IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v1y2021i1p1-24d685771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Uncertainty-Goal Programming Model with Scaled Index for Production Planning Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Junzo Watada

    (Information, Production and Systems Research Center, Waseda University, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu 8080135, Japan
    Current address: ISME, 2-10-8-407 Kobai, Yahatanishi, Kitakyushu 8060011, Japan.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nureize Binti Arbaiy

    (Department of Software Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Malaysia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Qiuhong Chen

    (International Society of Management Engineers, Kitakyushu 8060011, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Goal programming (GP) can be thought of as an extension or generalization of linear programming to handle multiple, normally conflicting objective measures. Each of these measures is given a goal or target value to be achieved. Unwanted deviations from this set of target values are then minimized in an achievement function. Production planning is an important process that aims to leverage the resources available in industry to achieve one or more business goals. However, the production planning that typically uses mathematical models has its own challenges where parameter models are sometimes difficult to find easily and accurately. Data collected with various data collection methods and human experts’ judgments are often prone to uncertainties that can affect the information presented by quantitative results. This study focuses on resolving data uncertainties as well as multi-objective optimization using fuzzy random methods and GP in production planning problems. GP was enhanced with fuzzy random features. Scalable approaches and maximum minimum operators were then used to solve multi-object optimization problems. Scaled indices were also introduced to resolve fuzzy symbols containing unspecified relationships. The application results indicate that the proposed approach can mitigate the characteristics of uncertainty in the analysis and achieve a satisfactory optimized solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Junzo Watada & Nureize Binti Arbaiy & Qiuhong Chen, 2021. "Hybrid Uncertainty-Goal Programming Model with Scaled Index for Production Planning Assessment," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:1-24:d:685771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/1/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/1/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper & R. O. Ferguson, 1955. "Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 138-151, January.
    2. Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz, 2010. "Practical Goal Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 1, number 978-1-4419-5771-9, September.
    3. Tarik Aouam & Kobe Geryl & Kunal Kumar & Nadjib Brahimi, 2018. "Production planning with order acceptance and demand uncertainty," Post-Print hal-01998733, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mila Bravo & Dylan Jones & David Pla-Santamaria & Francisco Salas-Molina, 2022. "Encompassing statistically unquantifiable randomness in goal programming: an application to portfolio selection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5685-5706, November.
    2. Stamenkovska, Ivana Janeska & Dimitrievski, Dragi & Erjavec, Emil & Stojcheska, Aleksandra Martinovska & Zgajnar, Jaka, 2014. "A weighted goal programming model for vegetable production planning in Republic of Macedonia," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182967, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Hashem Omrani & Mahsa Valipour & Ali Emrouznejad, 2019. "Using Weighted Goal Programming Model for Planning Regional Sustainable Development to Optimal Workforce Allocation: An Application for Provinces of Iran," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1007-1035, February.
    4. Benítez-Fernández, Amalia & Ruiz, Francisco, 2020. "A Meta-Goal Programming approach to cardinal preferences aggregation in multicriteria problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2011. "Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 439-445, December.
    6. Danilo Liuzzi & Veronica Lupi & Aymeric Vié, 2022. "Sustainability, cooperation and mobility of workers within and between European countries: a two-stage goal programming model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 749-769, April.
    7. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica, 2016. "A model based on Copula Theory for sustainable and social responsible investments," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 55-76.
    8. Jayaraman, Raja & Colapinto, Cinzia & Torre, Davide La & Malik, Tufail, 2015. "Multi-criteria model for sustainable development using goal programming applied to the United Arab Emirates," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 447-454.
    9. David Kik & Matthias Gerhard Wichmann & Thomas Stefan Spengler, 2022. "Decision support framework for the regional facility location and development planning problem," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 115-157, January.
    10. Tom Rihm & Philipp Baumann, 2018. "Staff assignment with lexicographically ordered acceptance levels," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 167-189, April.
    11. Umar Muhammad Modibbo & Irfan Ali & Aquil Ahmed, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization modelling for analysing sustainable development goals of Nigeria: Agenda 2030," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9529-9563, June.
    12. Cinzia Colapinto & Raja Jayaraman & Simone Marsiglio, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 7-40, April.
    13. Kay Giesecke & Baeho Kim & Jack Kim & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2014. "Optimal Credit Swap Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2291-2307, September.
    14. Broz, Diego & Vanzetti, Nicolás & Corsano, Gabriela & Montagna, Jorge M., 2019. "Goal programming application for the decision support in the daily production planning of sawmills," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 29-40.
    15. Babooshka Shavazipour & Theodor J. Stewart, 2021. "Multi-objective optimisation under deep uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2459-2487, December.
    16. Andreas Kleine & Andreas Dellnitz, 2017. "Allocation of seminar applicants," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(7), pages 927-941, October.
    17. Raja Jayaraman & Danilo Liuzzi & Cinzia Colapinto & Tufail Malik, 2017. "A fuzzy goal programming model to analyze energy, environmental and sustainability goals of the United Arab Emirates," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 255-270, April.
    18. Raja Jayaraman & Cinzia Colapinto & Danilo Liuzzi & Davide Torre, 2017. "Planning sustainable development through a scenario-based stochastic goal programming model," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 789-805, October.
    19. Francisco Guijarro, 2019. "A Multicriteria Model for the Assessment of Countries’ Environmental Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Francisco Salas-Molina & Filippo Bistaffa & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2024. "A General Approach for Computing a Consensus in Group Decision Making That Integrates Multiple Ethical Principles," Papers 2401.07818, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:1-24:d:685771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.