponge City Construction and Urban Economic Sustainable Development: An Ecological Philosophical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Lili Yang & Ning Ma, 2022. "Empirical Study on the Influence of Urban Environmental Industrial Structure Optimization on Ecological Landscape Greening Construction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Chen Li & Heng Li & Xionghe Qin, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions and Its Influencing Factors in China: Evidence from 286 Prefecture-Level Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Jie Fan & Zhuo Shen & Zhengwen Wang, 2022. "The Threshold Effect of Urban Levels on Environmental Collaborative Governance: An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Ning Ma & Puyu Liu & Yadong Xiao & Hengyun Tang & Jianqing Zhang, 2022. "Can Green Technological Innovation Reduce Hazardous Air Pollutants?—An Empirical Test Based on 283 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Qianrui Hwang & Min Yao & Shugang Li & Fang Wang & Zhenmin Luo & Zheng Li & Tongshuang Liu, 2023. "Risk Spillovers between China’s Carbon and Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Liang Zhao & Liangyu Chen, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Government Environmental Information Disclosure on Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Experience from Chinese Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Jianqing Zhang & Haichao Yu & Keke Zhang & Liang Zhao & Fei Fan, 2021. "Can Innovation Agglomeration Reduce Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Mingxia Liu & Wei Jiang, 2022. "Empirical Research on the Influence Mechanisms of Digital Resources Input on Service Innovation in China’s Finance Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Yunling Ye & Sheng Ye & Haichao Yu, 2021. "Can Industrial Collaborative Agglomeration Reduce Haze Pollution? City-Level Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Wenyi Yang & Xueli Wang & Keke Zhang & Zikan Ke, 2020. "COVID-19, Urbanization Pattern and Economic Recovery: An Analysis of Hubei, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Chen Li & Le Zhang & Qinyi Gu & Jia Guo & Yi Huang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Urbanization Factors of Urban Household Carbon Emissions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-22, April.
    17. Haiqian Ke & Bo Yang & Shangze Dai, 2022. "Does Intensive Land Use Contribute to Energy Efficiency?—Evidence Based on a Spatial Durbin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Yiping Sun & Xiangyi Li & Tengyuan Zhang & Jiawei Fu, 2022. "Does Trade Policy Uncertainty Exacerbate Environmental Pollution?—Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Haiqian Ke & Wenyi Yang & Xiaoyang Liu & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Le Zhang & Qinyi Gu & Chen Li & Yi Huang, 2022. "Characteristics and Spatial–Temporal Differences of Urban “Production, Living and Ecological” Environmental Quality in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7437-:d:841212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.