IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p334-d1014786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Power Flow with Stochastic Renewable Energy Using Three Mixture Component Distribution Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Amr Khaled Khamees

    (Engineering Physics and Mathematics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt)

  • Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt, Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Makram R. Eskaros

    (Engineering Physics and Mathematics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt)

  • Mahmoud A. Attia

    (Electrical Power & Machines Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt)

  • Mariam A. Sameh

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt, Cairo 11835, Egypt)

Abstract

The growing usage of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind energy, has increased the electrical system’s unpredictability. The stochastic behavior of these sources must be considered to obtain significantly more accurate conclusions in the analysis of power systems. To depict renewable energy systems, the three-component mixture distribution (TCMD) is introduced in this study. The mixture distribution (MD) is created by combining the Weibull and Gamma distributions. The results show that TCMD is better than original distributions in simulating wind speed and solar irradiance by reducing the error between real data and the distribution curve. Additionally, this study examines the optimal power flow (OPF) in electrical networks using the two stochastic models of solar and wind energy. The parameters of the probability distribution function (PDF) are optimized using the Mayfly algorithm (MA), which also solves single- and multi-objective OPF issues. Then, to prove the accuracy of the MA method in solving the OPF problem, single- and multi-objective OPF is applied on a standard IEEE-30 bus system to minimize fuel cost, power loss, thermal unit emissions, and voltage security index (VSI), and results are compared with other metaheuristic methods. The outcomes show that the MA technique is dependable and effective in overseeing this challenging problem. Additionally, the suggested OPF MA-based is studied in the OPF problem while accounting for the uncertainty in the models of the wind and solar systems and taking the emissions, VSI, power loss, and fuel cost into consideration in the objective function. The significance of the work lies in the application of a unique optimization technique to a hybrid electrical system using TCMD stochastic model using actual wind and solar data. The proposed MA method could be valuable to system operators as a decision-making aid when dealing with hybrid power systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Amr Khaled Khamees & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Makram R. Eskaros & Mahmoud A. Attia & Mariam A. Sameh, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow with Stochastic Renewable Energy Using Three Mixture Component Distribution Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:334-:d:1014786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan, Xiaohui & Zhang, Binqiao & Wang, Pengtao & Liang, Ji & Yuan, Yanbin & Huang, Yuehua & Lei, Xiaohui, 2017. "Multi-objective optimal power flow based on improved strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 70-82.
    2. Amr Khaled Khamees & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Makram R. Eskaros & Adel El-Shahat & Mahmoud A. Attia, 2021. "Optimal Power Flow Solution of Wind-Integrated Power System Using Novel Metaheuristic Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Carta, J.A. & Ramírez, P., 2007. "Analysis of two-component mixture Weibull statistics for estimation of wind speed distributions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 518-531.
    4. Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A., 2011. "Assessment of wind energy potentiality at Kudat and Labuan, Malaysia using Weibull distribution function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 985-992.
    5. Morgan, Vincent T., 1995. "Statistical distributions of wind parameters at Sydney, Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 39-47.
    6. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Wang, Ling & Yan, Xuesong & Hu, Chengyu, 2020. "Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Niknam, Taher & Narimani, Mohammad rasoul & Jabbari, Masoud & Malekpour, Ahmad Reza, 2011. "A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6420-6432.
    8. Spiecker, Stephan & Weber, Christoph, 2014. "The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – A scenario analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 185-197.
    9. Sirote Khunkitti & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn & Rongrit Chatthaworn & Neville R. Watson, 2018. "A Hybrid DA-PSO Optimization Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimal Power Flow Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Nguyen, Thang Trung, 2019. "A high performance social spider optimization algorithm for optimal power flow solution with single objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 218-240.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaheen, Abdullah M. & El-Sehiemy, Ragab A. & Alharthi, Mosleh M. & Ghoneim, Sherif S.M. & Ginidi, Ahmed R., 2021. "Multi-objective jellyfish search optimizer for efficient power system operation based on multi-dimensional OPF framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Wang, Ling & Yan, Xuesong & Hu, Chengyu, 2020. "Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Based on Hunger Games Search with Pareto Concept Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-31, November.
    4. Ali S. Alghamdi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow in Wind–Photovoltaic Energy Regulation Systems Using a Modified Turbulent Water Flow-Based Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Sherif S. M. Ghoneim & Mohamed F. Kotb & Hany M. Hasanien & Mosleh M. Alharthi & Attia A. El-Fergany, 2021. "Cost Minimizations and Performance Enhancements of Power Systems Using Spherical Prune Differential Evolution Algorithm Including Modal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    6. El Sehiemy, Ragab A. & Selim, F. & Bentouati, Bachir & Abido, M.A., 2020. "A novel multi-objective hybrid particle swarm and salp optimization algorithm for technical-economical-environmental operation in power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Hu, Chengyu & Yan, Xuesong & Wang, Ling & Gu, Qiong, 2021. "Adaptive constraint differential evolution for optimal power flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Mohammad Zohrul Islam & Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab & Veerapandiyan Veerasamy & Hashim Hizam & Nashiren Farzilah Mailah & Josep M. Guerrero & Mohamad Nasrun Mohd Nasir, 2020. "A Harris Hawks Optimization Based Single- and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Considering Environmental Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "A Slime Mould Algorithm Programming for Solving Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems with Pareto Front Approach: A Case Study of the Iraqi Super Grid High Voltage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-33, October.
    10. Amr Khaled Khamees & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Makram R. Eskaros & Adel El-Shahat & Mahmoud A. Attia, 2021. "Optimal Power Flow Solution of Wind-Integrated Power System Using Novel Metaheuristic Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Jiang, Haiyan & Wang, Jianzhou & Wu, Jie & Geng, Wei, 2017. "Comparison of numerical methods and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for estimating parameters for wind energy potential assessment in low wind regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1199-1217.
    12. Zhang, Jingrui & Wang, Silu & Tang, Qinghui & Zhou, Yulu & Zeng, Tao, 2019. "An improved NSGA-III integrating adaptive elimination strategy to solution of many-objective optimal power flow problems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 945-957.
    13. Mehr Gul & Nengling Tai & Wentao Huang & Muhammad Haroon Nadeem & Moduo Yu, 2019. "Assessment of Wind Power Potential and Economic Analysis at Hyderabad in Pakistan: Powering to Local Communities Using Wind Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Arslan, Talha & Bulut, Y. Murat & Altın Yavuz, Arzu, 2014. "Comparative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 820-825.
    15. Xiao, Hui & Cao, Minhao, 2020. "Balancing the demand and supply of a power grid system via reliability modeling and maintenance optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Abdullah Khan & Hashim Hizam & Noor Izzri Abdul-Wahab & Mohammad Lutfi Othman, 2020. "Solution of Optimal Power Flow Using Non-Dominated Sorting Multi Objective Based Hybrid Firefly and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Sirote Khunkitti & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn & Rongrit Chatthaworn & Neville R. Watson, 2018. "A Hybrid DA-PSO Optimization Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimal Power Flow Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Zhou, Zhe & Zhang, Jianyun & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng & Georgiadis, Michael C. & Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N., 2013. "A two-stage stochastic programming model for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 135-144.
    19. Sirote Khunkitti & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems Based on Slime Mould Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Mahmoud A. Ali & Salah Kamel & Mohamed H. Hassan & Emad M. Ahmed & Mohana Alanazi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow Solution of Power Systems with Renewable Energy Sources Using White Sharks Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:334-:d:1014786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.