IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i11p12331-12668d58413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Md M. Khan

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211–116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Joseph P. Mmbaga

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211–116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Ahad S. Shirazi

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211–116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Japan Trivedi

    (School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1H9, AB, Canada)

  • Qingzia Liu

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211–116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Rajender Gupta

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211–116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

Abstract

The technical feasibility of underground coal gasification (UCG) has been established through many field trials and laboratory-scale experiments over the past decades. However, the UCG is site specific and the commercialization of UCG is being hindered due to the lack of complete information for a specific site of operation. Since conducting UCG trials and data extraction are costly and difficult, modeling has been an important part of UCG study to predict the effect of various physical and operating parameters on the performance of the process. Over the years, various models have been developed in order to improve the understanding of the UCG process. This article reviews the approaches, key concepts, assumptions, and limitations of various forward gasification UCG models for cavity growth and product gas recovery. However, emphasis is given to the most important models, such as packed bed models, the channel model, and the coal slab model. In addition, because of the integral part of the main models, various sub-models such as drying and pyrolysis are also included in this review. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the various simulation methodologies and sub-models in order to enhance the understanding of the critical aspects of the UCG process.

Suggested Citation

  • Md M. Khan & Joseph P. Mmbaga & Ahad S. Shirazi & Japan Trivedi & Qingzia Liu & Rajender Gupta, 2015. "Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-66, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:11:p:12331-12668:d:58413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Y. Klimenko, 2009. "Early Ideas in Underground Coal Gasification and Their Evolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Faqiang Su & Takuya Nakanowataru & Ken-ichi Itakura & Koutarou Ohga & Gota Deguchi, 2013. "Evaluation of Structural Changes in the Coal Specimen Heating Process and UCG Model Experiments for Developing Efficient UCG Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Daggupati, Sateesh & Mandapati, Ramesh N. & Mahajani, Sanjay M. & Ganesh, Anuradda & Mathur, D.K. & Sharma, R.K. & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2010. "Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2374-2386.
    4. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2011. "Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5854-5864.
    5. Blinderman, M.S. & Saulov, D.N. & Klimenko, A.Y., 2008. "Forward and reverse combustion linking in underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 446-454.
    6. Cui, Yong & Liang, Jie & Wang, Zhangqing & Zhang, Xiaochun & Fan, Chenzi & Liang, Dongyu & Wang, Xuan, 2014. "Forward and reverse combustion gasification of coal with production of high-quality syngas in a simulated pilot system for in situ gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 9-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Chen & Yong Qin & Yanpeng Chen & Zhen Dong & Junjie Xue & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Yufeng Zhao, 2023. "Quantitative Evaluation of Underground Coal Gasification Based on a CO 2 Gasification Agent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Zenon Pilecki & Robert Hildebrandt & Krzysztof Krawiec & Elżbieta Pilecka & Zbigniew Lubosik & Tomasz Łątka, 2023. "Assessment of Combustion Cavern Geometry in Underground Coal Gasification Process with the Use of Borehole Ground-Penetrating Radar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Fa-qiang Su & Akihiro Hamanaka & Ken-ichi Itakura & Gota Deguchi & Wenyan Zhang & Hua Nan, 2018. "Evaluation of a Compact Coaxial Underground Coal Gasification System Inside an Artificial Coal Seam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Ján Kačur & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "The Underground Coal Gasification Process in Laboratory Conditions: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner & Rebecca Frančáková, 2023. "A Review of Research on Advanced Control Methods for Underground Coal Gasification Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    6. Su, Fa-qiang & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Zhang, Wenyan & Deguchi, Gota & Sato, Kohki & Takahashi, Kazuhiro & Kodama, Jun-ichi, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation of simulated underground coal gasification in an ex-situ experimental artificial coal seam system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 82-92.
