IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p3052-d517847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Cognitive Mechanism Underlying Situation Awareness of Pilots’ Unsafe Behaviors Using Quantitative Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Shaoqi Jiang

    (College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Weijiong Chen

    (College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Yutao Kang

    (College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Jiahao Liu

    (College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Wanglai Kuang

    (Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Situation awareness (SA) of pilots’ unsafe behavior can ensure safety onboard. Thus, the cognitive mechanism that controls the SA leading to unsafe behavior must be articulated. This study employs the SA model and theory of planned behavior (TPB) to articulate a quantitative model of ship safe piloting. Firstly, the hierarchical classification framework of unsafe behaviors was constructed as an analytical foundation for rational and unconscious behaviors in sight of cognitive processes, and then the measurement elements of the cognitive mechanisms for behaviors were identified. Subsequently, based on the structural model, a hypothetical model of the cognitive path for unsafe behaviors was proposed by using the extended TPB, where there are four independent variables (i.e., attitude (ATD), subjective norm (SN), and perceived behavioral control (PBC)), one mediating variables (i.e., SA) and two dependent variables (i.e., behavioral intention (BI) and unsafe behaviors (BE)). Finally, this hypothetical model was analyzed with the data resources from extended TPB questionnaire of 295 pilots. Analysis results show that relationships of causation and mediation in the cognitive mechanism are in line with the behavior pattern and SA have a pronounced mediating effect and a strong relevance to the causal chain of extended TPB framework. This study integrated the SA three-level model to understand the motivation–cognition–action–feedback (MCAF) mechanism of pilots’ unsafe behaviors under cognitive mode of information processing through structural model. It would make a valuable contribution to the assessment and intervention of safety behaviors, and provide a basic framework for monitoring the situation awareness of pilot by man-machine interactive measurement technology in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaoqi Jiang & Weijiong Chen & Yutao Kang & Jiahao Liu & Wanglai Kuang, 2021. "Identifying Cognitive Mechanism Underlying Situation Awareness of Pilots’ Unsafe Behaviors Using Quantitative Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3052-:d:517847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3052/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3052/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Bond & Simon Cooper, 2006. "Modelling emergency decisions: recognition‐primed decision making. The literature in relation to an ophthalmic critical incident," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(8), pages 1023-1032, August.
    2. Bing Wu & Xinping Yan & Yang Wang & C. Guedes Soares, 2017. "An Evidential Reasoning‐Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1936-1957, October.
    3. Patriarca, Riccardo & Ramos, Marilia & Paltrinieri, Nicola & Massaiu, Salvatore & Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Boring, Ronald Laurids, 2020. "Human reliability analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Pi-Yueh Cheng & Mei-Chin Chu, 2014. "Behavioral Factors Affecting Students’ Intentions to Enroll in Business Ethics Courses: A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory Using Self-Identity as a Moderator," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 35-46, September.
    5. Bye, Rolf J. & Aalberg, Asbjørn L., 2018. "Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 174-186.
    6. Guo, Shengyu & Zhou, Xinyu & Tang, Bing & Gong, Peisong, 2020. "Exploring the behavioral risk chains of accidents using complex network theory in the construction industry," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    7. Darbra, R.M. & Crawford, J.F.E. & Haley, C.W. & Morrison, R.J., 2007. "Safety culture and hazard risk perception of Australian and New Zealand maritime pilots," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 736-745, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vytautas Paulauskas & Viktoras Senčila & Donatas Paulauskas & Martynas Simutis, 2023. "Impact of Port Shallowness (Clearance under the Ship’s Keel) on Shipping Safety, Energy Consumption and Sustainability of Green Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Vytautas Paulauskas & Donatas Paulauskas, 2024. "Dependence of Ships Turning at Port Turning Basins on Clearance under the Ship’s Keel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Montewka, Jakub & Manderbacka, Teemu & Ruponen, Pekka & Tompuri, Markus & Gil, Mateusz & Hirdaris, Spyros, 2022. "Accident susceptibility index for a passenger ship-a framework and case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    4. Lan, He & Ma, Xiaoxue & Qiao, Weiliang & Deng, Wanyi, 2023. "Determining the critical risk factors for predicting the severity of ship collision accidents using a data-driven approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Yu, Qing & Teixeira, Ângelo Palos & Liu, Kezhong & Rong, Hao & Guedes Soares, Carlos, 2021. "An integrated dynamic ship risk model based on Bayesian Networks and Evidential Reasoning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    7. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan, 2022. "An extended HEART Dempster–Shafer evidence theory approach to assess human reliability for the gas freeing process on chemical tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Yuga Raju Gunda & Suprakash Gupta & Lalit Kumar Singh, 2023. "Assessing human performance and human reliability: a review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(3), pages 817-828, June.
    10. Wang, Lei & Liu, Qing & Dong, Shiyu & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Selection of countermeasure portfolio for shipping safety with consideration of investment risk aversion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Zhang, Yang & Sun, Xukai & Chen, Jihong & Cheng, Cheng, 2021. "Spatial patterns and characteristics of global maritime accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Wenxin Su & Xin Gao & Yukun Jiang & Jinrong Li, 2021. "Developing a Construction Safety Standard System to Enhance Safety Supervision Efficiency in China: A Theoretical Simulation of the Evolutionary Game Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    15. Zhou, Yusheng & Li, Xue & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Holistic risk assessment of container shipping service based on Bayesian Network Modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    16. Cai, Mingyou & Zhang, Jinfen & Zhang, Di & Yuan, Xiaoli & Soares, C. Guedes, 2021. "Collision risk analysis on ferry ships in Jiangsu Section of the Yangtze River based on AIS data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Wang, Likun & Yang, Zaili, 2018. "Bayesian network modelling and analysis of accident severity in waterborne transportation: A case study in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 277-289.
    18. Cai Li & Majid Murad & Sheikh Farhan Ashraf, 2023. "The Influence of Women’s Green Entrepreneurial Intention on Green Entrepreneurial Behavior through University and Social Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Bing Wu & Huibin Tian & Xinping Yan & C. Guedes Soares, 2020. "A probabilistic consequence estimation model for collision accidents in the downstream of Yangtze River using Bayesian Networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 422-436, April.
    20. Adland, Roar & Jia, Haiying & Lode, Tønnes & Skontorp, Jørgen, 2021. "The value of meteorological data in marine risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3052-:d:517847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.