IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10832-d656970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships, Decisions, and Physical Effort in the Marro Traditional Sporting Game: A Multimodal Approach

Author

Listed:
  • David Martín-Martínez

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Pere Lavega-Burgués

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Cristòfol Salas-Santandreu

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Conxita Duran-Delgado

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Queralt Prat

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Sabrine Damian-Silva

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Leonardo Machado

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Pablo Aires-Araujo

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Verónica Muñoz-Arroyave

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Manuel Lapuente-Sagarra

    (Smart Performance & Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
    Development & Innovation on Conditioning & Exercise (DICFE) Research Group, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida (UdL), 2192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Jorge Serna

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), INDEST, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, 25192 Lleida, Spain)

  • Miguel Pic

    (Motor Action Research Group (GIAM), South Ural State University Chelyabinsk, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the players’ decisions-making in Marro (a Traditional Sporting Game) through a multimodal approach. Each player’s decision-making assumes specific accelerations and decelerations associated with different effort. The research objectives were: (i) to study the decision-making associated with the roles of Hunter and Hare; (ii) to know the physical effort by the roles (Hunters and Hares); (iii) to reveal T-Patterns in the multimodal strategic approach (integrated with decisions and different physical effort) with a direct incidence on the scoring by roles. The study was performed with 22 male and 2 female players aged 18 to 25 (M = 19.4; SD = 1.3). The Marro game was played by two groups for eight minutes. An observational methodology was used, through a type III design. The observational design was nomothetic, one-time, and multidimensional. An ‘ad hoc’ tool was built to ensure the data quality. Univariate analyses were performed using Crosstabs Command, with adjusted residuals (AR), Classification Trees (Chaid model) and T-Pattern Analysis (TPA). Significant differences were found between matches using the scoring ( p < 0.001; ES = 0.26), role ( p < 0.001; ES = 0.31), or the organic variables of the study, the speed ( p < 0.001; ES = 0.73), the metabolic power and the acceleration/deceleration the speed ( p = 0.023; ES = 0.43), while the predictive model pointed to the variable role ( p < 0.001) as the main factor responsible for the model growth. TPA ( p < 0.005) revealed differences attributable to internal logic in the yellow (first match) and orange (second match) teams, while organic variables were more changeable in the violet (first match) and green (second match) teams. This study advances the individualization of the decision-making process. These results may be useful to better understand the internal of functioning of the Marro game 360° since the use of various methodologies and variables (multimodal approach) provided original findings.

Suggested Citation

  • David Martín-Martínez & Pere Lavega-Burgués & Cristòfol Salas-Santandreu & Conxita Duran-Delgado & Queralt Prat & Sabrine Damian-Silva & Leonardo Machado & Pablo Aires-Araujo & Verónica Muñoz-Arroyave, 2021. "Relationships, Decisions, and Physical Effort in the Marro Traditional Sporting Game: A Multimodal Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10832-:d:656970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10832/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10832/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Oboeuf & Luc Collard & Benoît Gerard, 2008. "Le jeu de la " balle assise " : un substitut au questionnaire sociométrique ?," Post-Print halshs-00733703, HAL.
    2. Moez Limayem & Gerardine DeSanctis, 2000. "Providing Decisional Guidance for Multicriteria Decision Making in Groups," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 386-401, December.
    3. M. Teresa Anguera & Angel Blanco-Villaseñor & José Luis Losada & Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, 2018. "Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2757-2770, November.
    4. Verónica Muñoz-Arroyave & Miguel Pic & Rafael Luchoro-Parrilla & Jorge Serna & Cristòfol Salas-Santandreu & Sabrine Damian-Silva & Leonardo Machado & Rosa Rodríguez-Arregi & Queralt Prat & Conxita Dur, 2021. "Promoting Interpersonal Relationships through Elbow Tag, a Traditional Sporting Game. A Multidimensional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.
    2. Ujwal Kayande & Arnaud De Bruyn & Gary L. Lilien & Arvind Rangaswamy & Gerrit H. van Bruggen, 2009. "How Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms in a DSS Affects DSS Evaluations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 527-546, December.
    3. Rubén Maneiro & José Luís Losada & Mariona Portell & Antonio Ardá, 2021. "Observational Analysis of Corner Kicks in High-Level Football: A Mixed Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Anna M. Sene-Mir & Mariona Portell & M. Teresa Anguera & Salvador Chacón-Moscoso, 2020. "Manual Material Handling Training: The Effect of Self-Observation, Hetero-Observational and Intrinsic Feedback on Workers’ Knowledge and Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Aloysius, John A. & Davis, Fred D. & Wilson, Darryl D. & Ross Taylor, A. & Kottemann, Jeffrey E., 2006. "User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: The impact of preference elicitation techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 273-285, February.
    6. Giampiero E.G. Beroggi, 2003. "Internet Multiattribute Group Decision Support in Electronic Commerce," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 481-499, November.
    7. Macarena Valenzuela-Zubiaur & Héctor Torres-Bustos & Mónica Arroyo-Vázquez & Pablo Ferrer-Gisbert, 2021. "Promotion of Social Innovation through Fab Labs. The Case of ProteinLab UTEM in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Ivo Blohm & Christoph Riedl & Johann Füller & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2016. "Rate or Trade? Identifying Winning Ideas in Open Idea Sourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 27-48, March.
    9. Hayashida, Tomohiro & Nishizaki, Ichiro & Ueda, Yoshifumi, 2010. "Multiattribute utility analysis for policy selection and financing for the preservation of the forest," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 833-843, February.
    10. Bigne, Enrique & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Ruiz, Carla, 2020. "Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 403-416.
    11. Dominik Dellermann & Nikolaus Lipusch & Philipp Ebel & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Design principles for a hybrid intelligence decision support system for business model validation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 423-441, September.
    12. Rudolf Vetschera, 2005. "Strategic Manipulation of Preference Information in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Methods," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 393-414, September.
    13. Chiva-Bartoll, Oscar & Maravé-Vivas, María & Salvador-García, Celina & Valverde-Esteve, Teresa, 2021. "Impact of a physical education service-learning programme on ASD children: A mixed-methods approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Hassan Ait Haddou & Guy Camilleri & Pascale Zaraté, 2014. "Prediction of Ideas Number During a Brainstorming Session," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 271-298, March.
    15. Caitlyn S. White & Erica Spry & Emma Griffiths & Emma Carlin, 2021. "Equity in Access: A Mixed Methods Exploration of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Access Program for the Kimberley Region, Western Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Clayton Arlen Looney & Andrew M. Hardin, 2009. "Decision Support for Retirement Portfolio Management: Overcoming Myopic Loss Aversion via Technology Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1688-1703, October.
    17. Joseph Friedman & George Karandinos & Laurie Kain Hart & Fernando Montero Castrillo & Nicholas Graetz & Philippe Bourgois, 2019. "Structural vulnerability to narcotics-driven firearm violence: An ethnographic and epidemiological study of Philadelphia’s Puerto Rican inner-city," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, November.
    18. Celia Camilli Trujillo & Laura Cuervo Calvo & Desirée García Gil & Carolina Bonastre Valles, 2022. "Mixed methods research in service-learning: an integrative systematic review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2361-2386, August.
    19. A. Adla & P. Zarate & J.-L. Soubie, 2011. "A Proposal of Toolkit for GDSS Facilitators," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-77, January.
    20. Lei Zhu & Izak Benbasat & Zhenhui Jiang, 2010. "Let's Shop Online Together: An Empirical Investigation of Collaborative Online Shopping Support," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 872-891, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10832-:d:656970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.