IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1554-d494640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safe by Design Regulation for Academic Experimentation and Value Conflicts: An Exploration of Solution Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Georgy Ishmaev

    (Department of Software Technology, EEMCS, TU Delft, 2628 XE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Pieter E. Vermaas

    (Department of Ethics/Philosophy of Technology, TU Delft, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Dick Hoeneveld

    (Department of Safety and Security Science, TU Delft, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Pieter van Gelder

    (Department of Safety and Security Science, TU Delft, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

In this paper, we explore solution directions for the implementation of Safe by Design (SbD) in safety regimes for academic experimentation. SbD is a dynamic and anticipatory strategy for safety regulation in academic research. In this strategy, safety is taken in a broader sense including not only issues of technical precaution of avoiding risks of experimentation but also the societal responsibility of researchers and research institutes of identifying possible future risks. In our research, we have interviewed academic researchers from different disciplines and university support personnel about the factors that enable and limit the possibilities of researchers to implement SbD in safety regimes for experimentation. We articulate our findings in terms of a core set of research values and in terms of conflicts between safety and these research values. And we argue that tools for resolving value conflicts as originating in design for values research can provide directions to solve the value conflicts, and thus help academic researchers to adopt SbD in their experimentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgy Ishmaev & Pieter E. Vermaas & Dick Hoeneveld & Pieter van Gelder, 2021. "Safe by Design Regulation for Academic Experimentation and Value Conflicts: An Exploration of Solution Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1554-:d:494640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geuna, Aldo (ed.), 2015. "Global Mobility of Research Scientists," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780128013960.
    2. Möller, Niklas & Hansson, Sven Ove, 2008. "Principles of engineering safety: Risk and uncertainty reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(6), pages 798-805.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sam Jan Cees Krouwel & Emma Rianne Dierickx & Sara Heesterbeek & Pim Klaassen, 2022. "Adopting Safe-by-Design in Science and Engineering Academia: The Soil May Need Tilling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Park & T. P. Seager & P. S. C. Rao & M. Convertino & I. Linkov, 2013. "Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 356-367, March.
    2. Orazbayev, Sultan, 2017. "International knowledge flows and the administrative barriers to mobility," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1655-1665.
    3. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Haddawy, Peter & Cicero, Tindaro & Hassan, Saeed-Ul, 2017. "The solitude of stars. An analysis of the distributed excellence model of European universities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 435-454.
    4. Shibayama, Sotaro, 2019. "Sustainable development of science and scientists: Academic training in life science labs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 676-692.
    5. Jeongeun Kim & Molly Ott & Lindsey Dippold, 2020. "University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 197-228, March.
    6. Jorge Nogueira de Paiva Britto & Leonardo Costa Ribeiro & Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque, 2021. "Global systems of innovation: introductory notes on a new layer and a new hierarchy in innovation systems," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2-3), pages 259-279, September.
    7. Sari Pekkala Kerr & William Kerr & Çağlar Özden & Christopher Parsons, 2016. "Global Talent Flows," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 83-106, Fall.
    8. Daniel Eisenberg & Thomas Seager & David L. Alderson, 2019. "Rethinking Resilience Analytics," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1870-1884, September.
    9. Roman Fudickar & Hanna Hottenrott & Cornelia Lawson, 2018. "What’s the price of academic consulting? Effects of public and private sector consulting on academic research," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(4), pages 699-722.
    10. Sari Pekkala Kerr & William Kerr & Çağlar Özden & Christopher Parsons, 2017. "High-Skilled Migration and Agglomeration," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 201-234, September.
    11. Raquel Carrasco & Javier Ruiz-Castillo, 2019. "Spatial mobility in elite academic institutions in economics: the case of Spain," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 141-172, June.
    12. Cong Cao & Jeroen Baas & Caroline S Wagner & Koen Jonkers, 2020. "Returning scientists and the emergence of China’s science system," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 172-183.
    13. Pierre Deschamps, 2018. "Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?," Sciences Po publications 82, Sciences Po.
    14. Sari Pekkala Kerr & William R. Kerr, 2018. "Global Collaborative Patents," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 235-272, July.
    15. Nicolai Netz & Steffen Jaksztat, 2017. "Explaining Scientists’ Plans for International Mobility from a Life Course Perspective," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(5), pages 497-519, August.
    16. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2017_003 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Chenhui Hu & Haining Jiang, 2021. "Causal Nexus between Sci-Tech Talent and Economic Growth in the Pan-Yangtze River Delta of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Fudickar, Roman & Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2016. "What's the price of consulting? Effects of public and private sector consulting on academic research," DICE Discussion Papers 212, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    19. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2017_002 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Carolina Cañibano & Richard Woolley & Eric J. Iversen & Sybille Hinze & Stefan Hornbostel & Jakob Tesch, 2019. "A conceptual framework for studying science research careers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1964-1992, December.
    21. Junwan Liu & Rui Wang & Shuo Xu, 2021. "What academic mobility configurations contribute to high performance: an fsQCA analysis of CSC-funded visiting scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1079-1100, February.
    22. Zhu, Andy Yunlong & von Zedtwitz, Max & Assimakopoulos, Dimitris & Fernandes, Kiran, 2016. "The impact of organizational culture on Concurrent Engineering, Design-for-Safety, and product safety performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 69-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1554-:d:494640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.