IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1645-d1620111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-Level Optimal Scheduling of Electric–Aluminum–Carbon Energy System Considering Operational Safety of Electrolytic Aluminum Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Yulong Yang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China)

  • Songyuan Li

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China)

  • Nan Zhang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China)

  • Zhongwen Yan

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China)

  • Weiyang Liu

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China)

  • Songnan Wang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the mounting pressure on the integration of renewable power has emerged as a crucial concern within renewable power systems. This situation urgently necessitates an enhancement in the operational flexibility of the demand side. As an energy-intensive load, electrolytic aluminum plants have great potential to participate in the demand response. However, existing models for electrolytic aluminum load regulation lack verification of operational safety, and there is a lack of consideration of carbon trading mechanisms. To this end, this paper proposes a two-level optimization framework for electric–aluminum–carbon energy systems. More specifically, this work presents a safety-constrained electrolytic aluminum plant model, which considers operational states swinging with key parameters and limitations verified by the thermal dynamic simulations of electrolytic aluminum electrolyzers. In addition, green certificate and tiered carbon trading mechanisms are both introduced to the electric–aluminum–carbon energy. Case studies show that the proposed framework can significantly reduce the system emission by 21.9%, improve the overall economic efficiency by 16.5%, and increase the renewable integration rate by 4.5%, with an additional 8.6% of carbon reduction that can be achieved by adopting EU carbon price policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulong Yang & Songyuan Li & Nan Zhang & Zhongwen Yan & Weiyang Liu & Songnan Wang, 2025. "Two-Level Optimal Scheduling of Electric–Aluminum–Carbon Energy System Considering Operational Safety of Electrolytic Aluminum Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1645-:d:1620111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1645/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1645/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulus, Moritz & Borggrefe, Frieder, 2011. "The potential of demand-side management in energy-intensive industries for electricity markets in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 432-441, February.
    2. Yang, Zhixue & Ren, Zhouyang & Li, Hui & Sun, Zhiyuan & Feng, Jianbing & Xia, Weiyi, 2024. "A multi-stage stochastic dispatching method for electricity‑hydrogen integrated energy systems driven by model and data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McPherson, Madeleine & Stoll, Brady, 2020. "Demand response for variable renewable energy integration: A proposed approach and its impacts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Wang, Shunchao, 2025. "Optimal sizing of Power-to-Ammonia plants: A stochastic two-stage mixed-integer programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    3. Will, Christian & Zimmermann, Florian & Ensslen, Axel & Fraunholz, Christoph & Jochem, Patrick & Keles, Dogan, 2024. "Can electric vehicle charging be carbon neutral? Uniting smart charging and renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    4. Farahmand, H. & Doorman, G.L., 2012. "Balancing market integration in the Northern European continent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 316-326.
    5. Stephan Nagl & Michaela Fürsch & Dietmar Lindenberger, 2013. "The Costs of Electricity Systems with a High Share of Fluctuating Renewables: A Stochastic Investment and Dispatch Optimization Model for Europe," The Energy Journal, , vol. 34(4), pages 151-180, October.
    6. Michael Schoepf & Martin Weibelzahl & Lisa Nowka, 2018. "The Impact of Substituting Production Technologies on the Economic Demand Response Potential in Industrial Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Neda Hajibandeh & Mehdi Ehsan & Soodabeh Soleymani & Miadreza Shafie-khah & João P. S. Catalão, 2017. "The Mutual Impact of Demand Response Programs and Renewable Energies: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Ge, Pingxu & Tang, Daogui & Yuan, Yuji & Guerrero, Josep M. & Zio, Enrico, 2025. "A hierarchical multi-objective co-optimization framework for sizing and energy management of coupled hydrogen-electricity energy storage systems at ports," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    9. Keyong Hu & Qingqing Yang & Lei Lu & Yu Zhang & Shuifa Sun & Ben Wang, 2025. "Two-Stage Distributionally Robust Optimal Scheduling for Integrated Energy Systems Considering Uncertainties in Renewable Generation and Loads," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Rusche, Simon & Weissflog., Jan & Wenninger, Simon & Häckel, Björn, 2023. "How flexible are energy flexibilities? Developing a flexibility score for revenue and risk analysis in industrial demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Cai, Qiran & Xu, Qingyang & Qing, Jing & Shi, Gang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2022. "Promoting wind and photovoltaics renewable energy integration through demand response: Dynamic pricing mechanism design and economic analysis for smart residential communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    12. Paterakis, Nikolaos G. & Erdinç, Ozan & Catalão, João P.S., 2017. "An overview of Demand Response: Key-elements and international experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 871-891.
    13. Richstein, Jörn C. & Hosseinioun, Seyed Saeed, 2020. "Industrial demand response: How network tariffs and regulation (do not) impact flexibility provision in electricity markets and reserves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. Rauner, Sebastian & Eichhorn, Marcus & Thrän, Daniela, 2016. "The spatial dimension of the power system: Investigating hot spots of Smart Renewable Power Provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1038-1050.
    15. Vanessa Zawodnik & Florian Christian Schwaiger & Christoph Sorger & Thomas Kienberger, 2024. "Tackling Uncertainty: Forecasting the Energy Consumption and Demand of an Electric Arc Furnace with Limited Knowledge on Process Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Grimm, Veronika & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2018. "Investment incentives for flexible demand options under different market designs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 372-389.
    17. Keles, Dogan & Bublitz, Andreas & Zimmermann, Florian & Genoese, Massimo & Fichtner, Wolf, 2016. "Analysis of design options for the electricity market: The German case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 884-901.
    18. Ma, Yiqun, 2016. "Demand Response Potential of Electricity End-users Facing Real Time Pricing," Research Report 16019-EEF, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    19. Alexander Kies & Bruno U. Schyska & Lueder Von Bremen, 2016. "The Demand Side Management Potential to Balance a Highly Renewable European Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Yang, Zhixue & Li, Hui & Zhang, Hongcai, 2025. "A power-to-methanol-based chemical industry system-aided decarbonization approach for power distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1645-:d:1620111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.