IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2024i1p118-d1557396.html

Benefits and Challenges of California Offshore Wind Electricity: An Updated Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Rose

    (Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
    Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Nathaniel Gundersen

    (Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Yamini Kumar

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Joshua Jacobs

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Isabel Reynoso

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Najmedin Meshkati

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

Abstract

Offshore wind (OSW) technology has recently been included in California’s plans to achieve 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045. As an emerging technology, many features of OSW are changing more rapidly than established renewable options and are shaped by local circumstances in unique ways that limit transferrable experiences globally. This paper fills a gap in the literature by providing an updated technological assessment of OSW in California to determine its viability and competitiveness in the state’s electricity generation mix to achieve its near-term energy and environmental goals. Through a critical synthesis and extrapolation of technical, social, and economic analyses, we identify several major improvements in its potential. First, we note that while estimates of OSW’s costs per MWh of installed capacity have generally documented and projected a long-term decline, recent technical, microeconomic, and macroeconomic factors have caused significant backsliding of this momentum. Second, we project that the potential dollar value benefits of OSW’s greenhouse gas reduction capabilities have increased by one to two orders of magnitude, primarily due to major upward revisions of the social cost of carbon. Several co-benefits, including enhanced reliability, economic growth, and environmental justice, look to be increasingly promising due to a combination of technological advances and policy initiatives. Despite these advancements, OSW continues to face several engineering and broader challenges. We assess the current status of these challenges, as well as current and future strategies to address them. We conclude that OSW is now overall an even more attractive electricity-generating option than at the beginning of this decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Rose & Nathaniel Gundersen & Yamini Kumar & Joshua Jacobs & Isabel Reynoso & Najmedin Meshkati, 2024. "Benefits and Challenges of California Offshore Wind Electricity: An Updated Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:118-:d:1557396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacobson, Mark Z. & von Krauland, Anna-Katharina & Coughlin, Stephen J. & Palmer, Frances C. & Smith, Miles M., 2022. "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 430-442.
    2. ., 2024. "Rethinking natural resources, energy and rural environments," Chapters, in: Rethinking Rural Studies, chapter 9, pages 153-175, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Bilal, Adrien & Känzig, Diego, 2024. "The Macroeconomic Impact of Climate Change: Global vs. Local Temperature," CEPR Discussion Papers 19203, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Shawhan, Daniel & Robson, Sally & Russell, Ethan, 2024. "Offshore Wind Power Examined: Effects, Benefits, and Costs of Offshore Wind Farms Along the US Atlantic and Gulf Coasts," RFF Working Paper Series 24-17, Resources for the Future.
    5. Ryan Wiser & Joseph Rand & Joachim Seel & Philipp Beiter & Erin Baker & Eric Lantz & Patrick Gilman, 2021. "Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 555-565, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Liu & Keteng Ke & Shimin Yang & Chuang Yang & Zhongyi Sui & Chunhui Zhou & Lichuan Wu, 2025. "Evaluation of Ship Importance in Offshore Wind Farm Area Based on Fusion Gravity Model in Complex Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrien Bilal & James H. Stock, 2025. "A Guide to Macroeconomics and Climate Change," NBER Working Papers 33567, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Bilal, Adrien & Stock, James, 2025. "Macroeconomics and Climate Change," CEPR Discussion Papers 20659, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Aggarwal, Raavi & Missbach, Leonard & Somanathan, E. & Steckel, Jan Christoph & Sterner, Thomas, 2025. "Negative health effects of carbon prices can outweigh the climate benefits in developing countries," EfD Discussion Paper 25-9, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    4. Kear, Sarah & Marangon Lima, Luana M. & Kittner, Noah, 2025. "Charging forward: A greenhouse gas emissions analysis of New York State's electric vehicle and clean energy goals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Tarsia, Romano, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of weather shocks on firm economic performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. B. N. Porfiriev & A. Yu. Kolpakov & E. A. Lazeeva, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on the Russian Economy Using Integrated Assessment Models (IAM)," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 35-44, February.
    7. Vicente Ferreira & Joao Pedro Ferreira & Dario Guarascio & Francesco Zezza, 2024. "Shockflation in the EU: sectoral shocks, cost-push inflation and structural asymmetries in core and periphery countries," LEM Papers Series 2024/31, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    8. Qiannan Zhu & Zhengyu Zhang, 2025. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction: Evidence From China's Listed Firms," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 410-430, December.
    9. Kumar, Naveen & Maiti, Dibyendu, 2025. "Climate change, state capacity and uneven growth: A disaggregated analysis of India," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Zarah Thiel & Reza Fazeli & Frank Jotzo & Andreas Löschel, 2025. "Clean Hydrogen Pathways: Expert Projections from Australia and Implications for the World," CESifo Working Paper Series 12161, CESifo.
    11. García-Gómez, Conrado Diego & Demir, Ender & Díez-Esteban, José María, 2026. "How climate vulnerability affects IPO activity: Evidence from OECD countries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Pablo Garcia Sanchez & Olivier Pierrard, 2026. "The rich, the poor, and the carbon tax," BCL working papers 205, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    13. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Huang, Tao & Yim, Steve Hung Lam, 2024. "Assessment of urban wind energy resource in Hong Kong based on multi-instrument observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Su, Chi-Wei & Yuan, Xi & Umar, Muhammad & Chang, Tsangyao, 2022. "Dynamic price linkage of energies in transformation: Evidence from quantile connectedness," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Kim, Dukpa & Kim, Yun Jung, 2025. "Macroeconomic impacts of climate change: A semi-structural analysis of unexpected weather conditions in Korea," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Torsten Clemens & Martin Hunyadi-Gall & Andreas Lunzer & Vladislav Arekhov & Martin Datler & Albert Gauer, 2024. "Wind–Photovoltaic–Electrolyzer-Underground Hydrogen Storage System for Cost-Effective Seasonal Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Shields, Matt & Beiter, Philipp & Nunemaker, Jake & Cooperman, Aubryn & Duffy, Patrick, 2021. "Impacts of turbine and plant upsizing on the levelized cost of energy for offshore wind," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    18. Rezaei, Mostafa & Akimov, Alexandr & Gray, Evan Mac A., 2024. "Techno-economics of offshore wind-based dynamic hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    19. Burke, Matt & Mohaddes, Kamiar & Raissi, Mehdi, 2026. "The Adaptation Imperative: Climate Change and Sovereign Credit Risk," INET Oxford Working Papers 2026-03, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    20. Italo Fernandes & Felipe M. Pimenta & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2022. "Exploring the Complementarity of Offshore Wind Sites to Reduce the Seasonal Variability of Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:118-:d:1557396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.