IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v12y2021i4p84-d667869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Norm and Risk Attitudes: Introduction to the Special Issue

Author

Listed:
  • Heinrich H. Nax

    (Department of Sociology, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland
    Department of Humanities, Social and Pol.Sc., ETH Zurich, Clausiusstrasse 37, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Individuals’ attitudes to both risks and social norms crucially determine what players in a social interaction will decide to do [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Heinrich H. Nax, 2021. "Social Norm and Risk Attitudes: Introduction to the Special Issue," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-2, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:84-:d:667869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/4/84/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/4/84/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip D. Grech, 2019. "Give and Let Give: Alternative Mechanisms Based on Voluntary Contributions," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Jan Schmitz, 2019. "When Two Become One: How Group Mergers Affect Solidarity," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-42, July.
    3. Kurt A. Ackermann & Ryan O. Murphy, 2019. "Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes & Dieko M. Bakker & Jacob Dijkstra, 2022. "Assessing the test-retest reliability of the social value orientation slider measure," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 17(1), pages 31-49, January.
    2. Masiliūnas, Aidas & Nax, Heinrich H., 2020. "Framing and repeated competition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 604-619.
    3. Casoria, Fortuna & Ciccone, Alice, 2021. "Do upfront investments increase cooperation? A laboratory experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Léon Bartosch & Dorothee Mischkowski, 2023. "The Importance of Reciprocity: Investigating Individual Differences Underlying Conditional Cooperation," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2023_01, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    5. Frans van Winden, 2021. "The Informational Affective Tie Mechanism: On the Role of Uncertainty, Context, and Attention in Caring," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-012/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:31-49 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Grech, Philip D. & Nax, Heinrich H., 2020. "Rational altruism? On preference estimation and dictator game experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 309-338.
    8. Bilancini, Ennio & Boncinelli, Leonardo & Celadin, Tatiana, 2022. "Social value orientation and conditional cooperation in the online one-shot public goods game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 243-272.
    9. Jürgen Fleiß & Kurt A. Ackermann & Eva Fleiß & Ryan O. Murphy & Alfred Posch, 2020. "Social and environmental preferences: measuring how people make tradeoffs among themselves, others, and collective goods," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(3), pages 1049-1067, September.
    10. van Winden, Frans, 2023. "The informational affective tie mechanism: on the role of uncertainty, context, and attention in caring," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Ju, Ying & Kocher, Martin G., 2020. "Leading by example in a public goods experimentwith benefit heterogeneity," IHS Working Paper Series 25, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    12. Jing Yu & Martin G. Kocher, 2023. "Leading by example in a public goods experiment with benefit heterogeneity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 685-712, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    n/a;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:84-:d:667869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.