IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0289025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussing blockchain applications in TED Talks: A fashion wave approach to understanding the blockchain phenomenon

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Bonazzi
  • Heidi Gautschi
  • Gianluigi Viscusi

Abstract

Since its first appearance as the infrastructure supporting Bitcoin, blockchain has received different waves of attention from practitioners and academics. Besides the degree of interest, the attention to blockchain has often focused not merely on its own potential and characteristics but on its applications field. However, looking at its application and deployment in domains other than cryptocurrency or the nascent non-fungible tokens (NFTs), blockchain technology does not seem to be widely adopted or is still in its early stages. Given this, we are interested in how managers and the general public are informed about new technology other than through academic papers or the specialized press. In this paper, we analyze how blockchain has been presented by speakers invited to give TED and TEDx Talks to identify the most common terms used to present blockchain in these talks using a multi-methods approach (qualitative analysis and big data analysis) and see if the discourse surrounding blockchain has shifted over time. The results of this study show how the different perspectives brought by broadcasters like TED often overshadow a technological innovation like the blockchain in its evolution and application by the fact that the focus is instead shifted to products and services built on it. Also, this study shows how different degrees of attention and expertise are associated with each fashion wave of new or emergent technology innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Bonazzi & Heidi Gautschi & Gianluigi Viscusi, 2023. "Discussing blockchain applications in TED Talks: A fashion wave approach to understanding the blockchain phenomenon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289025
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289025
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0289025&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0289025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chalmers, Dominic & Fisch, Christian & Matthews, Russell & Quinn, William & Recker, Jan, 2022. "Beyond the bubble: Will NFTs and digital proof of ownership empower creative industry entrepreneurs?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    2. Paulo Rupino da Cunha & Piotr Soja & Marinos Themistocleous, 2021. "Blockchain for development: a guiding framework," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 417-438, July.
    3. repec:hal:journl:hal-02312189 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. M. Teresa Anguera & Angel Blanco-Villaseñor & José Luis Losada & Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, 2018. "Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2757-2770, November.
    5. Jean S. Clarke & Joep P. Cornelissen & Mark Healey, 2019. "Actions Speak Louder than Words : How Figurative Language and Gesturing in Entrepreneurial Pitches Influences Investment Judgments," Post-Print hal-02276704, HAL.
    6. Geoff Walsham, 2006. "Doing interpretive research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 320-330, June.
    7. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Sen & Chen, Yan, 2024. "Governing decentralized autonomous organizations as digital commons," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    2. Patrick Nicolas Tinguely & Yash Raj Shrestha, 2024. "NFT-enabled organization design: prospects, promises and hurdles," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 13(1), pages 23-31, March.
    3. Komulainen, Ruey & Nätti, Satu, 2023. "Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Zhang, Yan & Zhou, Xiaohu & Zhang, Hui & Khanagha, Saeed, 2025. "Mechanisms of vision communication and employees’ change-supportive behavior from the perspective of expectancy theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Kirimhan, Destan, 2023. "Importance of anti-money laundering regulations among prosumers for a cybersecure decentralized finance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Arvin Sahaym & Joseph Vithayathil & Suprateek Sarker & Saonee Sarker & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2023. "Value Destruction in Information Technology Ecosystems: A Mixed-Method Investigation with Interpretive Case Study and Analytical Modeling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 508-531, June.
    7. McSweeney, Jordan J. & McSweeney, Kevin T. & Webb, Justin W. & Devers, Cynthia E., 2022. "The right touch of pitch assertiveness: Examining entrepreneurs' gender and project category fit in crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    8. Werner Liebregts & Pourya Darnihamedani & Eric Postma & Martin Atzmueller, 2020. "The promise of social signal processing for research on decision-making in entrepreneurial contexts," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 589-605, October.
    9. Monideepa Tarafdar & Guohou Shan & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1490-1510, December.
    10. Lavaei Adaryani, Rasool & Palouj, Mojtaba & Karbasioun, Mostafa & Asadi, Ali & Gholami, Hesamedin & Kianirad, Ali & Joodi Damirchi, Milad, 2024. "Antecedents of blockchain adoption in the poultry supply chain: An extended UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Gala, Kaushik, 2024. "Digital Davids, global Goliaths, and the Web3 sling," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 5-17.
    12. Antsipava, Dasha & Strycharz, Joanna & van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & van Noort, Guda, 2024. "What drives blockchain technology adoption in the online advertising ecosystem? An interview study into stakeholders’ perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Zhang, Ying & Gong, Bing & Zhou, Peng, 2024. "Centralized use of decentralized technology: Tokenization of currencies and assets," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 15-25.
    14. Mayank Joshipura & Rim El Khoury & Muneer M. Alshater, 2025. "ICOs conceptual unveiled: scholarly review of an entrepreneurial finance innovation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-47, December.
    15. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Raghu Garud & Nelson Phillips, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Framing: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 578-606, May.
    16. Lane, Julie & Manceau, Luiza Maria & de Chantal, Pier-Luc & Chagnon, Alexandre & Cardinal, Michael & Lauzier-Jobin, François & Lanoue, Sèverine, 2024. "Implementing a mental health app library in primary care: A feasibility study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Greg Fisher & Emily Neubert, 2023. "Evaluating Ventures Fast and Slow: Sensemaking, Intuition, and Deliberation in Entrepreneurial Resource Provision Decisions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1298-1326, July.
    18. Anton Miglo, 2022. "Theories of Crowdfunding and Token Issues: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
    19. Michael Weber & Martin Engert & Norman Schaffer & Jörg Weking & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Organizational Capabilities for AI Implementation—Coping with Inscrutability and Data Dependency in AI," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1549-1569, August.
    20. Horky, Florian & Dubbick, Lili & Rhein, Franziska & Fidrmuc, Jarko, 2023. "Don't miss out on NFTs?! A sentiment-based analysis of the early NFT market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 799-814.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0289025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.