IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1822-d498860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Predicts Adherence to Governmental COVID-19 Measures among Danish Students?

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff

    (Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
    Unit for Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Hospital South West Jutland, 5000 Odense, Denmark)

  • Julie Dalgaard Guldager

    (Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
    Research Department, University College South Denmark, 6100 Haderslev, Denmark)

  • Pernille Tanggaard Andersen

    (Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

  • Christiane Stock

    (Unit for Health Promotion Research, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
    Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Berlin Institute of Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Signe Smith Jervelund

    (Department of Public Health, Section for Health Services Research, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Knowledge on compliance with governmental recommendations in combating the spread of COVID-19 in different groups is important to target efforts. This study investigated the adherence to the governmental implemented COVID-19 measures and its predictors in Danish university students, a not-at-risk group for COVID-19 mortality and normally characterized by many social contacts. As part of the COVID-19 International Student Wellbeing Study, a survey on socio-demographic situation, study information, living arrangements, lifestyle behaviors, stress, questions about COVID-19 infection and knowledge and concern about COVID-19 infection was sent via email to relevant university students in Denmark in May, 2020 ( n = 2.945). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was employed. Our results showed that around 60% of the students were not concerned about COVID-19, while 68% reported that they followed governmental measures. The main facilitators for following the recommendations were older age, concern about COVID-19 and depression, while barriers were living in a student hall, being physical active or reporting mental stress. Only 9% of the variation in adhering to governmental recommendations could be explained by the analyzed predictors. Results may inform health communication. Emotionally appealing information rather than knowledge-based information may be more effective in motivating students to follow COVID-19 measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff & Julie Dalgaard Guldager & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen & Christiane Stock & Signe Smith Jervelund, 2021. "What Predicts Adherence to Governmental COVID-19 Measures among Danish Students?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1822-:d:498860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1822/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1822/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwartz, Carolyn E. & Sprangers, Mirjam A. G., 1999. "Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(11), pages 1531-1548, June.
    2. Yanmengqian Zhou & Erina L. MacGeorge & Jessica Gall Myrick, 2020. "Mental Health and Its Predictors during the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic Experience in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juvalta, Sibylle & Speranza, Camilla & Robin, Dominik & El Maohub, Yassmeen & Krasselt, Julia & Dreesen, Philipp & Dratva, Julia & Suggs, L. Suzanne, 2023. "Young people's media use and adherence to preventive measures in the “infodemic”: Is it masked by political ideology?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    2. Julia Ballmann & Stefanie M. Helmer & Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff & Julie Dalgaard Guldager & Signe Smith Jervelund & Heide Busse & Claudia R. Pischke & Sarah Negash & Claus Wendt & Christiane Stock, 2022. "Is Lower Trust in COVID-19 Regulations Associated with Academic Frustration? A Comparison between Danish and German University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Jens Fyhn Lykke Sørensen & Maiken Christiansen, 2022. "The Role of Economic Stress, Health Concerns, and Institutional Trust in Supporting Public Protests against COVID-19 Lockdown Measures in Denmark," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Marco D’Addario & Roberta Adorni & Patrizia Steca & Roberto Capelli & Francesco Zanatta & Francesco Fattirolli & Cristina Franzelli & Cristina Giannattasio & Andrea Greco, 2022. "Associations between Lifestyle Changes and Adherence to COVID-19 Restrictions in Older Adults with Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Badr K. Aldhmadi & Rakesh Kumar & Ramaiah Itumalla & Bilesha Perera, 2021. "Depressive Symptomatology and Practice of Safety Measures among Undergraduate Students during COVID-19: Impact of Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-9, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nick Bansback & Huiying Sun & Daphne P. Guh & Xin Li & Bohdan Nosyk & Susan Griffin & Paul G. Barnett & Aslam H. Anis, 2008. "Impact of the recall period on measuring health utilities for acute events," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(12), pages 1413-1419.
