IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1866-d1375218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outlook for Offshore Wind Energy Development in Mexico from WRF Simulations and CMIP6 Projections

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime Meza-Carreto

    (Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Rosario Romero-Centeno

    (Instituto de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y Cambio Climático, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Bernardo Figueroa-Espinoza

    (Laboratorio de Ingeniería y Procesos Costeros, Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Puerto de Abrigo s/n, Sisal 97355, Mexico)

  • Efraín Moreles

    (Unidad Académica Procesos Oceánicos y Costeros, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Carlos López-Villalobos

    (Instituto de Energías Renovables, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Xochicalco s/n, Temixco 62580, Mexico)

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive assessment of the offshore wind energy potential in Mexico across 40 years (1979–2018) of numerical simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and data from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). The WRF identifies three regions with moderate to good wind potential: off the north coast of Tamaulipas (Zone I), the northwest coast of Yucatan (Zone II), and the Gulf of Tehuantepec (Zone III). The analysis involves comparing 47 CMIP6 climate models with the WRF results and selecting the best performing models to obtain future projections for the short term (2040–2069) and the long term (2070–2099). Two ensemble-based strategies were implemented. The first one, which uses an intersection approach from which four CMIP6 models were considered, reveals positive percentage differences in Zone II for both future projections, especially for the long-term one. In Zones I and III, positive values are also observed near the coast, mainly for the long-term projection, but they are considerably lower compared to those in Zone II. The second ensemble strategy uses weight assignment through the Mean Absolute Percentage Error, so that a greater weight is given to the model that performed better in each particular zone, potentially providing more accurate results. The findings suggest the likelihood of increased offshore wind energy in these three zones of Mexico, for both short- and long-term future projections, with positive percentage differences of up to 10% in certain areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime Meza-Carreto & Rosario Romero-Centeno & Bernardo Figueroa-Espinoza & Efraín Moreles & Carlos López-Villalobos, 2024. "Outlook for Offshore Wind Energy Development in Mexico from WRF Simulations and CMIP6 Projections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1866-:d:1375218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1866/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1866/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A., 2011. "Assessment of wind energy potentiality at Kudat and Labuan, Malaysia using Weibull distribution function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 985-992.
    2. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Li-Rong & Ding, Zhi-Li & Fu, Yang, 2025. "From macro to micro: A multi-scale method for assessing coastal wind energy potential in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miao, Haozeyu & Xu, Haiming & Huang, Gang & Yang, Kai, 2023. "Evaluation and future projections of wind energy resources over the Northern Hemisphere in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 809-821.
    2. Liang, Yushi & Wu, Chunbing & Ji, Xiaodong & Zhang, Mulan & Li, Yiran & He, Jianjun & Qin, Zhiheng, 2022. "Estimation of the influences of spatiotemporal variations in air density on wind energy assessment in China based on deep neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    3. Nor, Khalid Mohamed & Shaaban, Mohamed & Abdul Rahman, Hasimah, 2014. "Feasibility assessment of wind energy resources in Malaysia based on NWP models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 147-154.
    4. Lv, Furong & Tang, Haiping, 2025. "Assessing the impact of climate change on the optimal solar–wind hybrid power generation potential in China: A focus on stability and complementarity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Amr Khaled Khamees & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Makram R. Eskaros & Mahmoud A. Attia & Mariam A. Sameh, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow with Stochastic Renewable Energy Using Three Mixture Component Distribution Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. J. Wang, 2016. "Reviews of seismicity around Taiwan: Weibull distribution," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1651-1668, February.
    7. Lidong Zhang & Qikai Li & Yuanjun Guo & Zhile Yang & Lei Zhang, 2018. "An Investigation of Wind Direction and Speed in a Featured Wind Farm Using Joint Probability Distribution Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Das, Himadry Shekhar & Tan, Chee Wei & Yatim, A.H.M. & Lau, Kwan Yiew, 2017. "Feasibility analysis of hybrid photovoltaic/battery/fuel cell energy system for an indigenous residence in East Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1332-1347.
    9. Vu Dinh, Quang & Doan, Quang-Van & Ngo-Duc, Thanh & Nguyen Dinh, Van & Dinh Duc, Nguyen, 2022. "Offshore wind resource in the context of global climate change over a tropical area," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    10. deCastro, M. & Rusu, L. & Arguilé-Pérez, B. & Ribeiro, A. & Costoya, X. & Carvalho, D. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2024. "Different approaches to analyze the impact of future climate change on the exploitation of wave energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Kang, Dongbum & Ko, Kyungnam & Huh, Jongchul, 2015. "Determination of extreme wind values using the Gumbel distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 51-58.
    12. El Alimi, Souheil & Maatallah, Taher & Dahmouni, Anouar Wajdi & Ben Nasrallah, Sassi, 2012. "Modeling and investigation of the wind resource in the gulf of Tunis, Tunisia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5466-5478.
    13. Suwarno Suwarno & M. Fitra Zambak, 2021. "The Probability Density Function for Wind Speed Using Modified Weibull Distribution," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 544-550.
    14. Redha, Adel Mohammed & Dincer, Ibrahim & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2011. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of wind energy systems: An application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4002-4010.
    15. Arslan, Talha & Bulut, Y. Murat & Altın Yavuz, Arzu, 2014. "Comparative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 820-825.
    16. Yu, Jie & Chen, Kuilin & Mori, Junichi & Rashid, Mudassir M., 2013. "A Gaussian mixture copula model based localized Gaussian process regression approach for long-term wind speed prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 673-686.
    17. Morteza Aien & Omid Mahdavi, 2020. "On the Way of Policy Making to Reduce the Reliance of Fossil Fuels: Case Study of Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    18. He, J.Y. & Li, Q.S. & Chan, P.W. & Zhao, X.D., 2023. "Assessment of future wind resources under climate change using a multi-model and multi-method ensemble approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    19. Abul Kalam Azad & Mohammad Golam Rasul & Talal Yusaf, 2014. "Statistical Diagnosis of the Best Weibull Methods for Wind Power Assessment for Agricultural Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, May.
    20. Muhammad Shoaib & Imran Siddiqui & Shafiqur Rehman & Saif Ur Rehman & Shamim Khan & Aref Lashin, 2016. "Comparison of Wind Energy Generation Using the Maximum Entropy Principle and the Weibull Distribution Function," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1866-:d:1375218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.