IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1738-d1624724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Response of a 15 MW Jacket-Supported Offshore Wind Turbine Excited by Different Loadings

Author

Listed:
  • Renqiang Xi

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Lijie Yu

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Xiaowei Meng

    (Xinjiang Goldwind Science Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China)

  • Wanli Yu

    (National Key Laboratory of Bridge Safety and Resilience, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic behavior of a jacket-supported offshore wind turbine (JOWT) by developing its substructure and controller tailored for the IEA 15 MW reference wind turbine. A fully coupled numerical model integrating the turbine, jacket, and pile is established to analyze the natural frequencies and dynamic responses of the system under wind–wave–current loading and seismic excitations. Validation studies confirm that the proposed 15 MW JOWT configuration complies with international standards regarding natural frequency constraints, bearing capacity requirements, and serviceability limit state criteria. Notably, the fixed-base assumption leads to overestimations of natural frequencies by 32.4% and 13.9% in the fore-aft third- and fourth-order modes, respectively, highlighting the necessity of soil–structure interaction (SSI) modeling. During both operational and extreme wind–wave conditions, structural responses are governed by first-mode vibrations, with the pile-head axial forces constituting the primary resistance against jacket overturning moments. In contrast, seismic excitations conversely trigger significantly higher-mode activation in the support structure, where SSI effects substantially influence response magnitudes. Comparative analysis demonstrates that neglecting SSI underestimates peak seismic responses under the BCR (Bonds Corner Record of 1979 Imperial Valley Earthquake) ground motion by 29% (nacelle acceleration), 21% (yaw-bearing bending moment), 42% (yaw-bearing shear force), and 17% (tower-base bending moment).

Suggested Citation

  • Renqiang Xi & Lijie Yu & Xiaowei Meng & Wanli Yu, 2025. "Dynamic Response of a 15 MW Jacket-Supported Offshore Wind Turbine Excited by Different Loadings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1738-:d:1624724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ju, Shen-Haw & Su, Feng-Chien & Ke, Yi-Pei & Xie, Min-Hsuan, 2019. "Fatigue design of offshore wind turbine jacket-type structures using a parallel scheme," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 69-78.
    2. Wei, K. & Arwade, S.R. & Myers, A.T. & Hallowell, S. & Hajjar, J.F. & Hines, E.M. & Pang, W., 2016. "Toward performance-based evaluation for offshore wind turbine jacket support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 709-721.
    3. Abhinav, K.A. & Saha, Nilanjan, 2017. "Stochastic response of jacket supported offshore wind turbines for varying soil parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 550-564.
    4. Chen, Wen-Li & Zhang, Ziyang & Liu, Jiabin & Gao, Donglai, 2025. "Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of a jacket-type offshore wind turbine under coupling action of wind and wave," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    5. Shi, Wei & Park, Hyunchul & Han, Jonghoon & Na, Sangkwon & Kim, Changwan, 2013. "A study on the effect of different modeling parameters on the dynamic response of a jacket-type offshore wind turbine in the Korean Southwest Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 50-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karimirad, Madjid & Michailides, Constantine, 2015. "V-shaped semisubmersible offshore wind turbine: An alternative concept for offshore wind technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 126-143.
    2. Li Zhou & Shifeng Ding & Ming Song & Junliang Gao & Wei Shi, 2019. "A Simulation of Non-Simultaneous Ice Crushing Force for Wind Turbine Towers with Large Slopes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Shi, Wei & Han, Jonghoon & Kim, Changwan & Lee, Daeyong & Shin, Hyunkyoung & Park, Hyunchul, 2015. "Feasibility study of offshore wind turbine substructures for southwest offshore wind farm project in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 406-413.
    4. He, Kunpeng & Ye, Jianhong, 2023. "Seismic dynamics of offshore wind turbine-seabed foundation: Insights from a numerical study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 200-221.
    5. Chenggen Xu & Haitao Jiang & Mengtao Xu & Decheng Sun & Shengjie Rui, 2022. "Calculation Method for Uplift Capacity of Suction Caisson in Sand Considering Different Drainage Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Lee, Yeon-Seung & Choi, Byung-Lyul & Lee, Ji Hyun & Kim, Soo Young & Han, Soonhung, 2014. "Reliability-based design optimization of monopile transition piece for offshore wind turbine system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 729-741.
    7. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Zhiyu Jiang & Weifei Hu & Wenbin Dong & Zhen Gao & Zhengru Ren, 2017. "Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Ju, Shen-Haw, 2022. "Increasing the fatigue life of offshore wind turbine jacket structures using yaw stiffness and damping," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. Charlton, T.S. & Rouainia, M., 2022. "Geotechnical fragility analysis of monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines in extreme storms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1126-1140.
    11. Li, Jiale & Wang, Xuefei & Guo, Yuan & Yu, Xiong Bill, 2020. "The loading behavior of innovative monopile foundations for offshore wind turbine based on centrifuge experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1109-1120.
    12. Hashemi, M.Reza & Kresning, Boma & Hashemi, Javad & Ginis, Isaac, 2021. "Assessment of hurricane generated loads on offshore wind farms; a closer look at most extreme historical hurricanes in New England," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 593-609.
    13. Lee, Yeon-Seung & González, José A. & Lee, Ji Hyun & Kim, Young Il & Park, K.C. & Han, Soonhung, 2016. "Structural topology optimization of the transition piece for an offshore wind turbine with jacket foundation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1214-1225.
    14. Renjie Mo & Haigui Kang & Miao Li & Xuanlie Zhao, 2017. "Seismic Fragility Analysis of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines under Different Operational Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Zhanpu Xue & Hao Zhang & Yunguang Ji, 2023. "Dynamic Response of a Flexible Multi-Body in Large Wind Turbines: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    16. Willis, D.J. & Niezrecki, C. & Kuchma, D. & Hines, E. & Arwade, S.R. & Barthelmie, R.J. & DiPaola, M. & Drane, P.J. & Hansen, C.J. & Inalpolat, M. & Mack, J.H. & Myers, A.T. & Rotea, M., 2018. "Wind energy research: State-of-the-art and future research directions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 133-154.
    17. Thanh-Tuan Tran & Sangkyun Kang & Jang-Ho Lee & Daeyong Lee, 2021. "Directional Bending Performance of 4-Leg Jacket Substructure Supporting a 3MW Offshore Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Abhinav, K.A. & Saha, Nilanjan, 2017. "Stochastic response of jacket supported offshore wind turbines for varying soil parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 550-564.
    19. Wilkie, David & Galasso, Carmine, 2020. "A probabilistic framework for offshore wind turbine loss assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1772-1783.
    20. Bernier, Carl & Padgett, Jamie E., 2019. "Fragility and risk assessment of aboveground storage tanks subjected to concurrent surge, wave, and wind loads," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1738-:d:1624724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.