IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i11p2815-d1666782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Optimized Dynamic Benefit Evaluation Method for Pumped Storage Projects in the Context of the “Dual Carbon” Goal

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Feng

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    Department of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic Institute, Nanyang 473000, China
    College of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Qi Guo

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    College of Hydraulic and Environment Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Qian Liu

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Feihong Jian

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
    College of Hydraulic and Environment Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of a new power system under the “dual carbon” goal, pumped storage has gained increasing attention for its role in integrating renewable energy and enhancing power system flexibility and security. This study proposes a dynamic benefit evaluation method for pumped storage projects, addressing the limitations of static analyses in capturing the evolving benefit trends. In this paper, the multi-stage dynamic benefit evaluation model was constructed by introducing time-of-use tariffs, periodic capacity pricing mechanism, and ancillary service revenue prediction based on machine learning and the multiple regression method. Sensitivity analysis was applied to explore the impact of key parameter variations on economic indicators. The results show that the benefit structure differs significantly across stages, and with electricity market development, a diversified pattern supported by electricity, capacity, and ancillary service revenues will emerge. The application of the model to an actual operating pumped storage power station yielded an internal rate of return of 8.18%, a payback period of 16.4 years, and a 26% increase in net present value compared with traditional methods. The proposed model expands the theoretical framework for pumped storage benefit evaluation and provides strong support for investment decisions, policy design, and operational strategy optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Feng & Qi Guo & Qian Liu & Feihong Jian, 2025. "An Optimized Dynamic Benefit Evaluation Method for Pumped Storage Projects in the Context of the “Dual Carbon” Goal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2815-:d:1666782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2815/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2815/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anwar, Ahsan & Siddique, Muhammad & Eyup Dogan, & Sharif, Arshian, 2021. "The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 956-967.
    2. Matthias Schonlau & Rosie Yuyan Zou, 2020. "The random forest algorithm for statistical learning," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 3-29, March.
    3. Yudong Tan & Guosheng Xie & Yunhao Xiao & Yi Luo & Xintao Xie & Ming Wen, 2022. "Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Hybrid Pumped-Storage Power Stations Based on Improved Rank Correlation-Entropy Weight Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Tian, Bingying & He, Yongxiu & Zhou, Jinghan & Wang, Bingwen & Wang, Yi & Shi, Wenran, 2023. "Cost-sharing mechanisms for pumped storage plants at different market stages in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Papadakis C. Nikolaos & Fafalakis Marios & Katsaprakakis Dimitris, 2023. "A Review of Pumped Hydro Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-39, June.
    6. Yan Lu & Xuan Liu & Yan Zhang & Zhiqiao Yang & Yunna Wu, 2023. "Investment Efficiency Assessment Model for Pumped Storage Power Plants Considering Grid Operation Demand under Fuzzy Environment: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Yinguo Yang & Ying Yang & Qiuyu Lu & Dexu Liu & Pingping Xie & Mu Wang & Zhenfan Yu & Yang Liu, 2024. "Comprehensive Evaluation of a Pumped Storage Operation Effect Considering Multidimensional Benefits of a New Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Becker, Sascha O. & Voth, Hans-Joachim, 2023. "From the Death of God to the Rise of Hitler," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 688, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    2. Daniela Cristina Momete & Manuel Mihail Momete, 2021. "Map and Track the Performance in Education for Sustainable Development across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Mounir Dahmani & Mohamed Mabrouki & Ludovic Ragni, 2021. "Decoupling Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Economic Growth: A Case Study of Tunisia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Amin, Azka & bte Mohamed Yusoff, Nora Yusma & Peng, Sun & Magazzino, Cosimo & Sharif, Arshian & Kamran, Hafiz Waqas, 2025. "Driving sustainable development: The impact of energy transition, eco-innovation, mineral resources, and green growth on carbon emissions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    5. Ansari, Mohd Arshad, 2022. "Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Zhou, Yuanxiang & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Yin, Weichuan & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "The co-movements among renewable energy, total environmental tax, and ecological footprint in the United Kingdom: Evidence from wavelet local multiple correlation analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Ramesh Chandra Das & Tonmoy Chatterjee & Enrico Ivaldi, 2022. "Nexus between Housing Price and Magnitude of Pollution: Evidence from the Panel of Some High- and-Low Polluting Cities of the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Shang, Yunfeng & Han, Ding & Gozgor, Giray & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Sahoo, Bimal Kishore, 2022. "The impact of climate policy uncertainty on renewable and non-renewable energy demand in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 654-667.
    9. Maria Fotopoulou & Panagiotis Pediaditis & Niki Skopetou & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Sotirios Christopoulos & Avraam Kartalidis, 2024. "A Review of the Energy Storage Systems of Non-Interconnected European Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Xiaxuan He & Qifeng Yuan & Yinghong Qin & Junwen Lu & Gang Li, 2024. "Analysis of Surface Urban Heat Island in the Guangzhou-Foshan Metropolitan Area Based on Local Climate Zones," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-34, October.
    11. Chen, Ming & Chen, Junying, 2023. "Natural resources extraction in emerging economies: Does it promote sustainable development or crowd-out real sector?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nwani, Chinazaekpere & Bekun, Festus Victor & Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi & Agozie, Divine Q., 2022. "Discerning the role of renewable energy and energy efficiency in finding the path to cleaner consumption and production patterns: New insights from developing economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Ali, Mumtaz & Joof, Foday & Samour, Ahmed & Tursoy, Turgut & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Radulescu, Magdalena, 2023. "Testing the impacts of renewable energy, natural resources rent, and technological innovation on the ecological footprint in the USA: Evidence from Bootstrapping ARDL," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    14. Alharthi, Majed & Hanif, Imran & Alamoudi, Hawazen, 2022. "Impact of environmental pollution on human health and financial status of households in MENA countries: Future of using renewable energy to eliminate the environmental pollution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 338-346.
    15. Sakiru Adebola Solarin & Muhammed Sehid Gorus & Onder Ozgur, 2024. "Modelling the economic effect of inbound birth tourism: a random forest algorithm approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4223-4240, October.
    16. Murat Aslan & Onder Ozgur, 2024. "Financial dollarization and its effects on inflation and output in Turkey: a machine learning approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5777-5804, December.
    17. Maria A. F. Silva Dias & Yania Molina Souto & Bruno Biazeto & Enzo Todesco & Jose A. Zuñiga Mora & Dylana Vargas Navarro & Melvin Pérez Chinchilla & Carlos Madrigal Araya & Dayanna Arce Fernández & Be, 2024. "Reduction of Wind Speed Forecast Error in Costa Rica Tejona Wind Farm with Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
    18. Simshauser, P. & Gohde, N., 2024. "3-Party Covenant Financing of 'Semi-Regulated' Pumped Hydro Assets," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2425, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    19. Tomasz Rymarczyk & Konrad Niderla & Edward Kozłowski & Krzysztof Król & Joanna Maria Wyrwisz & Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed & Piotr Gołąbek, 2021. "Logistic Regression with Wave Preprocessing to Solve Inverse Problem in Industrial Tomography for Technological Process Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Lamperti, Fabio, 2024. "Unlocking machine learning for social sciences: The case for identifying Industry 4.0 adoption across business restructuring events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2815-:d:1666782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.