IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i15p3860-d1450400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Energy-Consuming Rights Trading Policies Help to Curb Air Pollution? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingguang Liu

    (School of Politics and Public Administration, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Jue Zhang

    (School of Politics and Public Administration, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Gaoyang Li

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

Energy-consuming rights trading policies (ECRTPs) represent a significant institutional innovation for China aimed at achieving the dual control targets of total energy consumption and energy consumption intensity. However, the effectiveness of these policies in curbing air pollution remains uncertain. This study treats ECRTPs as a quasi-natural experiment to empirically analyze their impact on air pollution, utilizing panel data encompassing 277 prefecture-level cities in China covering the period from 2011 to 2021. Analytical methods applied include a Difference-in-Differences model, a mediation effects model, and a triple differences model to explore the effects of ECRTPs on air pollution. The findings reveal that ECRTP can significantly suppress air pollution, and this conclusion remains valid even after conducting robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that ECRTPs suppress air pollution by boosting energy efficiency, advancing industrial structure upgrading, and facilitating technological innovation. Further heterogeneous studies show that ECRTPs have a more pronounced inhibitory effect on air pollution in cities that are economically and socially developed, exhibit greater energy-saving potential, are characterized as resource-based cities, and serve as key regions for the prevention and control of air pollution. The research conclusion provides empirical evidence and policy implications for evaluating the environmental effects of ECRTPs and further improving China’s energy-consuming rights trading system, as well as offering references and guidance for other developing countries to put forward ECRTPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingguang Liu & Jue Zhang & Gaoyang Li, 2024. "Can Energy-Consuming Rights Trading Policies Help to Curb Air Pollution? Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:15:p:3860-:d:1450400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/15/3860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/15/3860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Xiaoping & Yu, Yuxuan & Jiang, Shuo, 2023. "City centrality, population density and energy efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Chen, Xiaohui & Teng, Lei & Chen, Wen, 2022. "How does FinTech affect the development of the digital economy? Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Ufuk Akcigit & Salomé Baslandze & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2016. "Taxation and the International Mobility of Inventors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(10), pages 2930-2981, October.
    4. Ning Zhang & Weijie Zhang, 2020. "Can sustainable operations achieve economic benefit and energy saving for manufacturing industries in China?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 145-168, July.
    5. Pier Mannuccio Mannucci & Massimo Franchini, 2017. "Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution in Developing Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-8, September.
    6. Matthew A. Cole & Eric Neumayer, 2003. "Examining the Impact of Demographic Factors On Air Pollution," Labor and Demography 0312005, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 13 May 2004.
    7. Luo, Zhi & Wan, Guanghua & Wang, Chen & Zhang, Xun, 2018. "Urban pollution and road infrastructure: A case study of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 171-183.
    8. Ma, Guangcheng & Qin, Jiahong & Zhang, Yumeng, 2023. "Does the carbon emissions trading system reduce carbon emissions by promoting two-way FDI in developing countries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies and cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Du, Minzhe & Wu, Fenger & Ye, Danfeng & Zhao, Yating & Liao, Liping, 2023. "Exploring the effects of energy quota trading policy on carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    10. Xueping Wu & Ming Gao, 2021. "Effects of different environmental regulations and their heterogeneity on air pollution control in China," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 140-166, December.
    11. Wang, Yizhong & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei, 2022. "Joint or separate? An economic-environmental comparison of energy-consuming and carbon emissions permits trading in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Du, Minzhe & Wu, Fenger & Luo, Lichun & Wang, Qiya & Liao, Liping, 2025. "Spatial effects of the market-based energy allocation on energy efficiency: A quasi-natural experiment of energy quota trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Meiling & Liu, Zichen & Zhou, Bingxuan, 2025. "Towards carbon neutrality: The impact of energy right trading policy on carbon performance of manufacturing enterprises," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    2. Cui, Huanyu & Cao, Yuequn, 2024. "Energy rights trading policy, spatial spillovers, and energy utilization performance: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Du, Minzhe & Wu, Fenger & Luo, Lichun & Wang, Qiya & Liao, Liping, 2025. "Spatial effects of the market-based energy allocation on energy efficiency: A quasi-natural experiment of energy quota trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    4. Yi, Yuxin & Zhang, Liming & Du, Lei & Sun, Helin, 2024. "Cross-regional integration of renewable energy and corporate carbon emissions: Evidence from China's cross-regional surplus renewable energy spot trading pilot," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Du, Minzhe & Wu, Fenger & Ye, Danfeng & Zhao, Yating & Liao, Liping, 2023. "Exploring the effects of energy quota trading policy on carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Zheng, Qingying & Hu, Haoyang & Li, Jianglong, 2024. "Enterprise decision-making in energy use rights trading market: A theoretical and simulation study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Mengyao Liu & Hongli Jiang, 2022. "Can the Energy-Consumption Permit Trading Scheme Curb SO 2 Emissions? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Qi He & Hongli Jiang, 2024. "Does the Energy-Consumption Permit Trading Scheme Improve Carbon Emission Performance? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Qu, Xinwei & Tian, Mingfu & Zhang, Linbo & Huang, Hongyun & Sun, Di & Song, Malin, 2025. "Energy structural change towards net-zero economy: What can we learn from carbon finance initiatives in China?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Zhang, Weijie & Yu, Yanni & Liu, Qingjun, 2024. "Is single or synergistic environmental permit trading system more effective? A study based on Chinese industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Wu, Xueping & Qiu, Wenhai, 2024. "Carbon decoupling effects of energy consumption permit trading schemes: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    12. Zhu Yongjie, 2023. "Enterprise life cycle, financial technology and digital transformation of banks—Evidence from China," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 486-500, September.
    13. Xiang Wu & Lindong Liu & Xiaowei Luo & Jianwu Chen & Jingwen Dai, 2018. "Study on Flow Field Characteristics of the 90° Rectangular Elbow in the Exhaust Hood of a Uniform Push–Pull Ventilation Device," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Nicole Grunewald & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2009. "Driving Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and the Impact from Kyoto Protocol," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 190, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
    15. Juan Antonio Duro & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla, 2017. "The Causal Factors of International Inequality in $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions Per Capita: A Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(4), pages 683-700, August.
    16. Saikku, Laura & Rautiainen, Aapo & Kauppi, Pekka E., 2008. "The sustainability challenge of meeting carbon dioxide targets in Europe by 2020," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 730-742, February.
    17. Jian Wang & Yuzhen Zhang & Angelina Kissiwaa Twum & Andrew Osei Agyemang, 2024. "Realizing sustainable development goals in sub‐Saharan Africa: The role of industrialization on consumption‐based carbon emission," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2666-2677, June.
    18. Duan, Yunlong & Liu, Shuling & Cheng, Hao & Chin, Tachia & Luo, Xuan, 2021. "The moderating effect of absorptive capacity on transnational knowledge spillover and the innovation quality of high-tech industries in host countries: Evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Yagi, Chihiro & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2024. "Electricity storage or transmission? Comparing social welfare between electricity arbitrages," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    20. Liddle, Brantley, 2013. "Population, Affluence, and Environmental Impact Across Development: Evidence from Panel Cointegration Modeling," MPRA Paper 52088, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:15:p:3860-:d:1450400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.