IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2024i1p118-d1557396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits and Challenges of California Offshore Wind Electricity: An Updated Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Rose

    (Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
    Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Nathaniel Gundersen

    (Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Yamini Kumar

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Joshua Jacobs

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Isabel Reynoso

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Najmedin Meshkati

    (Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

Abstract

Offshore wind (OSW) technology has recently been included in California’s plans to achieve 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045. As an emerging technology, many features of OSW are changing more rapidly than established renewable options and are shaped by local circumstances in unique ways that limit transferrable experiences globally. This paper fills a gap in the literature by providing an updated technological assessment of OSW in California to determine its viability and competitiveness in the state’s electricity generation mix to achieve its near-term energy and environmental goals. Through a critical synthesis and extrapolation of technical, social, and economic analyses, we identify several major improvements in its potential. First, we note that while estimates of OSW’s costs per MWh of installed capacity have generally documented and projected a long-term decline, recent technical, microeconomic, and macroeconomic factors have caused significant backsliding of this momentum. Second, we project that the potential dollar value benefits of OSW’s greenhouse gas reduction capabilities have increased by one to two orders of magnitude, primarily due to major upward revisions of the social cost of carbon. Several co-benefits, including enhanced reliability, economic growth, and environmental justice, look to be increasingly promising due to a combination of technological advances and policy initiatives. Despite these advancements, OSW continues to face several engineering and broader challenges. We assess the current status of these challenges, as well as current and future strategies to address them. We conclude that OSW is now overall an even more attractive electricity-generating option than at the beginning of this decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Rose & Nathaniel Gundersen & Yamini Kumar & Joshua Jacobs & Isabel Reynoso & Najmedin Meshkati, 2024. "Benefits and Challenges of California Offshore Wind Electricity: An Updated Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:118-:d:1557396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrien Bilal & Diego R. Känzig, 2024. "The Macroeconomic Impact of Climate Change: Global vs. Local Temperature," NBER Working Papers 32450, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. ., 2024. "Rethinking natural resources, energy and rural environments," Chapters, in: Rethinking Rural Studies, chapter 9, pages 153-175, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Robson, Sally & Russell, Ethan & Shawhan, Daniel, 2024. "Offshore Wind Power Examined: Effects, Benefits, and Costs of Offshore Wind Farms Along the US Atlantic and Gulf Coasts," RFF Working Paper Series 24-17, Resources for the Future.
    4. Ryan Wiser & Joseph Rand & Joachim Seel & Philipp Beiter & Erin Baker & Eric Lantz & Patrick Gilman, 2021. "Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 555-565, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vicente Ferreira & Joao Pedro Ferreira & Dario Guarascio & Francesco Zezza, 2024. "Shockflation in the EU: sectoral shocks, cost-push inflation and structural asymmetries in core and periphery countries," LEM Papers Series 2024/31, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    2. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Huang, Tao & Yim, Steve Hung Lam, 2024. "Assessment of urban wind energy resource in Hong Kong based on multi-instrument observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Torsten Clemens & Martin Hunyadi-Gall & Andreas Lunzer & Vladislav Arekhov & Martin Datler & Albert Gauer, 2024. "Wind–Photovoltaic–Electrolyzer-Underground Hydrogen Storage System for Cost-Effective Seasonal Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Shields, Matt & Beiter, Philipp & Nunemaker, Jake & Cooperman, Aubryn & Duffy, Patrick, 2021. "Impacts of turbine and plant upsizing on the levelized cost of energy for offshore wind," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    5. Rezaei, Mostafa & Akimov, Alexandr & Gray, Evan Mac A., 2024. "Techno-economics of offshore wind-based dynamic hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    6. Italo Fernandes & Felipe M. Pimenta & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2022. "Exploring the Complementarity of Offshore Wind Sites to Reduce the Seasonal Variability of Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Piotr W. Saługa & Krzysztof Zamasz & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna & Marcin Malec, 2021. "Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate and Its Components for Onshore Wind Farms at the Feasibility Stage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Francesco Jacopo Pintus & Jan P.A.M. Jacobs & Elmer Sterken & Jan Jacobs, 2024. "Fiscal Impacts of Climate Anomalies," CESifo Working Paper Series 11548, CESifo.
    9. Teresa Janz & Gassmann,Franziska & de Ervin,Lyliana Gayoso, 2024. "Weathering Shocks : Unraveling the Effects of Short-Term Weather Shocks on Poverty in Paraguay," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10970, The World Bank.
    10. Broeders, Dirk & Dimitrov, Daniel & Verhoeven, Niek, 2025. "Climate-linked bonds," Working Paper Series 3011, European Central Bank.
    11. Pryor, Sara C. & Barthelmie, Rebecca J., 2024. "Wind shadows impact planning of large offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    12. Berg, Kimberly A. & Curtis, Chadwick C. & Mark, Nelson C., 2024. "GDP and temperature: Evidence on cross-country response heterogeneity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Nguyen, Nhu “Claire” & Johnson, David R., 2024. "The impacts of local wind power objection on the power system of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator area," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    14. Kai Lessmann & Friedemann Gruner & Matthias Kalkuhl & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2024. "Emissions Trading with Clean-up Certificates: Deterring Mitigation or Increasing Ambition?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11167, CESifo.
    15. Eickmeier, Sandra & Quast, Josefine & Schüler, Yves, 2024. "Macroeconomic and Financial Effects of Natural Disasters," CEPR Discussion Papers 18940, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Elias Hasler, 2025. "Assessing the Global Impact of EU Carbon Pricing: Economic and Climate Spillovers," Working Papers 2025-01, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    17. Marcelle Chauvet & Claudio Morana & Murilo Silva, 2025. "Extreme Weather in Europe: Determinants and Economic Impact," Working Papers 547, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics.
    18. Keiner, Dominik & Salcedo-Puerto, Orlando & Immonen, Ekaterina & van Sark, Wilfried G.J.H.M. & Nizam, Yoosuf & Shadiya, Fathmath & Duval, Justine & Delahaye, Timur & Gulagi, Ashish & Breyer, Christian, 2022. "Powering an island energy system by offshore floating technologies towards 100% renewables: A case for the Maldives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    19. Dong, Weiwei & Zhao, Guohua & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan & Ubay, Gözde Gülseven, 2022. "A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 321-337.
    20. Rizwan Haider & Xin Li & Wei Shi & Zaibin Lin & Qing Xiao & Haisheng Zhao, 2024. "Review of Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Design of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-37, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:118-:d:1557396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.