IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i8p3411-d1122326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Support for Defining Adaptive Façade Design Goals in the Early Design Phase

Author

Listed:
  • Michael P. Voigt

    (Institute for Engineering Design and Industrial Design, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Daniel Roth

    (Institute for Engineering Design and Industrial Design, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Matthias Kreimeyer

    (Institute for Engineering Design and Industrial Design, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Compared to conventional façades, adaptive façades (AFs) can adjust their properties in response to environmental changes and user requirements. Often performed through the integration of actuators, sensors, and control units, this provides benefits such as reduced energy consumption in buildings but also increases the complexity of the façade design. To efficiently deal with the higher complexity, this article aims to provide suitable decision support for the early design phase, identify suitable design goals, and compare these to previously implemented Afs (make-or-buy decision). There is particular focus on the AF-specific characteristics, as these are new compared to well-known conventional façades. To systematically develop decision support, requirements are identified in expert interviews and the literature, and the current state of the art is evaluated against these. Research gaps found in current methods are addressed in this article, and continuous decision support is developed for the early design phase of an integrated design process. This support includes a checklist with AF-specific characteristics and a digitally implemented database of AFs. Based on the requirements, an evaluation is performed for both methods: this includes the comparison of the results to three ongoing AF projects and the assignment of 40 case studies to the database.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael P. Voigt & Daniel Roth & Matthias Kreimeyer, 2023. "Decision Support for Defining Adaptive Façade Design Goals in the Early Design Phase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3411-:d:1122326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miren Juaristi & Thaleia Konstantinou & Tomás Gómez-Acebo & Aurora Monge-Barrio, 2020. "Development and Validation of a Roadmap to Assist the Performance-Based Early-Stage Design Process of Adaptive Opaque Facades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Zhang, Xingxing & Shen, Jingchun & Lu, Yan & He, Wei & Xu, Peng & Zhao, Xudong & Qiu, Zhongzhu & Zhu, Zishang & Zhou, Jinzhi & Dong, Xiaoqiang, 2015. "Active Solar Thermal Facades (ASTFs): From concept, application to research questions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 32-63.
    3. Nazgol Hafizi & Sadiye Mujdem Vural, 2022. "New Taxonomy of Climate Adaptive Building Shell Office Buildings: Focus on User–Façade Interaction Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Mohamad Kassem & Nashwan Dawood & Donald Mitchell, 2012. "A decision support system for the selection of curtain wall systems at the design development stage," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(12), pages 1039-1053, December.
    5. Pimmler, Thomas U. (Thomas Udo) & Eppinger, Steven D., 1994. "Integration analysis of product decompositions," Working papers 3690-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Alessandra Battisti & Sandra G. L. Persiani & Manuela Crespi, 2019. "Review and Mapping of Parameters for the Early Stage Design of Adaptive Building Technologies through Life Cycle Assessment Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-33, May.
    7. Joud Al Dakheel & Kheira Tabet Aoul, 2017. "Building Applications, Opportunities and Challenges of Active Shading Systems: A State-of-the-Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-32, October.
    8. Jutta Schade & Thomas Olofsson & Marcus Schreyer, 2011. "Decision-making in a model-based design process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 371-382.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jungwon Yoon & Sanghyun Bae, 2020. "Performance Evaluation and Design of Thermo-Responsive SMP Shading Prototypes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Karanafti, Aikaterina & Theodosiou, Theodoros & Tsikaloudaki, Katerina, 2022. "Assessment of buildings’ dynamic thermal insulation technologies-A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. Cristina Cornaro & Ludovica Renzi & Marco Pierro & Aldo Di Carlo & Alessandro Guglielmotti, 2018. "Thermal and Electrical Characterization of a Semi-Transparent Dye-Sensitized Photovoltaic Module under Real Operating Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Alan MacCormack & John Rusnak & Carliss Y. Baldwin, 2006. "Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1015-1030, July.
    5. Hanze Yu & Wei Yang & Qiyuan Li & Jie Li, 2022. "Optimizing Buildings’ Life Cycle Performance While Allowing Diversity in the Early Design Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Rostami, Sara & Afrand, Masoud & Shahsavar, Amin & Sheikholeslami, M. & Kalbasi, Rasool & Aghakhani, Saeed & Shadloo, Mostafa Safdari & Oztop, Hakan F., 2020. "A review of melting and freezing processes of PCM/nano-PCM and their application in energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Henning Skirde & Wolfgang Kersten & Meike Schröder, 2016. "Measuring the Cost Effects of Modular Product Architectures — A Conceptual Approach," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Staudenmayer, Nancy A. (Nancy Ann) & Cusumano, Michael A., 1954-, 1998. "Alternative designs for product component integration," Working papers WP 4016-98., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    9. Byungyun Lee, 2019. "Heating, Cooling, and Lighting Energy Demand Simulation Analysis of Kinetic Shading Devices with Automatic Dimming Control for Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Kartik Kalaignanam & Tarun Kushwaha & Anand Nair, 2017. "The Product Quality Impact of Aligning Buyer-Supplier Network Structure and Product Architecture: an Empirical Investigation in the Automobile Industry," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Cabigiosu, Anna & Zirpoli, Francesco & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2013. "Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 662-675.
    12. Tyson R. Browning, 1999. "Designing system development projects for organizational integration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 217-225.
    13. Rashmi Jain & Anithashree Chandrasekaran & Ozgur Erol, 2010. "A systems integration framework for process analysis and improvement," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 274-289, September.
    14. Jukrin Moon & Dongoo Lee & Taesik Lee & Jaemyung Ahn & Jindong Shin & Kyungho Yoon & Dongsik Choi, 2015. "Group Decision Procedure to Model the Dependency Structure of Complex Systems: Framework and Case Study for Critical Infrastructures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 323-338, July.
    15. Avner Engel & Tyson R. Browning, 2008. "Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 125-146, June.
    16. Tobias K.P. Holmqvist & Magnus L. Persson, 2003. "Analysis and improvement of product modularization methods: Their ability to deal with complex products," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 195-209.
    17. Buonomano, A. & Calise, F. & Cappiello, F.L. & Palombo, A. & Vicidomini, M., 2019. "Dynamic analysis of the integration of electric vehicles in efficient buildings fed by renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 31-50.
    18. Staudenmayer, Nancy A. (Nancy Ann), 1997. "Interdependency : conceptual, empirical, & practical issues," Working papers 162-97. Working paper (Sl, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    19. Fine, Charles H. & Whitney, Daniel E., 1996. "Is the make-buy decision process a core competence?," Working papers #140-96. Working paper (S, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    20. Ting-Kwei Wang & Qian Zhang & Heap-Yih Chong & Xiangyu Wang, 2017. "Integrated Supplier Selection Framework in a Resilient Construction Supply Chain: An Approach via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3411-:d:1122326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.