IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i4p898-d140591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a Compact Coaxial Underground Coal Gasification System Inside an Artificial Coal Seam

Author

Listed:
  • Fa-qiang Su

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, 2001 Century Avenue, Jiaozuo 454-003, China)

  • Akihiro Hamanaka

    (Department of Earth Resources Engineering, Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan)

  • Ken-ichi Itakura

    (Graduate School of Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, 27-1 Mizumoto, Muroran 050-8585, Japan)

  • Gota Deguchi

    (Underground Resources Innovation Network, Non-Profit Organization (NPO), Higashi-ku, Sapporo 007-0847, Japan)

  • Wenyan Zhang

    (School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, 2001 Century Avenue, Jiaozuo 454-003, Henan, China)

  • Hua Nan

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, 2001 Century Avenue, Jiaozuo 454-003, China)

Abstract

The Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) system is a clean technology for obtaining energy from coal. The coaxial UCG system is supposed to be compact and flexible in order to adapt to complicated geological conditions caused by the existence of faults and folds in the ground. In this study, the application of a coaxial UCG system with a horizontal well is discussed, by means of an ex situ model UCG experiment in a large-scale simulated coal seam with dimensions of 550 × 600 × 2740 mm. A horizontal well with a 45-mm diameter and a 2600-mm length was used as an injection/production well. During the experiment, changes in temperature field and product gas compositions were observed when changing the outlet position of the injection pipe. It was found that the UCG reactor is unstable and expands continuously due to fracturing activity caused by coal crack initiation and extension under the influence of thermal stress. Therefore, acoustic emission (AE) is considered an effective tool to monitor fracturing activities and visualize the gasification zone of coal. The results gathered from monitoring of AEs agree with the measured data of temperatures; the source location of AE was detected around the region where temperature increased. The average calorific value of the produced gas was 6.85 MJ/Nm 3 , and the gasification efficiency, defined as the conversion efficiency of the gasified coal to syngas, was 65.43%, in the whole experimental process. The study results suggest that the recovered coal energy from a coaxial UCG system is comparable to that of a conventional UCG system. Therefore, a coaxial UCG system may be a feasible option to utilize abandoned underground coal resources without mining.

