IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i13p3074-d1419797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen as a Storage Solution in an Integrated Energy System for an Industrial Area in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jincan Zeng

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Xiaoyu Liu

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Minwei Liu

    (Planning & Research Center for Power Grid, Yunnan Power Grid Corp., Kunming 650011, China)

  • Xi Liu

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Guori Huang

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Shangheng Yao

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Gengsheng He

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Nan Shang

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Fuqiang Guo

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
    School of Energy Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Peng Wang

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

Abstract

This study proposes four kinds of hybrid source–grid–storage systems consisting of photovoltaic and wind energy, and a power grid including different batteries and hydrogen storage systems for Sanjiao town. HOMER-PRO was applied for the optimal design and techno-economic analysis of each case, aiming to explore reproducible energy supply solutions for China’s industrial clusters. The results show that the proposed system is a fully feasible and reliable solution for industry-based towns, like Sanjiao, in their pursuit of carbon neutrality. In addition, the source-side price sensitivity analysis found that the hydrogen storage solution was cost-competitive only when the capital costs on the storage and source sides were reduced by about 70%. However, the hydrogen storage system had the lowest carbon emissions, about 14% lower than the battery ones. It was also found that power generation cost reduction had a more prominent effect on the whole system’s NPC and LCOE reduction. This suggests that policy support needs to continue to push for generation-side innovation and scaling up, while research on different energy storage types should be encouraged to serve the needs of different source–grid–load–storage systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jincan Zeng & Xiaoyu Liu & Minwei Liu & Xi Liu & Guori Huang & Shangheng Yao & Gengsheng He & Nan Shang & Fuqiang Guo & Peng Wang, 2024. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen as a Storage Solution in an Integrated Energy System for an Industrial Area in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3074-:d:1419797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdrahman Alsabry & Krzysztof Szymański & Bartosz Michalak, 2023. "Energy, Economic and Environmental Analysis of Alternative, High-Efficiency Sources of Heat and Energy for Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Order to Increase Energy Efficiency in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Karol Tucki & Olga Orynycz & Antoni Świć & Mateusz Mitoraj-Wojtanek, 2019. "The Development of Electromobility in Poland and EU States as a Tool for Management of CO 2 Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Ribó-Pérez, David & Herraiz-Cañete, Ángela & Alfonso-Solar, David & Vargas-Salgado, Carlos & Gómez-Navarro, Tomás, 2021. "Modelling biomass gasifiers in hybrid renewable energy microgrids; a complete procedure for enabling gasifiers simulation in HOMER," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 501-512.
    4. Zou, Hongyang & Du, Huibin & Brown, Marilyn A. & Mao, Guozhu, 2017. "Large-scale PV power generation in China: A grid parity and techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 256-268.
    5. Demirci, Alpaslan & Öztürk, Zafer & Tercan, Said Mirza, 2023. "Decision-making between hybrid renewable energy configurations and grid extension in rural areas for different climate zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    6. Amutha, W. Margaret & Rajini, V., 2016. "Cost benefit and technical analysis of rural electrification alternatives in southern India using HOMER," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 236-246.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mominul Islam, Shah Mohammad & Salema, Arshad Adam & Saleheen, Mohammed Zeehan & Lim, Joanne Mun Yee, 2022. "The influence of shifting the electric bus charging routine on the techno-economic performance of a solar-powered bus depot," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    2. Mayyas Alsalman & Vian Ahmed & Zied Bahroun & Sara Saboor, 2023. "An Economic Analysis of Solar Energy Generation Policies in the UAE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Taofeek Afolabi & Hooman Farzaneh, 2023. "Optimal Design and Operation of an Off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy System in Nigeria’s Rural Residential Area, Using Fuzzy Logic and Optimization Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-33, February.
    4. Muhammad Bilal Ali & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Mohammed A. Alghassab, 2023. "Decarbonizing Telecommunication Sector: Techno-Economic Assessment and Optimization of PV Integration in Base Transceiver Stations in Telecom Sector Spreading across Various Geographically Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-34, April.
    5. Hou, Guolian & Ke, Yin & Huang, Congzhi, 2021. "A flexible constant power generation scheme for photovoltaic system by error-based active disturbance rejection control and perturb & observe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Hernández-Escobedo, Q. & Fernández-García, A. & Manzano-Agugliaro, F., 2017. "Solar resource assessment for rural electrification and industrial development in the Yucatan Peninsula (Mexico)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1550-1561.
    7. Zhang, Yusheng & Ma, Chao & Yang, Yang & Pang, Xiulan & Lian, Jijian & Wang, Xin, 2022. "Capacity configuration and economic evaluation of a power system integrating hydropower, solar, and wind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Pei Juan Yew & Deepak Chaulagain & Noel Ngando Same & Jaebum Park & Jeong-Ok Lim & Jeung-Soo Huh, 2024. "Optimal Hybrid Renewable Energy System to Accelerate a Sustainable Energy Transition in Johor, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Aziz, Ali Saleh & Tajuddin, Mohammad Faridun Naim & Adzman, Mohd Rafi & Mohammed, Mohd Fayzul & Ramli, Makbul A.M., 2020. "Feasibility analysis of grid-connected and islanded operation of a solar PV microgrid system: A case study of Iraq," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Abdrahman Alsabry & Krzysztof Szymański, 2023. "Energy Analyses of Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Various Locations in Poland and Their Impact on the Number of Heating Degree Days," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2019. "Forecasting Methane Emissions from Hard Coal Mines Including the Methane Drainage Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Ajlan, Abdullah & Tan, Chee Wei & Abdilahi, Abdirahman Mohamed, 2017. "Assessment of environmental and economic perspectives for renewable-based hybrid power system in Yemen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 559-570.
    13. Xiaowen Ding & Lin Liu & Guohe Huang & Ye Xu & Junhong Guo, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for a Non-Traditional Energy System in Beijing under Climate Change Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Vishnupriyan, J. & Manoharan, P.S., 2018. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for renewable energy integration: A southern India focus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 474-488.
    15. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:28-39 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Oluwaseye Samson Adedoja & Damilola Elizabeth Babatunde & Olubayo Moses Babatunde, 2020. "Hybrid Power System for a Fuel Station Considering Temperature Coefficient," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 476-482.
    17. Vishnupriyan, J. & Manoharan, P.S., 2017. "Demand side management approach to rural electrification of different climate zones in Indian state of Tamil Nadu," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 799-815.
    18. Liping Ding & Fan Zhang & Jing Shuai, 2018. "How Do Chinese Residents Expect of Government Subsidies on Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation?—A Case of Wuhan, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    19. Kovárník Richard & Staňková Michaela, 2023. "Efficiency of the Automotive Industry in the Visegrad Group," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 12-23, January.
    20. David Borge-Diez & Pedro Miguel Ortega-Cabezas & Antonio Colmenar-Santos & Jorge Juan Blanes-Peiró, 2021. "Contribution of Driving Efficiency to Vehicle-to-Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-30, June.
    21. Farrell, C.C. & Osman, A.I. & Doherty, R. & Saad, M. & Zhang, X. & Murphy, A. & Harrison, J. & Vennard, A.S.M. & Kumaravel, V. & Al-Muhtaseb, A.H. & Rooney, D.W., 2020. "Technical challenges and opportunities in realising a circular economy for waste photovoltaic modules," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3074-:d:1419797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.