IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p8761-d432782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation and Challenges of the Passive House Concept in Portugal: Lessons Learnt from Successful Experience

Author

Listed:
  • António Figueiredo

    (RISCO—Civil Engineering Department of University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Filipe Rebelo

    (RISCO—Civil Engineering Department of University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Rui Alexandre Castanho

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
    VALORIZA—Research Centre for Endogenous Resource Valorization, 7300-110 Portalegre, Portugal
    Institute of Research on Territorial Governance and Inter-Organizational Cooperation, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
    Environmental Resources Analysis Research Group (ARAM), University of Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain)

  • Rui Oliveira

    (RISCO—Civil Engineering Department of University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Sérgio Lousada

    (VALORIZA—Research Centre for Endogenous Resource Valorization, 7300-110 Portalegre, Portugal
    Institute of Research on Territorial Governance and Inter-Organizational Cooperation, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
    CITUR—Madeira—Centre for Tourism Research, Development and Innovation, 9000-082 Madeira, Portugal
    Faculty of Exact Sciences and Engineering (FCEE), Department of Civil Engineering and Geology (DECG), University of Madeira (UMa), 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal)

  • Romeu Vicente

    (RISCO—Civil Engineering Department of University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Victor M. Ferreira

    (RISCO—Civil Engineering Department of University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

The European Green Deal defined by the European Commission on December 2019 presents an ambitious set of measures for the European Union and its citizens to accomplish the challenge of climate change, making Europe until 2050 the first neutral continent, where there are no net emissions of greenhouse gases. The Passive House (PH) concept has the same ambitious goal, targeting the reduction of the carbon footprint while promoting a construction design that gives primacy to the optimum energy balance, assuring comfort and quality with a minimum impact on the final building cost and operation. However, the PH concept is still not an easy process to implement in the traditional construction sector, especially in South European territory, as is the case of Portugal. Contextually, the present study through the discussion of a case study research method applied to European PH successful experience, has defined guidelines for the implementation of this concept within sustainable development principles. The methodology strategy starts with the information collection from Hanover, Brussels, and Tyrol case studies. Then, a statement regarding the current situation of Portugal in respect of the PH numbers and policies was performed. Moreover, the information gathered, as well as the experience of learnt lessons, were compared to the Portuguese reality. As a final procedure, barriers and obstacles for the Portuguese case have been identified through the analysis and understanding of the country’s social dynamics, and also with the crossing of sustainable development principles. Thus, the present research enables us to propose guidelines to increase the PH implementation in Portugal.

