IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i1p357-d475176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption across North America: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Comparison of Dietary Recalls from Canada, Mexico, and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah M. Frank

    (Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
    Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • Lindsay M. Jaacks

    (Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, Easter Bush Campus, The University of Edinburgh, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK)

  • Carolina Batis

    (CONACYT—Health and Nutrition Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad No. 655 Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico)

  • Lana Vanderlee

    (Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), L’École de Nutrition, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC GIV 0A6, Canada)

  • Lindsey Smith Taillie

    (Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
    Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

Abstract

Close economic ties encourage production and trade of meat between Canada, Mexico, and the US. Understanding the patterns of red and processed meat consumption in North America may inform policies designed to reduce meat consumption and bolster environmental and public health efforts across the continent. We used nationally-representative cross-sectional survey data to analyze consumption of unprocessed red meat; processed meat; and total red and processed meat. Generalized linear models were used to separately estimate probability of consumption and adjusted mean intake. Prevalence of total meat consumers was higher in the US (73.6, 95% CI: 72.3–74.8%) than in Canada (65.6, 63.9–67.2%) or Mexico (62.7, 58.1–67.2%). Men were more likely to consume unprocessed red, processed, and total meat, and had larger estimated intakes. In Mexico, high wealth individuals were more likely to consume all three categories of meat. In the US and Canada, those with high education were less likely to consume total and processed meat. Estimated mean intake of unprocessed red, processed, and total meat did not differ across sociodemographic strata. Overall consumption of red and processed meat remains high in North America. Policies to reduce meat consumption are appropriate for all three countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah M. Frank & Lindsay M. Jaacks & Carolina Batis & Lana Vanderlee & Lindsey Smith Taillie, 2021. "Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption across North America: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Comparison of Dietary Recalls from Canada, Mexico, and the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:357-:d:475176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Rozin & Julia M. Hormes & Myles S. Faith & Brian Wansink, 2012. "Is Meat Male? A Quantitative Multimethod Framework to Establish Metaphoric Relationships," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 629-643.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Merida, Vincent Elijiah & Cook, David & Ögmundarson, Ólafur & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur, 2022. "Ecosystem services and disservices of meat and dairy production: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herziger, Atar & Claborn, Kelly A. & Brooks, Jeremy S., 2020. "Is There Hope for the Double Dividend? How Social Context Can Shape Synergies and Tradeoffs between Sustainable Consumption and Well-Being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Katherine Farrow & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2018. "What in the Word! The Scope for the Effect of Word Choice on Economic Behavior," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 557-580, November.
    3. Friederike Elsner & Lea Ellen Matthiessen & Dominika Średnicka-Tober & Wolfgang Marx & Adrienne O’Neil & Ailsa A. Welch & Richard Peter Hayhoe & Suzanne Higgs & Marja van Vliet & Ephimia Morphew-Lu & , 2022. "Identifying Future Study Designs for Mental Health and Social Wellbeing Associated with Diets of a Cohort Living in Eco-Regions: Findings from the INSUM Expert Workshop," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Dengfeng Yan, 2016. "Numbers Are Gendered: The Role of Numerical Precision," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 303-316.
    5. Einhorn, Laura, 2020. "Normative social influence on meat consumption," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Frédéric Vandermoere & Robbe Geerts & Charlotte De Backer & Sara Erreygers & Els Van Doorslaer, 2019. "Meat Consumption and Vegaphobia: An Exploration of the Characteristics of Meat Eaters, Vegaphobes, and Their Social Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Florence Jeannot & Eline Jongmans & Maud Dampérat, 2022. "Design visuel et expérience d’achat en ligne : quand l’expertise permet aux consommateurs de se (re)centrer sur l’attractivité du site d’e-commerce," Post-Print halshs-04159585, HAL.
    8. Techawachirakul, Monin & Pathak, Abhishek & Motoki, Kosuke & Anne Calvert, Gemma, 2023. "Sonic branding of meat- and plant-based foods: The role of timbre," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Florence Jeannot & Eline Jongmans & Maud Dampérat, 2022. "Visual design and online shopping experiences: When expertise allows consumers to refocus on website attractiveness," Post-Print halshs-04159592, HAL.
    10. Debucquet, Gervaise & Lombart, Cindy & Labbé-Pinlon, Blandine, 2021. "Depicting eaters and non-eaters of abnormal fruits and vegetables: Reflections of self-identity and food culture," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Tamara M. Pfeiler & Boris Egloff, 2017. "Examining the “Veggie” Personality: Results from a Representative German Sample," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 941, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. Lembregts, Christophe & Cadario, Romain, 2024. "Consumer-Driven Climate Mitigation: Exploring Barriers and Solutions in Studying Higher Mitigation Potential Behaviors," OSF Preprints ywus6, Center for Open Science.
    13. Jacob Suher & Raj Raghunathan & Wayne D. Hoyer, 2016. "Eating Healthy or Feeling Empty? How the "Healthy = Less Filling" Intuition Influences Satiety," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 26-40.
    14. Magdalena Weber & Marlene Kollmayer, 2022. "Psychological Processes Underlying an Omnivorous, Vegetarian, or Vegan Diet: Gender Role Self-Concept, Human Supremacy Beliefs, and Moral Disengagement from Meat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Daniel Francisco Pais & António Cardoso Marques & José Alberto Fuinhas, 2023. "How to Promote Healthier and More Sustainable Food Choices: The Case of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Jana Friedrichsen & Manja Gärtner, 2020. "Warum essen wir so viel Fleisch?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 137, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Meier, Johanna & Andor, Mark A. & Doebbe, Friederike C. & Haddaway, Neal R. & Reisch, Lucia A., 2022. "Review: Do green defaults reduce meat consumption?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Klaudia Modlinska & Dominika Adamczyk & Dominika Maison & Wojciech Pisula, 2020. "Gender Differences in Attitudes to Vegans/Vegetarians and Their Food Preferences, and Their Implications for Promoting Sustainable Dietary Patterns–A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Dan King & Sumitra Auschaitrakul & Chia-Wei Joy Lin, 2022. "Search modality effects: merely changing product search modality alters purchase intentions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1236-1256, November.
    20. Davis, Robert & McGinnis, Lee Phillip, 2016. "Conceptualizing excessive fan consumption behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 252-262.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:357-:d:475176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.