IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i2p572-d1024343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Leak Detection Method Based on the Disturbance-Reflected Signal

Author

Listed:
  • Dongsheng Guo

    (College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Huadong), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Zhaoxue Cui

    (Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710018, China)

  • Cuiwei Liu

    (College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Huadong), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Yuxing Li

    (College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Huadong), Qingdao 266580, China)

Abstract

Leak detection technology, based on the disturbance-reflected signal, can realize pipeline state inspection without relying on the transient characteristics of leakage. However, the lack of research on the factors affecting the detection effect of this method greatly restricts its popularization and application. Therefore, this paper realizes the valve opening and closing through dynamic mesh technology and further establishes a 2D pipeline disturbance and reflection signal detection model. The correctness of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model detection mechanism was verified by theoretical analysis and indoor pipe flow experiments. In this process, it was found that reflections from boundaries, such as the pipe end, could also be identified and did not interfere with leak-related signals. In addition, the positioning errors of the leakage hole and the pipe end were 4.447% and 0.121%, respectively, and accurate positioning with zero error was able to be achieved in the calculation results of the CFD model. Finally, the influence factors of the detection effect of this method were analyzed by inputting the determined disturbance signal. Both the disturbance signal characteristics and the leakage hole characteristics affected the reflected signal, and the former played a more prominent role. Surprisingly, the results showed that pipeline flow and pressure had very limited influence on this method.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongsheng Guo & Zhaoxue Cui & Cuiwei Liu & Yuxing Li, 2023. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Leak Detection Method Based on the Disturbance-Reflected Signal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:572-:d:1024343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Meniconi & Bruno Brunone & Marco Ferrante & Christian Massari, 2011. "Small Amplitude Sharp Pressure Waves to Diagnose Pipe Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 79-96, January.
    2. Liu, Aihua & Chen, Ke & Huang, Xiaofei & Li, Didi & Zhang, Xiaochun, 2021. "Dynamic risk assessment model of buried gas pipelines based on system dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Xiang, W. & Zhou, W., 2021. "Bayesian network model for predicting probability of third-party damage to underground pipelines and learning model parameters from incomplete datasets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Ruiz-Tagle, Andres & Lewis, Austin D. & Schell, Colin A. & Lever, Ernest & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "BaNTERA: A Bayesian Network for Third-Party Excavation Risk Assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Wu, Xingguang & Huang, Huirong & Xie, Jianyu & Lu, Meixing & Wang, Shaobo & Li, Wang & Huang, Yixuan & Yu, Weichao & Sun, Xiaobo, 2023. "A novel dynamic risk assessment method for the petrochemical industry using bow-tie analysis and Bayesian network analysis method based on the methodological framework of ARAMIS project," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Hassan, Shamsu & Wang, Jin & Kontovas, Christos & Bashir, Musa, 2022. "An assessment of causes and failure likelihood of cross-country pipelines under uncertainty using bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    5. Lin Wang & Yuping Xing, 2022. "Risk Assessment of a Coupled Natural Gas and Electricity Market Considering Dual Interactions: A System Dynamics Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Hendalianpour, Ayad & Liu, Peide & Amirghodsi, Sirous & Hamzehlou, Mohammad, 2022. "Designing a System Dynamics model to simulate criteria affecting oil and gas development contracts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Wang, Chang & Zheng, Jianqin & Liang, Yongtu & Wang, Bohong & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Zhu, Zhu & Liao, Qi, 2022. "Deeppipe: An intelligent monitoring framework for operating condition of multi-product pipelines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    8. Wang, WuChang & Zhang, Yi & Li, YuXing & Hu, Qihui & Liu, Chengsong & Liu, Cuiwei, 2022. "Vulnerability analysis method based on risk assessment for gas transmission capabilities of natural gas pipeline networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    9. Amaya-Gómez, Rafael & Schoefs, Franck & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Muñoz, Felipe & Bastidas-Arteaga, Emilio, 2022. "Matching of corroded defects in onshore pipelines based on In-Line Inspections and Voronoi partitions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Feng, Jian Rui & Yu, Guanghui & Zhao, Mengke & Zhang, Jiaqing & Lu, Shouxiang, 2022. "Dynamic risk assessment framework for industrial systems based on accidents chain theory: The case study of fire and explosion risk of UHV converter transformer," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Ali Haghighi & Helena Ramos, 2012. "Detection of Leakage Freshwater and Friction Factor Calibration in Drinking Networks Using Central Force Optimization," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2347-2363, June.
    12. Moradi, Ramin & Cofre-Martel, Sergio & Lopez Droguett, Enrique & Modarres, Mohammad & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "Integration of deep learning and Bayesian networks for condition and operation risk monitoring of complex engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Chen, Yinuo & Xie, Shuyi & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "Risk assessment of buried gas pipelines based on improved cloud-variable weight theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Huan-Feng Duan, 2015. "Uncertainty Analysis of Transient Flow Modeling and Transient-Based Leak Detection in Elastic Water Pipeline Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(14), pages 5413-5427, November.
    15. Suranji Rathnayaka & Benjamin Shannon & Pathmanathan Rajeev & Jayantha Kodikara, 2016. "Monitoring of Pressure Transients in Water Supply Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(2), pages 471-485, January.
    16. Chi Zhang & Martin F. Lambert & Jinzhe Gong & Aaron C. Zecchin & Angus R. Simpson & Mark L. Stephens, 2020. "Bayesian Inverse Transient Analysis for Pipeline Condition Assessment: Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 2807-2820, July.
    17. Aorui Bi & Shuya Huang & Xinguo Sun, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Oil and Gas Pipeline Based on Vague Set-Weighted Set Pair Analysis Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Xiao, Rui & Zayed, Tarek & Meguid, Mohamed A. & Sushama, Laxmi, 2024. "Improving failure modeling for gas transmission pipelines: A survival analysis and machine learning integrated approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    19. Suranji Rathnayaka & Benjamin Shannon & Pathmanathan Rajeev & Jayantha Kodikara, 2016. "Monitoring of Pressure Transients in Water Supply Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(2), pages 471-485, January.
    20. Marco Ferrante & Silvia Meniconi & Bruno Brunone, 2014. "Local and Global Leak Laws," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(11), pages 3761-3782, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:572-:d:1024343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.