Suggested Citation

  • António Figueiredo & Filipe Rebelo & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Rui Oliveira & Sérgio Lousada & Romeu Vicente & Victor M. Ferreira, 2020. "Implementation and Challenges of the Passive House Concept in Portugal: Lessons Learnt from Successful Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8761-:d:432782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Faure, Corinne, 2019. "Exploring the diffusion of low-energy houses: An empirical study in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1382-1393.
    2. Müller, Liana & Berker, Thomas, 2013. "Passive House at the crossroads: The past and the present of a voluntary standard that managed to bridge the energy efficiency gap," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 586-593.
    3. Rui Oliveira & António Figueiredo & Romeu Vicente & Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida, 2018. "Multi-Objective Optimisation of the Energy Performance of Lightweight Constructions Combining Evolutionary Algorithms and Life Cycle Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Rui Alexandre Castanho & José Manuel Naranjo Gómez & Joanna Kurowska-Pysz, 2019. "How to Reach the Eurocities? A Retrospective Review of the Evolution Dynamics of Urban Planning and Management on the Iberian Peninsula Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Ferreira, Joaquim & Pinheiro, Manuel, 2011. "In search of better energy performance in the Portuguese buildings—The case of the Portuguese regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7666-7683.
    6. Paolo Zangheri & Marina Economidou & Nicola Labanca, 2019. "Progress in the Implementation of the EU Energy Efficiency Directive through the Lens of the National Annual Reports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ünal, Berat Berkan & Onaygil, Sermin & Acuner, Ebru & Cin, Rabia, 2022. "Application of energy efficiency obligation scheme for electricity distribution companies in Turkey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Faure, Corinne & Schleich, Joachim, 2020. "Poor energy ratings when appliances convey?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Schleich, Joachim & Faure, Corinne & Meissner, Thomas, 2021. "Adoption of retrofit measures among homeowners in EU countries: The effects of access to capital and debt aversion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Sara Brito-Coimbra & Daniel Aelenei & Maria Gloria Gomes & Antonio Moret Rodrigues, 2021. "Building Façade Retrofit with Solar Passive Technologies: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando & Cabaço, António, 2015. "A Portuguese approach to define reference buildings for cost-optimal methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 316-328.
    6. Giacomo Di Foggia & Massimo Beccarello & Marco Borgarello & Francesca Bazzocchi & Stefano Moscarelli, 2022. "Market-Based Instruments to Promote Energy Efficiency: Insights from the Italian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Nayara R. M. Sakiyama & Joyce C. Carlo & Leonardo Mazzaferro & Harald Garrecht, 2021. "Building Optimization through a Parametric Design Platform: Using Sensitivity Analysis to Improve a Radial-Based Algorithm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Faure, Corinne, 2019. "Exploring the diffusion of low-energy houses: An empirical study in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1382-1393.
    9. Jan Suchacek, 2019. "The Benefit of Failure: On the Development of Ostrava’s Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Thomas Adisorn & Lena Tholen & Johannes Thema & Hauke Luetkehaus & Sibylle Braungardt & Katja Huenecke & Katja Schumacher, 2020. "Towards a More Realistic Cost–Benefit Analysis—Attempting to Integrate Transaction Costs and Energy Efficiency Services," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Michal Gluszak & Agnieszka Malkowska & Bartłomiej Marona, 2021. "Green Building Adoption on Office Markets in Europe: An Empirical Investigation into LEED Certification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Mengqi Zhao & Xiaoling Wang & Jia Yu & Lei Bi & Yao Xiao & Jun Zhang, 2020. "Optimization of Construction Duration and Schedule Robustness Based on Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer with Sine Cosine Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Barbara Kryk & Małgorzata Klaudia Guzowska, 2021. "Implementation of Climate/Energy Targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy by the EU Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    15. José D. Silvestre & André M. P. Castelo & José J. B. C. Silva & Jorge M. C. L. de Brito & Manuel D. Pinheiro, 2019. "Energy Retrofitting of a Buildings’ Envelope: Assessment of the Environmental, Economic and Energy (3E) Performance of a Cork-Based Thermal Insulating Rendering Mortar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Diaz de Garayo, S. & Martínez, A. & Astrain, D., 2022. "Optimal combination of an air-to-air thermoelectric heat pump with a heat recovery system to HVAC a passive house dwelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    17. Marta Gangolells & Miquel Casals & Marcel Macarulla & Núria Forcada, 2021. "Exploring the Potential of a Gamified Approach to Reduce Energy Use and Carbon Emissions in the Household Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Saadatian, Omidreza & Sopian, K. & Lim, C.H. & Asim, Nilofar & Sulaiman, M.Y., 2012. "Trombe walls: A review of opportunities and challenges in research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6340-6351.
    19. Dalbem, Renata & Grala da Cunha, Eduardo & Vicente, Romeu & Figueiredo, Antonio & Oliveira, Rui & Silva, Antonio César Silveira Baptista da, 2019. "Optimisation of a social housing for south of Brazil: From basic performance standard to passive house concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1278-1296.
    20. Krzysztof Grygierek & Joanna Ferdyn-Grygierek & Anna Gumińska & Łukasz Baran & Magdalena Barwa & Kamila Czerw & Paulina Gowik & Klaudia Makselan & Klaudia Potyka & Agnes Psikuta, 2020. "Energy and Environmental Analysis of Single-Family Houses Located in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8761-:d:432782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.