Suggested Citation

  • Fa-qiang Su & Akihiro Hamanaka & Ken-ichi Itakura & Gota Deguchi & Wenyan Zhang & Hua Nan, 2018. "Evaluation of a Compact Coaxial Underground Coal Gasification System Inside an Artificial Coal Seam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:898-:d:140591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/898/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/898/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi Lin & Qingya Liu & Zhenyu Liu, 2018. "Estimation of Effective Diffusion Coefficient of O 2 in Ash Layer in Underground Coal Gasification by Thermogravimetric Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Faqiang Su & Takuya Nakanowataru & Ken-ichi Itakura & Koutarou Ohga & Gota Deguchi, 2013. "Evaluation of Structural Changes in the Coal Specimen Heating Process and UCG Model Experiments for Developing Efficient UCG Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "Prediction of Steam Jacket Dynamics and Water Balances in Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Imran, Muhammad & Kumar, Dileep & Kumar, Naresh & Qayyum, Abdul & Saeed, Ahmed & Bhatti, Muhammad Shamim, 2014. "Environmental concerns of underground coal gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 600-610.
    5. Su, Fa-qiang & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Deguchi, Gota & Ohga, Koutarou, 2017. "Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 142-156.
    6. Khadse, Anil & Qayyumi, Mohammed & Mahajani, Sanjay & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2007. "Underground coal gasification: A new clean coal utilization technique for India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2061-2071.
    7. Akihiro Hamanaka & Fa-qiang Su & Ken-ichi Itakura & Kazuhiro Takahashi & Jun-ichi Kodama & Gota Deguchi, 2017. "Effect of Injection Flow Rate on Product Gas Quality in Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Based on Laboratory Scale Experiment: Development of Co-Axial UCG System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    9. Natalie Christine Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Md M. Khan & Joseph P. Mmbaga & Ahad S. Shirazi & Japan Trivedi & Qingzia Liu & Rajender Gupta, 2015. "Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-66, November.
    12. Cui, Yong & Liang, Jie & Wang, Zhangqing & Zhang, Xiaochun & Fan, Chenzi & Liang, Dongyu & Wang, Xuan, 2014. "Forward and reverse combustion gasification of coal with production of high-quality syngas in a simulated pilot system for in situ gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 9-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    2. Feng, Lele & Zhou, Sibo & Xu, Xiangcen & Qin, Botao, 2022. "Importance evaluation for influencing factors of underground coal gasification through ex-situ experiment and analytic hierarchy process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Xi Lin & Qingya Liu & Zhenyu Liu, 2018. "Estimation of Effective Diffusion Coefficient of O 2 in Ash Layer in Underground Coal Gasification by Thermogravimetric Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "Prediction of Steam Jacket Dynamics and Water Balances in Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Karol Kostúr & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdan, 2018. "Some Influences of Underground Coal Gasification on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.
    5. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Oleg Bazaluk & Vasyl Lozynskyi & Volodymyr Falshtynskyi & Pavlo Saik & Roman Dychkovskyi & Edgar Cabana, 2021. "Experimental Studies of the Effect of Design and Technological Solutions on the Intensification of an Underground Coal Gasification Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Zenon Pilecki & Robert Hildebrandt & Krzysztof Krawiec & Elżbieta Pilecka & Zbigniew Lubosik & Tomasz Łątka, 2023. "Assessment of Combustion Cavern Geometry in Underground Coal Gasification Process with the Use of Borehole Ground-Penetrating Radar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Su, Fa-qiang & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Zhang, Wenyan & Deguchi, Gota & Sato, Kohki & Takahashi, Kazuhiro & Kodama, Jun-ichi, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation of simulated underground coal gasification in an ex-situ experimental artificial coal seam system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 82-92.
    9. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    10. Stefan Zelenak & Erika Skvarekova & Andrea Senova & Gabriel Wittenberger, 2021. "The Usage of UCG Technology as Alternative to Reach Low-Carbon Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    12. Mohammadreza Shahbazi & Mehdi Najafi & Mohammad Fatehi Marji, 2019. "On the mitigating environmental aspects of a vertical well in underground coal gasification method," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 373-398, March.
    13. Krzysztof Skrzypkowski & Krzysztof Zagórski & Anna Zagórska, 2021. "Determination of the Extent of the Rock Destruction Zones around a Gasification Channel on the Basis of Strength Tests of Sandstone and Claystone Samples Heated at High Temperatures up to 1200 °C and ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    14. Akihiro Hamanaka & Fa-qiang Su & Ken-ichi Itakura & Kazuhiro Takahashi & Jun-ichi Kodama & Gota Deguchi, 2017. "Effect of Injection Flow Rate on Product Gas Quality in Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Based on Laboratory Scale Experiment: Development of Co-Axial UCG System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, February.
    15. Verma, Aman & Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Greenhouse gas abatement costs of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 556-568.
    16. Zhen Dong & Haiyang Yi & Yufeng Zhao & Xinggang Wang & Tingxiang Chu & Junjie Xue & Hanqi Wu & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Hao Chen, 2022. "Investigation of the Evolution of Stratum Fracture during the Cavity Expansion of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Li, Xin & Tian, Jijun & Ju, Yiwen & Chen, Yanpeng, 2022. "Permeability variations of lignite and bituminous coals under elevated pyrolysis temperatures (35–600 °C): An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    18. Javed, Syed Bilal & Uppal, Ali Arshad & Samar, Raza & Bhatti, Aamer Iqbal, 2021. "Design and implementation of multi-variable H∞ robust control for the underground coal gasification project Thar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Javed, Syed Bilal & Uppal, Ali Arshad & Bhatti, Aamer Iqbal & Samar, Raza, 2019. "Prediction and parametric analysis of cavity growth for the underground coal gasification project Thar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1277-1290.
    20. Md M. Khan & Joseph P. Mmbaga & Ahad S. Shirazi & Japan Trivedi & Qingzia Liu & Rajender Gupta, 2015. "Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-66, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:898-:d:140591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.