IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3230-d354524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Study to Explore Perception of Impacts of Preemption of Tobacco Regulation on Counties in Appalachian Tennessee

Author

Listed:
  • Hadii M. Mamudu

    (Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, P.O Box 70264, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

  • Fenose Osedeme

    (Department of Behavioral and Community Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, P.O Box 70264, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

  • Crystal Robertson

    (School of Plant Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA)

  • Mary Ann Littleton

    (Department of Behavioral and Community Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, P.O Box 70264, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

  • Daniel Owusu

    (Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (GSU TCORS), Georgia State University, Urban Life Building 850, 140 Decatur St, Atlanta, GA 30030, USA)

  • Liang Wang

    (Department of Biostatics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, P.O Box 70659, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

  • Donley T. Studlar

    (Department of Behavioral and Community Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, P.O Box 70264, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

Abstract

Bottom-up processes, starting at the local government level, are valuable for more-stringent tobacco control measures. The existence of industry-backed state-level tobacco control preemption in states has impeded policy progress within the state and localities/communities. A national public health goal under Healthy People 2020 is to eliminate state-level preemption across the United States. This study explored individual-level perceptions of the impact of state-level preemption in Appalachian Tennessee—a high-smoking, low-income region. During 2015–2016, a community-engagement project to develop a Population Health Improvement Plan (PHIP) involving over 200 stakeholders and 90 organizations was conducted in Appalachian Tennessee to identify policies/programs to address tobacco use. Using a multifaceted framework approach that focused on prevention, protection, and cessation, interviews and meeting discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Content analysis using NVivo 11 was conducted to generate themes. Although the central focus of the PHIP was not preemption, the issue emerged naturally in the discussions as a major concern among participants. Cultural and normative factors in Appalachian Tennessee were identified as key rationales for participants’ aversion to state preemption. Thus, repealing preemption would facilitate culturally tailored and region-specific policies/programs to the high tobacco use among Appalachian Tennessee communities where statewide/nationwide policies/programs have not had the intended impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadii M. Mamudu & Fenose Osedeme & Crystal Robertson & Mary Ann Littleton & Daniel Owusu & Liang Wang & Donley T. Studlar, 2020. "A Qualitative Study to Explore Perception of Impacts of Preemption of Tobacco Regulation on Counties in Appalachian Tennessee," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3230-:d:354524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferketich, A.K. & Liber, A. & Pennell, M. & Nealy, D. & Hammer, J. & Berman, M., 2010. "Clean indoor air ordinance coverage in the appalachian region of the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(7), pages 1313-1318.
    2. Pomeranz, J.L. & Pertschuk, M., 2017. "State preemption: A significant and quiet threat to public health in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(6), pages 900-902.
    3. Stark, M.J. & Rohde, K. & Maher, J.E. & Pizacani, B.A. & Dent, C.W. & Bard, R. & Carmella, S.G. & Benoit, A.R. & Thomson, N.M. & Hecht, S.S., 2007. "The impact of clean indoor air exemptions and preemption policies on the prevalence of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen among nonsmoking bar and restaurant workers," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(8), pages 1457-1463.
    4. Nixon, M L & Mahmoud, L & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "Tobacco industry litigation to deter local public health ordinances: the industry usually loses in court," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3217s0k3, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    5. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303756_4 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Charles R. Shipan & Craig Volden, 2006. "Bottom‐Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(4), pages 825-843, October.
    7. Shervin Assari & Ritesh Mistry, 2018. "Educational Attainment and Smoking Status in a National Sample of American Adults; Evidence for the Blacks’ Diminished Return," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srinivas C. Parinandi, 2020. "Policy Inventing and Borrowing among State Legislatures," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 852-868, October.
    2. Hafifa Siddiq & Babak Najand, 2022. "Immigration Status, Socioeconomic Status, and Self-Rated Health in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Shervin Assari & James Smith & Ritesh Mistry & Mehdi Farokhnia & Mohsen Bazargan, 2019. "Substance Use among Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults; Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Monica Hubbard & Luke Fowler, 2021. "Institutional Collective Action on Drugs: Functional and Vertical Dilemmas of Unused Pharmaceuticals," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(1), pages 76-96, January.
    5. Shervin Assari & Maryam Moghani Lankarani, 2018. "Educational Attainment Promotes Fruit and Vegetable Intake for Whites but Not Blacks," J, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Saatvika Rai, 2020. "Policy Adoption and Policy Intensity: Emergence of Climate Adaptation Planning in U.S. States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(4), pages 444-463, July.
    7. Yoonyoung Choi & Hui Zheng, 2023. "Onset and Cessation of Smoking: Temporal Dynamics and Racial Difference in Educational Smoking Disparities among Women," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(6), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Mohsen Bazargan & James L. Smith & Paul Robinson & John Uyanne & Ruqayyah Abdulrahoof & Chika Chuku & Shervin Assari, 2019. "Chronic Respiratory Disease and Health-Related Quality of Life of African American Older Adults in an Economically Disadvantaged Area of Los Angeles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Haupt, Wolfgang & Eckersley, Peter & Kern, Kristine, 2021. "Transfer und Skalierung von lokaler Klimapolitik: Konzeptionelle Ansätze, Voraussetzungen und Potenziale," IRS Dialog 1/2021, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    10. Zakharov, Nikita, 2020. "The protective effect of smoking against COVID-19: A population-based study using instrumental variables," MPRA Paper 101267, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Millimet, Daniel L., 2013. "Environmental Federalism: A Survey of the Empirical Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 7831, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Andrew Pickering & James Rockey, 2013. "Ideology and the size of US state government," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 443-465, September.
    13. Kai‐Wen Cheng & Feng Liu & MariaElena Gonzalez & Stanton Glantz, 2017. "The Effects of Workplace Clean Indoor Air Law Coverage on Workers' Smoking‐Related Outcomes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 226-242, February.
    14. Nathan M. Jensen Washington University, Rene Lindstadt, Trinity College Dublin, 2009. "Leaning Right and Learning from the Left: Diffusion of Corporate Tax Policy in the OECD," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp290, IIIS.
    15. Shervin Assari & James L. Smith & Marc A. Zimmerman & Mohsen Bazargan, 2019. "Cigarette Smoking among Economically Disadvantaged African-American Older Adults in South Los Angeles: Gender Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.
    16. James E. Monogan & David M. Konisky & Neal D. Woods, 2017. "Gone with the Wind: Federalism and the Strategic Location of Air Polluters," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 257-270, April.
    17. Volker Britz & Hans Gersbach, 2014. "Experimentation in Democratic Mechanisms," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 14/199, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    18. Daniel S. Feinberg, 2021. "What factors predict the quality of hazard mitigation plans in Washington State?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-29, January.
    19. Joseph G. L. Lee & Adam O. Goldstein & Leah M. Ranney & Jeff Crist & Anna McCullough, 2011. "High Tobacco Use among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations in West Virginian Bars and Community Festivals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Mariana Lopes da Fonseca, 2017. "Tax Mimicking in Local Business Taxation: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Portugal," CESifo Working Paper Series 6647, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3230-:d:354524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.