IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i8p3346-d1120063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy-Based Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Applied to Cyber-Power Grids

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés A. Zúñiga

    (IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • João F. P. Fernandes

    (IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Paulo J. C. Branco

    (IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) is a qualitative risk analysis method widely used in various industrial and service applications. Despite its popularity, the method suffers from several shortcomings analyzed in the literature over the years. The classical approach to obtain the failure modes’ risk level does not consider any relative importance between the risk factors and may not necessarily represent the real risk perception of the FMECA team members, usually expressed by natural language. This paper introduces the application of Type-I fuzzy inference systems (FIS) as an alternative to improve the failure modes’ risk level computation in the classic FMECA analysis and its use in cyber-power grids. Our fuzzy-based FMECA considers first a set of fuzzy variables defined by FMECA experts to embody the uncertainty associated with the human language. Second, the “seven plus or minus two” criterion is used to set the number of fuzzy sets to each variable, forming a rule base consisting of 125 fuzzy rules to represent the risk perception of the experts. In the electrical power systems framework, the new fuzzy-based FMECA is utilized for reliability analysis of cyber-power grid systems, assessing its benefits relative to a classic FMECA. The paper provides the following three key contributions: (1) representing the uncertainty associated with the FMECA experts using fuzzy sets, (2) representing the FMECA experts’ reasoning and risk perception through fuzzy-rule-based reasoning, and (3) applying the proposed fuzzy approach, which is a promissory method to accurately define the prioritization of failure modes in the context of reliability analysis of cyber-power grid systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés A. Zúñiga & João F. P. Fernandes & Paulo J. C. Branco, 2023. "Fuzzy-Based Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Applied to Cyber-Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-34, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3346-:d:1120063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3346/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3346/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Jia & You, Jian-Xin & Liu, Hu-Chen & Song, Ming-Shun, 2020. "Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Sheng Liu & Xiaojie Guo & Lanyong Zhang, 2019. "An Improved Assessment Method for FMEA for a Shipboard Integrated Electric Propulsion System Using Fuzzy Logic and DEMATEL Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Andrés A. Zúñiga & Alexandre Baleia & João Fernandes & Paulo Jose Da Costa Branco, 2020. "Classical Failure Modes and Effects Analysis in the Context of Smart Grid Cyber-Physical Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Sajjad Bahrebar & Frede Blaabjerg & Huai Wang & Navid Vafamand & Mohammad-Hassan Khooban & Sima Rastayesh & Dao Zhou, 2018. "A Novel Type-2 Fuzzy Logic for Improved Risk Analysis of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells in Marine Power Systems Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais & José Torres Farinha, 2022. "Sustainable Food Production: An Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Framework for Analyzing the Risk of Critical Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna Fabis-Domagala & Mariusz Domagala & Hassan Momeni, 2021. "A Matrix FMEA Analysis of Variable Delivery Vane Pumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Ferenc Bognár & Csaba Hegedűs, 2022. "Analysis and Consequences on Some Aggregation Functions of PRISM (Partial Risk Map) Risk Assessment Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Li, Ying & Liu, Peide & Li, Gang, 2023. "An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Failure mode and effect analysis considering the fairness-oriented consensus of a large group with core-periphery structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    6. Yuan, Zixia & Xiong, Guojiang & Fu, Xiaofan & Mohamed, Ali Wagdy, 2023. "Improving fault tolerance in diagnosing power system failures with optimal hierarchical extreme learning machine," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Mohammad Hassan Khooban & Navid Vafamand & Jalil Boudjadar, 2019. "Tracking Control for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Systems in Zero-Emission Ferry Ships," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-9, November.
    8. Michael Felix Pacevicius & Marilia Ramos & Davide Roverso & Christian Thun Eriksen & Nicola Paltrinieri, 2022. "Managing Heterogeneous Datasets for Dynamic Risk Analysis of Large-Scale Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, April.
    9. Ranka Gojković & Goran Đurić & Danijela Tadić & Snežana Nestić & Aleksandar Aleksić, 2021. "Evaluation and Selection of the Quality Methods for Manufacturing Process Reliability Improvement—Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Genetic Algorithm Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Fu-Cheng Wang & Kuang-Ming Lin, 2018. "Impacts of Load Profiles on the Optimization of Power Management of a Green Building Employing Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Jung, Sejin & Yoo, Junbeom & Lee, Young-Jun, 2020. "A practical application of NUREG/CR-6430 software safety hazard analysis to FPGA software," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. Mingyue Shi & Rong Jiang & Xiaohan Hu & Jingwei Shang, 2020. "A privacy protection method for health care big data management based on risk access control," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 427-442, September.
    13. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Mohamed Derbeli & Oscar Barambones & Jose Antonio Ramos-Hernanz & Lassaad Sbita, 2019. "Real-Time Implementation of a Super Twisting Algorithm for PEM Fuel Cell Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Li, He & Diaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2021. "A developed failure mode and effect analysis for floating offshore wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 133-145.
    16. Dhalmahapatra, Krantiraditya & Garg, Ashish & Singh, Kritika & Xavier, Nirmal Francis & Maiti, J., 2022. "An integrated RFUCOM – RTOPSIS approach for failure modes and effects analysis: A case of manufacturing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    17. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. Li, Wanhong & Liu, Guangzhong, 2022. "Dynamic failure mode analysis approach based on an improved Taguchi process capability index," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    19. Kai Pan & Hui Liu & Xiaoqing Gou & Rui Huang & Dong Ye & Haining Wang & Adam Glowacz & Jie Kong, 2022. "Towards a Systematic Description of Fault Tree Analysis Studies Using Informetric Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Mohammed Yousri Silaa & Mohamed Derbeli & Oscar Barambones & Ali Cheknane, 2020. "Design and Implementation of High Order Sliding Mode Control for PEMFC Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3346-:d:1120063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.