IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2239-d1080480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of an Energy Policy for the Decarbonisation of Residential and Service Buildings in Northern Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Capelo

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Tiago Soares

    (Center for Power and Energy Systems, Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Isabel Azevedo

    (Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (INEGI), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Wellington Fonseca

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Power and Energy Systems, Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Manuel A. Matos

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Power and Energy Systems, Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The decarbonisation of the building sector is crucial for Portugal’s goal of achieving economy-wide carbon neutrality by 2050. To mobilize communities towards energy efficiency measures, it is important to understand the primary drivers and barriers that must be overcome through policymaking. This paper aims to review existing Energy Policies and Actions (EPA) in Portugal and assess their effectiveness in improving Energy Efficiency (EE) and reducing CO 2 emissions in the building sector. The Local Energy Planning Assistant (LEPA) tool was used to model, test, validate and compare the implementation of current and alternative EPAs in the North of Portugal, including the national EE plan. The results indicate that electrification of heating and cooling, EE measures, and the proliferation of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) are crucial for achieving climate neutrality. The study found that the modelling of alternative EPAs can be improved to reduce investment costs and increase Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction. Among the alternatives assessed, the proposed one (Alternative 4) presents the best returns on investment in terms of cost savings and emissions reduction. It allows for 52% investment cost savings in the residential sector and 13% in the service sector when compared to the current national roadmap to carbon neutrality (Alternative 2). The estimated emission reduction in 2050 for Alternative 4 is 0.64% for the residential sector and 3.2% for the service sector when compared to Alternative 2.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Capelo & Tiago Soares & Isabel Azevedo & Wellington Fonseca & Manuel A. Matos, 2023. "Design of an Energy Policy for the Decarbonisation of Residential and Service Buildings in Northern Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2239-:d:1080480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koengkan, Matheus & Fuinhas, José Alberto & Osmani, Fariba & Kazemzadeh, Emad & Auza, Anna & Alavijeh, Nooshin Karimi & Teixeira, Mônica, 2022. "Do financial and fiscal incentive policies increase the energy efficiency ratings in residential properties? A piece of empirical evidence from Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Economidou, M. & Ringel, M. & Valentova, M. & Castellazzi, L. & Zancanella, P. & Zangheri, P. & Serrenho, T. & Paci, D. & Bertoldi, P., 2022. "Strategic energy and climate policy planning: Lessons learned from European energy efficiency policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Graça Gomes, João & Medeiros Pinto, José & Xu, Huijin & Zhao, Changying & Hashim, Haslenda, 2020. "Modeling and planning of the electricity energy system with a high share of renewable supply for Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Bomberg, Elizabeth & McEwen, Nicola, 2012. "Mobilizing community energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 435-444.
    5. Blesl, Markus & Kober, Tom & Bruchof, David & Kuder, Ralf, 2010. "Effects of climate and energy policy related measures and targets on the future structure of the European energy system in 2020 and beyond," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6278-6292, October.
    6. María Herrando & Antonio Gómez & Norberto Fueyo, 2022. "Supporting Local Authorities to Plan Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings: From Local Needs to Regional Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Yujie Xu & Vivian Loftness & Edson Severnini, 2021. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Retrofit Effects for a Commercial Building Portfolio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Ferreira, Joaquim & Pinheiro, Manuel, 2011. "In search of better energy performance in the Portuguese buildings—The case of the Portuguese regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7666-7683.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Noro & Filippo Busato, 2023. "Energy Saving, Energy Efficiency or Renewable Energy: Which Is Better for the Decarbonization of the Residential Sector in Italy?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Bauwens, Thomas, 2019. "Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 841-852.
    3. António Figueiredo & Filipe Rebelo & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Rui Oliveira & Sérgio Lousada & Romeu Vicente & Victor M. Ferreira, 2020. "Implementation and Challenges of the Passive House Concept in Portugal: Lessons Learnt from Successful Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Wang, Jianjun & Liu, Fang & Li, Li & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "More than innovativeness: Comparing residents’ motivations for participating renewable energy communities in different innovation segments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 552-563.
    5. Moroni, Stefano & Antoniucci, Valentina & Bisello, Adriano, 2016. "Energy sprawl, land taking and distributed generation: towards a multi-layered density," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 266-273.
    6. Klein, Sharon J.W. & Coffey, Stephanie, 2016. "Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 867-880.
    7. Jiamin Lu & Nishan Chen & Xin Feng, 2023. "Competitive Analysis of the Online Leasing Problem for Scarce Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Pons-Seres de Brauwer, C. & Cohen, J.J., 2020. "Analysing the potential of citizen-financed community renewable energy to drive Europe's low-carbon energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Okkonen, Lasse & Lehtonen, Olli, 2016. "Socio-economic impacts of community wind power projects in Northern Scotland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 826-833.
    10. Salm, Sarah & Hille, Stefanie Lena & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2016. "What are retail investors' risk-return preferences towards renewable energy projects? A choice experiment in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 310-320.
    11. Sara Brito-Coimbra & Daniel Aelenei & Maria Gloria Gomes & Antonio Moret Rodrigues, 2021. "Building Façade Retrofit with Solar Passive Technologies: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando & Cabaço, António, 2015. "A Portuguese approach to define reference buildings for cost-optimal methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 316-328.
    13. Magdalena Jaciow & Edyta Rudawska & Adam Sagan & Jolanta Tkaczyk & Robert Wolny, 2022. "The Influence of Environmental Awareness on Responsible Energy Consumption—The Case of Households in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    15. Lorenzo De Vidovich & Luca Tricarico & Matteo Zulianello, 2023. "How Can We Frame Energy Communities’ Organisational Models? Insights from the Research ‘Community Energy Map’ in the Italian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu & Siyami Alp Limoncuoglu & Muhittin Hakan Demir & Johannes Reichl & Katrin Burgstaller & Alessandro Sciullo & Edoardo Ferrero, 2021. "Legal Provisions and Market Conditions for Energy Communities in Austria, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Turkey: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Lidia Luty & Monika Zioło & Wioletta Knapik & Iwona Bąk & Karol Kukuła, 2023. "Energy Security in Light of Sustainable Development Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Di Leo, Senatro & Cosmi, Carmelina & Ragosta, Maria, 2015. "An application of multivariate statistical techniques to partial equilibrium models outputs: The analysis of the NEEDS-TIMES Pan European model results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 108-120.
    19. Bompard, Ettore & Ciocia, Alessandro & Grosso, Daniele & Huang, Tao & Spertino, Filippo & Jafari, Mehdi & Botterud, Audun, 2022. "Assessing the role of fluctuating renewables in energy transition: Methodologies and tools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    20. Christina E. Hoicka & Jessica Conroy & Anna Berka, 2021. "Reconfiguring actors and infrastructure in city renewable energy transitions: a regional perspective," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(06), GEIST Working Paper Series.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2239-:d:1080480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.