IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i9p2144-d1386736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Theoretical, Minimal Intervention Potential of Floating Solar in Greece: A Policy-Oriented Planning Exercise on Lentic Water Systems of the Greek Mainland

Author

Listed:
  • Despoina Athanasiou

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, University of West Attica, 250 Thivon Street & Petrou Ralli Avenue, 12241 Athens, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Zafirakis

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, University of West Attica, 250 Thivon Street & Petrou Ralli Avenue, 12241 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

According to the recent revision of the Greek National Energy and Climate Plan, the country sets out to accomplish an ambitious target concerning the integration of renewables in the local electricity mix during the ongoing decade, at the levels of 80% by 2030. This implies the need to more than double the existing wind and PV capacity at the national level, which in turn introduces numerous challenges. Amongst them, spatial planning for new RES installations seems to be the most demanding, with the adoption of novel technological solutions in the field of RES potentially holding a key role. New technologies, like offshore wind and floating solar, are gradually gaining maturity and may offer such an alternative, challenged at the same time however by the need to entail minimum disruption for local ecosystems. To that end, we currently assess the theoretical potential of floating PVs for lentic water systems of the Greek mainland. We do so by looking into 53 different lentic water systems across the Greek territory that meet the constraint of 1 km 2 minimum surface area, and we proceed with the estimation of the relevant floating PV capacity per system under the application of a minimal intervention approach, assuming PV coverage of 1% over the total lentic water system area. In this context, our findings indicate a maximum, aggregate theoretical capacity that could exceed 2 GW p at the national level, with the respective annual energy yield reaching approximately 4 TWh or, equivalently, >6% of the country’s anticipated annual electricity consumption in 2030. Finally, our results extend further, offering a regional level analysis and a set of policy directions and considerations on the development of floating solar in Greece, while also designating the energy merits of floating PVs against similar, land-based installations.

Suggested Citation

  • Despoina Athanasiou & Dimitrios Zafirakis, 2024. "Assessing the Theoretical, Minimal Intervention Potential of Floating Solar in Greece: A Policy-Oriented Planning Exercise on Lentic Water Systems of the Greek Mainland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2144-:d:1386736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kulat, Muhammed Imran & Tosun, Kursad & Karaveli, Abdullah Bugrahan & Yucel, Ismail & Akinoglu, Bulent Gultekin, 2023. "A sound potential against energy dependency and climate change challenges: Floating photovoltaics on water reservoirs of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 694-709.
    2. Vidović, V. & Krajačić, G. & Matak, N. & Stunjek, G. & Mimica, M., 2023. "Review of the potentials for implementation of floating solar panels on lakes and water reservoirs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Gasparatos, Alexandros & Doll, Christopher N.H. & Esteban, Miguel & Ahmed, Abubakari & Olang, Tabitha A., 2017. "Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 161-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C.J., Ramanan & Lim, King Hann & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Roy, Sukanta & Bora, Bhaskor Jyoti & Medhi, Bhaskar Jyoti, 2024. "Towards sustainable power generation: Recent advancements in floating photovoltaic technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Yang Shen & Xiuwu Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Kowsar, Abu & Hassan, Mahedi & Rana, Md Tasnim & Haque, Nawshad & Faruque, Md Hasan & Ahsan, Saifuddin & Alam, Firoz, 2023. "Optimization and techno-economic assessment of 50 MW floating solar power plant on Hakaluki marsh land in Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    5. Jåstad, Eirik Ogner & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2023. "Modelling emission and land-use impacts of altered bioenergy use in the future energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Mihaela Simionescu & Yuriy Bilan & Emília Krajňáková & Dalia Streimikiene & Stanisław Gędek, 2019. "Renewable Energy in the Electricity Sector and GDP per Capita in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Abdul Ghani Olabi & Nabila Shehata & Hussein M. Maghrabie & Lobna A. Heikal & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Shek Mohammod Atiqure Rahman & Sheikh Khaleduzzaman Shah & Enas Taha Sayed, 2022. "Progress in Solar Thermal Systems and Their Role in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Coilín ÓhAiseadha & Gerré Quinn & Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Willie Soon, 2020. "Energy and Climate Policy—An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-49, September.
    9. Olga Laiza Kupika & Edson Gandiwa & Godwell Nhamo, 2019. "Green economy initiatives in the face of climate change: experiences from the Middle Zambezi Biosphere Reserve, Zimbabwe," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2507-2533, October.
    10. Haspolat, Emre & Cicek, Doga Derman & Gokmener, Serkan & Melek, Abiddin Berhan & Deveci, Muhammet & Oguz, Elif, 2024. "Site selection of floating photovoltaic systems on hydropower reservoirs using fuzzy sine trigonometric decision-making model: Turkey as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    11. Alexandra Vrînceanu & Ines Grigorescu & Monica Dumitrașcu & Irena Mocanu & Cristina Dumitrică & Dana Micu & Gheorghe Kucsicsa & Bianca Mitrică, 2019. "Impacts of Photovoltaic Farms on the Environment in the Romanian Plain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Jan Macháč & Lenka Zaňková, 2020. "Renewables—To Build or Not? Czech Approach to Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources with an Emphasis on Municipality Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2022. "Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    14. David Milesi-Gaches, 2020. "Assessing implications of different energy sources: Quito, Ecuador [Évaluation des implications de différentes sources d'énergie : Quito, Équateur]," Working Papers hal-03555312, HAL.
    15. Haris Doukas & Alexandros Nikas & Giorgos Stamtsis & Ioannis Tsipouridis, 2020. "The Green Versus Green Trap and a Way Forward," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-6, October.
    16. Sánchez, A.S. & Almeida, M.B. & Torres, E.A. & Kalid, R.A. & Cohim, E. & Gasparatos, A., 2018. "Alternative biodiesel feedstock systems in the Semi-arid region of Brazil: Implications for ecosystem services," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2744-2758.
    17. Claire Burch & Rebecca Loraamm & Travis Gliedt, 2020. "The “Green on Green” Conflict in Wind Energy Development: A Case Study of Environmentally Conscious Individuals in Oklahoma, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Botelho, Anabela & Lourenço-Gomes, Lina & Pinto, Lígia & Sousa, Sara & Valente, Marieta, 2017. "Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: The application of two stated preferences approaches to a case-study in Portugal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 191-198.
    19. Leon Sander & Christopher Jung & Dirk Schindler, 2024. "Global Review on Environmental Impacts of Onshore Wind Energy in the Field of Tension between Human Societies and Natural Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-33, June.
    20. Pérez-Sánchez, Modesto & Sánchez-Romero, Francisco-Javier & Zapata, Francisco A. & López-Jiménez, P. Amparo & Ramos, Helena M., 2024. "Zero discharge: An optimized strategy to improve the hydric deficit in the Mediterranean area by pumped hydro storage. Case study of Alicante, Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2144-:d:1386736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.