    2. Patricia Cubí‐Mollá & Mireia Jofre‐Bonet & Victoria Serra‐Sastre, 2017. "Adaptation to health states: Sick yet better off?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 1826-1843, December.
    3. Damschroder, Laura J. & Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. & Ubel, Peter A., 2005. "The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 267-277, July.
    4. Mohamed Boucekine & Laurent Boyer & Karine Baumstarck & Aurelie Millier & Badih Ghattas & Pascal Auquier & Mondher Toumi, 2015. "Exploring the Response Shift Effect on the Quality of Life of Patients with Schizophrenia," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(3), pages 388-397, April.
    5. Astrid Wahl & Tone Rustøen & Berit Hanestad & Eva Gjengedal & Torbjørn Moum, 2005. "Self-Efficacy, Pulmonary Function, Perceived Health and Global Quality of Life of Cystic Fibrosis Patients," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 239-261, June.
    6. Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare & Elizabeth Thomas & Jacquita S. Affandi & Myles Schammer & Paul Brown & Matthew Pilbeam & Chris Harris & Chris Ellison & Dominika Kwasnicka & Daniel Powell & Christopher , 2021. "Mental Well-Being during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study of Fly-In Fly-Out Workers in the Mining Industry in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Rasolofoson, Ranaivo A. & Nielsen, Martin R. & Jones, Julia P.G., 2018. "The potential of the Global Person Generated Index for evaluating the perceived impacts of conservation interventions on subjective well-being," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 107-118.
    8. Sor Tho Ng & Nai Peng Tey & M Niaz Asadullah, 2017. "What matters for life satisfaction among the oldest-old? Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Blome, Christine & Augustin, Matthias, 2016. "Measuring change in subjective wellbeing: Methods to quantify recall bias and recalibration response shift," hche Research Papers 12, University of Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (hche).
    10. Carolyn Schwartz & Penelope Keyl & John Marcum & Rita Bode, 2009. "Helping Others Shows Differential Benefits on Health and Well-being for Male and Female Teens," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 431-448, August.
    11. Nick Bansback & Huiying Sun & Daphne P. Guh & Xin Li & Bohdan Nosyk & Susan Griffin & Paul G. Barnett & Aslam H. Anis, 2008. "Impact of the recall period on measuring health utilities for acute events," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(12), pages 1413-1419, December.
    12. Reto Odermatt & Alois Stutzer, 2019. "(Mis-)Predicted Subjective Well-Being Following Life Events," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 245-283.
    13. Sandy Laham & Leticia Bertuzzi & Séverine Deguen & Irwin Hecker & Maria Melchior & Martina Patanè & Irene Pinucci & Marit Sijbrandij & Judith van der Waerden, 2021. "Impact of Longitudinal Social Support and Loneliness Trajectories on Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Laura Camfield & Kaneta Choudhury & Joe Devine, 2009. "Well-being, Happiness and Why Relationships Matter: Evidence from Bangladesh," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 71-91, March.
    15. repec:zbw:rwirep:0297 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Aidan Bodner & Leo Ruhl & Emily Barr & Arti Shridhar & Shayna Skakoon-Sparling & Kiffer George Card, 2022. "The Impact of Working from Home on Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study of Canadian Worker’s Mental Health during the Third Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Valentina Piwowar & Felicitas Thiel, 2014. "Evaluating Response Shift in Training Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(5), pages 420-448, October.
    18. Thérèse Shaw & Donna Cross & Stephen R. Zubrick, 2015. "Testing for Response Shift Bias in Evaluations of School Antibullying Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 39(6), pages 527-554, December.
    19. Marcus Klemm, 2011. "You Don‘t Know what You‘ve got till It‘s Gone! Unemployment and Intertemporal Changes in Self-Reported Life Satisfaction," Ruhr Economic Papers 0297, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Klemm, Marcus, 2011. "You Don't Know what You've got till It's Gone! Unemployment and Intertemporal Changes in Self-Reported Life Satisfaction," Ruhr Economic Papers 297, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    21. Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2017. "Subjective Well-Being and Public Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 11102, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1822-:d:498860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.