    7. Jacek Nowak & Magdalena Kokowska-Pawłowska & Joanna Komorek & Marian Wiatowski & Krzysztof Kapusta & Zdzisław Adamczyk, 2022. "Optical Properties of Coal after Ex-Situ Experimental Simulation of Underground Gasification at Pressures of 10 and 40 bar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Milan Durdán & Marta Benková & Marek Laciak & Ján Kačur & Patrik Flegner, 2021. "Regression Models Utilization to the Underground Temperature Determination at Coal Energy Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "Prediction of Steam Jacket Dynamics and Water Balances in Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Tomasz Janoszek & Wojciech Masny, 2021. "CFD Simulations of Allothermal Steam Gasification Process for Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2020. "Synthesis Gas Composition Prediction for Underground Coal Gasification Using a Thermochemical Equilibrium Modeling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Zhen Dong & Haiyang Yi & Yufeng Zhao & Xinggang Wang & Tingxiang Chu & Junjie Xue & Hanqi Wu & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Hao Chen, 2022. "Investigation of the Evolution of Stratum Fracture during the Cavity Expansion of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Zhizhen Zhang & Xiao Yang & Xiaoji Shang & Huai Yang, 2022. "A Thermal-Hydrological-Mechanical-Chemical Coupled Mathematical Model for Underground Coal Gasification with Random Fractures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Krzysztof Skrzypkowski & Krzysztof Zagórski & Anna Zagórska, 2021. "Determination of the Extent of the Rock Destruction Zones around a Gasification Channel on the Basis of Strength Tests of Sandstone and Claystone Samples Heated at High Temperatures up to 1200 °C and ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Mohammadreza Shahbazi & Mehdi Najafi & Mohammad Fatehi Marji, 2019. "On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 373-398, March.
    17. Jowkar, Amin & Sereshki, Farhang & Najafi, Mehdi, 2018. "A new model for evaluation of cavity shape and volume during Underground Coal Gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 756-765.
    18. Xi Lin & Qingya Liu & Zhenyu Liu, 2018. "Estimation of Effective Diffusion Coefficient of O 2 in Ash Layer in Underground Coal Gasification by Thermogravimetric Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Marco Torresi & Francesco Fornarelli & Bernardo Fortunato & Sergio Mario Camporeale & Alessandro Saponaro, 2017. "Assessment against Experiments of Devolatilization and Char Burnout Models for the Simulation of an Aerodynamically Staged Swirled Low-NO x Pulverized Coal Burner," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Stefan Zelenak & Erika Skvarekova & Andrea Senova & Gabriel Wittenberger, 2021. "The Usage of UCG Technology as Alternative to Reach Low-Carbon Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    4. Xi Lin & Qingya Liu & Zhenyu Liu, 2018. "Estimation of Effective Diffusion Coefficient of O 2 in Ash Layer in Underground Coal Gasification by Thermogravimetric Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Javed, Syed Bilal & Uppal, Ali Arshad & Bhatti, Aamer Iqbal & Samar, Raza, 2019. "Prediction and parametric analysis of cavity growth for the underground coal gasification project Thar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1277-1290.
    6. Su, Fa-qiang & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Deguchi, Gota & Ohga, Koutarou, 2017. "Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 142-156.
    7. Yufeng Zhao & Zhen Dong & Yanpeng Chen & Hao Chen & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Junjie Xue & Xinggang Wang & Lixin Jiao, 2023. "Physical Simulation Test of Underground Coal Gasification Cavity Evolution in the Horizontal Segment of U-Shaped Well," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Saulov, Dmitry N. & Plumb, Ovid A. & Klimenko, A.Y., 2010. "Flame propagation in a gasification channel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1264-1273.
    9. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    10. Prabu, V., 2015. "Integration of in-situ CO2-oxy coal gasification with advanced power generating systems performing in a chemical looping approach of clean combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Su, Fa-qiang & Wu, Jun-bo & Tao-Zhang, & Deng, Qi-chao & Yu, Yi-he & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Dai, Meng-Jia & Yang, Jun-Nan & He, Xiao-long, 2023. "Study on the monitoring method of cavity growth in underground coal gasification under laboratory conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    12. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Hongtao Liu & Feng Chen & Yuanyuan Wang & Gang Liu & Hong Yao & Shuqin Liu, 2018. "Experimental Study of Reverse Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Fa-qiang Su & Akihiro Hamanaka & Ken-ichi Itakura & Gota Deguchi & Wenyan Zhang & Hua Nan, 2018. "Evaluation of a Compact Coaxial Underground Coal Gasification System Inside an Artificial Coal Seam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, April.
    15. Jowkar, Amin & Sereshki, Farhang & Najafi, Mehdi, 2018. "A new model for evaluation of cavity shape and volume during Underground Coal Gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 756-765.
    16. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Underground coal-air gasification based solid oxide fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 406-414.
    17. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Laboratory scale studies on simulated underground coal gasification of high ash coals for carbon-neutral power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 351-358.
    18. Huijun Fang & Yuewu Liu & Tengze Ge & Taiyi Zheng & Yueyu Yu & Danlu Liu & Jiuge Ding & Longlong Li, 2022. "A Review of Research on Cavity Growth in the Context of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Cui, Yong & Liang, Jie & Wang, Zhangqing & Zhang, Xiaochun & Fan, Chenzi & Liang, Dongyu & Wang, Xuan, 2014. "Forward and reverse combustion gasification of coal with production of high-quality syngas in a simulated pilot system for in situ gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 9-19.
    20. Su, Fa-qiang & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Zhang, Wenyan & Deguchi, Gota & Sato, Kohki & Takahashi, Kazuhiro & Kodama, Jun-ichi, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation of simulated underground coal gasification in an ex-situ experimental artificial coal seam system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 82-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:11:p:12331-12668:d:58413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.