IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v6y2013i5p2644-2662d25899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle GHG of NG-Based Fuel and Electric Vehicle in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xunmin Ou

    (Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy (3E), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    China Automotive Energy Research Center (CAERC), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xiliang Zhang

    (Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy (3E), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    China Automotive Energy Research Center (CAERC), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xu Zhang

    (Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy (3E), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    China Automotive Energy Research Center (CAERC), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Qian Zhang

    (Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy (3E), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    China Automotive Energy Research Center (CAERC), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

This paper compares the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of natural gas (NG)- based fuels to the GHG emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) powered with NG-to-electricity in China. A life-cycle model is used to account for full fuel cycle and use-phase emissions, as well as vehicle cycle and battery manufacturing. The reduction of life-cycle GHG emissions of EVs charged by electricity generated from NG, without utilizing carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) technology can be 36%–47% when compared to gasoline vehicles. The large range change in emissions reduction potential is driven by the different generation technologies that could in the future be used to generate electricity in China. When CCS is employed in power plants, the GHG emission reductions increase to about 71%–73% compared to gasoline vehicles. It is found that compressed NG (CNG) and liquefied NG (LNG) fuels can save about 10% of carbon as compared to gasoline vehicles. However, gas-to-liquid (GTL) fuel made through the Fischer-Tropsch method will likely lead to a life-cycle GHG emissions increase, potentially 3%–15% higher than gasoline, but roughly equal to petroleum-based diesel. When CCS is utilized, the GTL fueled vehicles emit roughly equal GHG emissions to petroleum-based diesel fuel high-efficient hybrid electric vehicle from the life-cycle perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Xunmin Ou & Xiliang Zhang & Xu Zhang & Qian Zhang, 2013. "Life Cycle GHG of NG-Based Fuel and Electric Vehicle in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:5:p:2644-2662:d:25899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/5/2644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/5/2644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Wenying & Xu, Ruina, 2010. "Clean coal technology development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2123-2130, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    2. Jianyun Zhang & Xinxin Li & Lingying Pan, 2022. "Policy Effect on Clean Coal-Fired Power Development in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Xiang, Yue & Guo, Yongtao & Wu, Gang & Liu, Junyong & Sun, Wei & Lei, Yutian & Zeng, Pingliang, 2022. "Low-carbon economic planning of integrated electricity-gas energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Xiaowei Song & Yongpei Hao, 2019. "Vehicular Emission Inventory and Reduction Scenario Analysis in the Yangtze River Delta, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Xiaowei Song & Yongpei Hao & Xiaodong Zhu, 2019. "Air Pollutant Emissions from Vehicles and Their Abatement Scenarios: A Case Study of Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Deng, Liangwei & Yang, Hongnan & Liu, Gangjin & Zheng, Dan & Chen, Ziai & Liu, Yi & Pu, Xiaodong & Song, Li & Wang, Zhiyong & Lei, Yunhui, 2014. "Kinetics of temperature effects and its significance to the heating strategy for anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 349-355.
    7. Li, X. & Hubacek, K. & Siu, Y.L., 2012. "Wind power in China – Dream or reality?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 51-60.
    8. Enci Wang & Jianyun Nie & Hong Zhan, 2022. "The Impact of Carbon Emissions Trading on the Profitability and Debt Burden of Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Liu, Gengyuan & Hao, Yan & Zhou, Yun & Yang, Zhifeng & Zhang, Yan & Su, Meirong, 2016. "China's low-carbon industrial transformation assessment based on Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 156-170.
    10. Hoffmann, Bettina Susanne & Szklo, Alexandre, 2011. "Integrated gasification combined cycle and carbon capture: A risky option to mitigate CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3917-3929.
    11. Zhang, Bin & Lu, Danting & He, Yan & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2018. "The efficiencies of resource-saving and environment: A case study based on Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 493-507.
    12. Liu, Feng & Lyu, Tao & Pan, Li & Wang, Fei, 2017. "Influencing factors of public support for modern coal-fired power plant projects: An empirical study from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 398-406.
    13. Laëtitia Guilhot, 2022. "An analysis of China's energy policy from 1981 to 2020: Transitioning towards to a diversified and low-carbon energy system," Post-Print halshs-03548757, HAL.
    14. Höller, Samuel & Viebahn, Peter, 2016. "Facing the uncertainty of CO2 storage capacity in China by developing different storage scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 64-73.
    15. Jun-You Lin & Chih-Hai Yang, 2020. "Heterogeneity in industry–university R&D collaboration and firm innovative performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Lv, Chengwei & Xu, Jiuping & Xie, Heping & Zeng, Ziqiang & Wu, Yimin, 2016. "Equilibrium strategy based coal blending method for combined carbon and PM10 emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1035-1052.
    17. Xu Tang & Benjamin C. McLellan & Simon Snowden & Baosheng Zhang & Mikael Höök, 2015. "Dilemmas for China: Energy, Economy and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Jim Watson & Rob Byrne & David Ockwell & Michele Stua, 2015. "Lessons from China: building technological capabilities for low carbon technology transfer and development," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 387-399, August.
    19. Schreifels, Jeremy J. & Fu, Yale & Wilson, Elizabeth J., 2012. "Sulfur dioxide control in China: policy evolution during the 10th and 11th Five-year Plans and lessons for the future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 779-789.
    20. Xiangyu Teng & Fan‐peng Liu & Yung‐ho Chiu, 2020. "The impact of coal and non‐coal consumption on China's energy performance improvement," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 334-352, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:5:p:2644-2662:d:25899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.