IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i6p916-d213802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Toxic Effect of Herbicidal Ionic Liquids on Biogas-Producing Microbial Community

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Czarny

    (Institute of Forensic Genetics, Al. Mickiewicza 3/4, 85-071 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Piotrowska-Cyplik

    (Institute of Food Technology of Plant Origin, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, 60-624 Poznan, Poland)

  • Andrzej Lewicki

    (Institute of Biosystem Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 50 Wojska Polskiego St., 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Zgoła-Grześkowiak

    (Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Łukasz Wolko

    (Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznan, Poland)

  • Natalia Galant

    (Institute of Forensic Genetics, Al. Mickiewicza 3/4, 85-071 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Anna Syguda

    (Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Paweł Cyplik

    (Department of Biotechnology and Food Microbiology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 48, 60-627 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of herbicidal ionic liquids on the population changes of microorganisms used in a batch anaerobic digester. The influence of the following ionic liquids: benzalkonium (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetate (BA)(2,4-D), benzalkonium (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetate (BA)(MCPA), didecyldimethylammonium (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetate (DDA)(2,4-D), didecyldimethylammonium (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetate (DDA)(MCPA), as well as reference herbicides (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid (MCPA) and (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) in the form of sodium salts on biogas production efficiency was investigated. The effective concentration (EC50) values were determined for all tested compounds. (MCPA) − was the most toxic, with an EC50 value of 38.6–41.2 mg/L. The EC50 for 2,4-D was 55.7–59.8 mg/L. The addition of the test substances resulted in changes of the population structure of the microbiota which formed the fermentation pulp. The research was based on 16S rDNA analysis with the use of the Next Generation Sequencing method and the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). There was a significant decrease in bacteria belonging to Firmicutes and Archaea belonging to Euryarchaeota . A significant decrease of the biodiversity of the methane fermentation microbiota was also established, which was expressed by the decrease of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and the value of Shannon’s entropy. In order to determine the functional potential of bacterial metapopulations based on the 16SrDNAprofile, the PICRUSt(Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States)tool was used, which allowed to determine the gene potency of microorganisms and their ability to biodegrade the herbicides. In the framework of the conducted analysis, no key genes related to the biodegradation of MCPA or 2,4-D were found, and the observed decrease of their content in the supernatant liquid was caused by their sorption on bacterial biomass.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Czarny & Agnieszka Piotrowska-Cyplik & Andrzej Lewicki & Agnieszka Zgoła-Grześkowiak & Łukasz Wolko & Natalia Galant & Anna Syguda & Paweł Cyplik, 2019. "The Toxic Effect of Herbicidal Ionic Liquids on Biogas-Producing Microbial Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:916-:d:213802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osorio, F. & Torres, J.C., 2009. "Biogas purification from anaerobic digestion in a wastewater treatment plant for biofuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2164-2171.
    2. Cieślik, Marta & Dach, Jacek & Lewicki, Andrzej & Smurzyńska, Anna & Janczak, Damian & Pawlicka-Kaczorowska, Joanna & Boniecki, Piotr & Cyplik, Paweł & Czekała, Wojciech & Jóźwiakowski, Krzysztof, 2016. "Methane fermentation of the maize straw silage under meso- and thermophilic conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P2), pages 1495-1502.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Jakub Frankowski & Wojciech Czekała, 2023. "Agricultural Plant Residues as Potential Co-Substrates for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Bidart, Christian & Fröhling, Magnus & Schultmann, Frank, 2014. "Electricity and substitute natural gas generation from the conversion of wastewater treatment plant sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 404-413.
    4. Bogusława Waliszewska & Mieczysław Grzelak & Eliza Gaweł & Agnieszka Spek-Dźwigała & Agnieszka Sieradzka & Wojciech Czekała, 2021. "Chemical Characteristics of Selected Grass Species from Polish Meadows and Their Potential Utilization for Energy Generation Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Tippayawong, N. & Thanompongchart, P., 2010. "Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4531-4535.
    6. Karol Kupryaniuk & Agnieszka Wójtowicz & Jakub Mazurkiewicz & Tomasz Słowik & Arkadiusz Matwijczuk, 2021. "The Influence of the Pressure-Thermal Agglomeration Methods of Corn Bran on Their Selected Physicochemical Properties and Biogas Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Andújar, J.M. & Segura, F. & Durán, E. & Rentería, L.A., 2011. "Optimal interface based on power electronics in distributed generation systems for fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2759-2770.
    8. Tom Karras & André Brosowski & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "A Review on Supply Costs and Prices of Residual Biomass in Techno-Economic Models for Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Chatree Wattanasilp & Roongrojana Songprakorp & Annop Nopharatana & Charoenchai Khompatraporn, 2021. "Techno-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Biogas Production from Industrial Cassava Starch Wastewater in Thailand for Optimal Utilization with Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Hashemi, Seyed Sajad & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora, 2019. "Hydrothermal pretreatment of safflower straw to enhance biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 545-554.
    11. Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Zaborowicz, Maciej & Czekała, Wojciech & Mazurkiewicz, Jakub & Mazur, Andrzej & Janczak, Damian & Marczuk, Andrzej & Dach, Jacek, 2020. "Energy value estimation of silages for substrate in biogas plants using an artificial neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. Vita, A. & Italiano, C. & Previtali, D. & Fabiano, C. & Palella, A. & Freni, F. & Bozzano, G. & Pino, L. & Manenti, F., 2018. "Methanol synthesis from biogas: A thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 673-684.
    13. Yun, Yeo-Myeong & Sung, Shihwu & Kang, Seoktae & Kim, Mi-Sun & Kim, Dong-Hoon, 2017. "Enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens by means of gas recycle and its application in biogas upgrading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 294-302.
    14. Jakub Frankowski & Maciej Zaborowicz & Jacek Dach & Wojciech Czekała & Jacek Przybył, 2020. "Biological Waste Management in the Case of a Pandemic Emergency and Other Natural Disasters. Determination of Bioenergy Production from Floricultural Waste and Modeling of Methane Production Using Dee," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Huang, Zhe & Lu, Lu & Jiang, Daqian & Xing, Defeng & Ren, Zhiyong Jason, 2017. "Electrochemical hythane production for renewable energy storage and biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 595-600.
    16. Kadam, Rahul & Panwar, N.L., 2017. "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 892-903.
    17. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2022. "Analysis of the Energy and Material Use of Manure as a Fertilizer or Substrate for Biogas Production during the Energy Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    19. Wojcieszak, Dawid & Przybył, Jacek & Myczko, Renata & Myczko, Andrzej, 2018. "Technological and energetic evaluation of maize stover silage for methane production on technical scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 903-912.
    20. Bharathiraja, B. & Sudharsana, T. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chozhavendhan, S. & Iyyappan, J., 2018. "Biogas production – A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 570-582.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:916-:d:213802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.