IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p609-d138285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Extended Chemical Plant Environmental Protection Game on Addressing Uncertainties of Human Adversaries

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengqiu Zhu

    (College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, China)

  • Bin Chen

    (College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, China)

  • Sihang Qiu

    (College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, China
    Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Web Information Systems, Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6, 2628 XE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Rongxiao Wang

    (College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, China)

  • Feiran Chen

    (College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, China)

  • Yiping Wang

    (The Naval 902 Factory, Shanghai 200083, China)

  • Xiaogang Qiu

    (College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, China)

Abstract

Chemical production activities in industrial districts pose great threats to the surrounding atmospheric environment and human health. Therefore, developing appropriate and intelligent pollution controlling strategies for the management team to monitor chemical production processes is significantly essential in a chemical industrial district. The literature shows that playing a chemical plant environmental protection (CPEP) game can force the chemical plants to be more compliant with environmental protection authorities and reduce the potential risks of hazardous gas dispersion accidents. However, results of the current literature strictly rely on several perfect assumptions which rarely hold in real-world domains, especially when dealing with human adversaries. To address bounded rationality and limited observability in human cognition, the CPEP game is extended to generate robust schedules of inspection resources for inspection agencies. The present paper is innovative on the following contributions: (i) The CPEP model is extended by taking observation frequency and observation cost of adversaries into account, and thus better reflects the industrial reality; (ii) Uncertainties such as attackers with bounded rationality, attackers with limited observation and incomplete information (i.e., the attacker’s parameters) are integrated into the extended CPEP model; (iii) Learning curve theory is employed to determine the attacker’s observability in the game solver. Results in the case study imply that this work improves the decision-making process for environmental protection authorities in practical fields by bringing more rewards to the inspection agencies and by acquiring more compliance from chemical plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengqiu Zhu & Bin Chen & Sihang Qiu & Rongxiao Wang & Feiran Chen & Yiping Wang & Xiaogang Qiu, 2018. "An Extended Chemical Plant Environmental Protection Game on Addressing Uncertainties of Human Adversaries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:609-:d:138285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/609/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/609/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koller, Daphne & Milch, Brian, 2003. "Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 181-221, October.
    2. Craig R. Fox & Robert T. Clemen, 2005. "Subjective Probability Assessment in Decision Analysis: Partition Dependence and Bias Toward the Ignorance Prior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(9), pages 1417-1432, September.
    3. McKelvey Richard D. & Palfrey Thomas R., 1995. "Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 6-38, July.
    4. A. M. Spence, 1981. "The Learning Curve and Competition," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(1), pages 49-70, Spring.
    5. Lones Smith & Peter Sorensen, 2000. "Pathological Outcomes of Observational Learning," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 371-398, March.
    6. Insua, Insua Rios & Rios, Jesus & Banks, David, 2009. "Adversarial Risk Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(486), pages 841-854.
    7. Bin Chen & Laobing Zhang & Gang Guo & Xiaogang Qiu, 2015. "KD-ACP: A Software Framework for Social Computing in Emergency Management," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-27, October.
    8. Dimitris Bertsimas & Omid Nohadani & Kwong Meng Teo, 2010. "Nonconvex Robust Optimization for Problems with Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 44-58, February.
    9. Zhengqiu Zhu & Bin Chen & Genserik Reniers & Laobing Zhang & Sihang Qiu & Xiaogang Qiu, 2017. "Playing Chemical Plant Environmental Protection Games with Historical Monitoring Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Tijs, S.H., 1981. "Nash equilibria for noncooperative n-person games in normal form," Other publications TiSEM 0af39700-5c65-4f49-bdc3-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Chaofeng Shao & Juan Yang & Xiaogang Tian & Meiting Ju & Lei Huang, 2013. "Integrated Environmental Risk Assessment and Whole-Process Management System in Chemical Industry Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiangyu Zhao & Kuang Cheng & Wang Zhou & Yi Cao & Shuang-Hua Yang, 2022. "Multivariate Statistical Analysis for the Detection of Air Pollution Episodes in Chemical Industry Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Bin Chen & Zhengqiu Zhu & Feiran Chen & Yong Zhao & Xiaogang Qiu, 2019. "Strategically Patrolling in a Chemical Cluster Addressing Gas Pollutants’ Releases through a Game-Theoretic Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan E. Alevy & Michael S. Haigh & John List, 2006. "Information Cascades: Evidence from An Experiment with Financial Market Professionals," NBER Working Papers 12767, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Marco Cipriani & Antonio Guarino, 2009. "Herd Behavior in Financial Markets: An Experiment with Financial Market Professionals," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(1), pages 206-233, March.
    3. Philippe Jehiel, 2022. "Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium and Related Concepts:Theory, Applications, and Beyond," PSE Working Papers halshs-03735680, HAL.
    4. Penczynski, Stefan P., 2017. "The nature of social learning: Experimental evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 148-165.
    5. Celen, Bogachan & Hyndman, Kyle, 2006. "Endogenous Network Formation In the Laboratory," MPRA Paper 1440, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. David Rios Insua & David Banks & Jesus Rios, 2016. "Modeling Opponents in Adversarial Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 742-755, April.
    7. Hommes, Cars & Zeppini, Paolo, 2014. "Innovate or Imitate? Behavioural technological change," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 308-324.
    8. Anthony Ziegelmeyer & Frédéric Koessler & Juergen Bracht & Eyal Winter, 2010. "Fragility of information cascades: an experimental study using elicited beliefs," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 13(2), pages 121-145, June.
    9. Marco Cipriani & Antonio Guarino, 2005. "Herd Behavior in a Laboratory Financial Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1427-1443, December.
    10. Ríos Insua, David & Cano, Javier & Pellot, Michael & Ortega, Ricardo, 2016. "Multithreat multisite protection: A security case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 888-899.
    11. Park, Andreas & Sgroi, Daniel, 2008. "When Herding and Contrarianism Foster Market Efficiency: A Financial Trading Experiment," Economic Research Papers 269852, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    12. Jacob K. Goeree & Thomas R. Palfrey & Brian W. Rogers & Richard D. McKelvey, 2007. "Self-Correcting Information Cascades," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(3), pages 733-762.
    13. Bin Chen & Zhengqiu Zhu & Feiran Chen & Yong Zhao & Xiaogang Qiu, 2019. "Strategically Patrolling in a Chemical Cluster Addressing Gas Pollutants’ Releases through a Game-Theoretic Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Javier Cano & David Ríos Insua & Alessandra Tedeschi & Ug̃ur Turhan, 2016. "Security economics: an adversarial risk analysis approach to airport protection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 359-378, October.
    15. Asanov, Igor, 2021. "Bandit cascade: A test of observational learning in the bandit problem," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 150-171.
    16. Ríos Insua, David & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Soyer, Refik & Rasines, Daniel G., 2018. "Adversarial issues in reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1113-1119.
    17. Michael Macgregor Perry & Hadi El-Amine, 2021. "Computational Efficiency in Multivariate Adversarial Risk Analysis Models," Papers 2110.12572, arXiv.org.
    18. Dogucan Mazicioglu & Jason R. W. Merrick, 2018. "Behavioral Modeling of Adversaries with Multiple Objectives in Counterterrorism," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 962-977, May.
    19. Michael Perry & Hadi El-Amine, 2019. "Computational Efficiency in Multivariate Adversarial Risk Analysis Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 314-332, December.
    20. Salo, Ahti & Andelmin, Juho & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2022. "Decision programming for mixed-integer multi-stage optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 550-565.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:609-:d:138285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.