IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p7980-d1296908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Technology to Support Alternative Fuels for Agriculture in the Context of Effective Solid Waste Management in the Jabodetabek Area, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Achirul Nanda

    (Department of Agricultural and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Wahyu Sugandi

    (Department of Agricultural and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Arif Kurnia Wijayanto

    (Division of Environmental Analysis and Geospatial Modeling, Department of Forest Resources Conservation and Eco-tourism, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
    Environmental Research Center, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
    Center for Environmental Remote Sensing (CeRES), Chiba University, Inage, Chiba 263-8522, Japan)

  • Harry Imantho

    (Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Arya Sutawijaya

    (Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Leopold Oscar Nelwan

    (Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • I Wayan Budiastra

    (Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Kudang Boro Seminar

    (Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

Abstract

Jabodetabek has been termed Indonesia’s most populous urban area, and it is predicted to generate around 9.069 million tons/year by 2023. On the other hand, this area has promising agricultural prospects and requires a great deal of energy. Tractors, generators, and other agricultural equipment are necessary to increase productivity. Therefore, it can potentially convert waste into energy as an effective alternative fuel for agriculture. This study looked at ways to recover the waste to energy (WtE) with various technologies (incineration, gasification, pyrolysis, landfilling, and anaerobic digestion). The assessment indicators focus on the type of waste, energy production efficiency, energy produced, technological readiness, capacity, byproducts, costs, air pollution, water pollution, and soil pollution. Each WtE technology is assessed using a scale between 1 (worst) and 5 (best) on each performance indicator concerning related references. Based on the analysis, the anaerobic digester is the most attractive WtE technology to generate an alternative fuel for agriculture in the Jabodetabek area. This is an environmentally friendly and economical technology because the technology readiness level is relatively mature. Thus, this review will assist policymakers and implementing authorities in determining the potential of the right WtE technologies for effective alternative fuel generation for agriculture, particularly in the metropolitan region of Jabodetabek.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Achirul Nanda & Wahyu Sugandi & Arif Kurnia Wijayanto & Harry Imantho & Arya Sutawijaya & Leopold Oscar Nelwan & I Wayan Budiastra & Kudang Boro Seminar, 2023. "The Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Technology to Support Alternative Fuels for Agriculture in the Context of Effective Solid Waste Management in the Jabodetabek Area, Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7980-:d:1296908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7980/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7980/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammadi, Ali & Omid, Mahmoud, 2010. "Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 191-196, January.
    2. Mikkola, Hannu J. & Ahokas, Jukka, 2010. "Indirect energy input of agricultural machinery in bioenergy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 23-28.
    3. Jean-François Perrot & Alison Subiantoro, 2018. "Municipal Waste Management Strategy Review and Waste-to-Energy Potentials in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Mohammadi, Ali & Rafiee, Shahin & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Rafiee, Hamed, 2010. "Energy inputs – yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 1071-1075.
    5. Clark P. Bishop & C. Richard Shumway & Philip R. Wandschneider, 2010. "Agent Heterogeneity in Adoption of Anaerobic Digestion Technology: Integrating Economic, Diffusion, and Behavioral Innovation Theories," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 86(3).
    6. Ley, Eduardo & Macauley, Molly K. & Salant, Stephen W., 2002. "Spatially and Intertemporally Efficient Waste Management: The Costs of Interstate Trade Restrictions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 188-218, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghatrehsamani, Shirin & Ebrahimi, Rahim & Kazi, Salim Newaz & Badarudin Badry, Ahmad & Sadeghinezhad, Emad, 2016. "Optimization model of peach production relevant to input energies – Yield function in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 315-321.
    2. Plappally, A.K. & Lienhard V, J.H., 2012. "Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end use, reclamation, and disposal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4818-4848.
    3. Mohammadi, Ali & Rafiee, Shahin & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Mousavi Avval, Seyed Hashem & Rafiee, Hamed, 2011. "Energy efficiency improvement and input cost saving in kiwifruit production using Data Envelopment Analysis approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2573-2579.
    4. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2013. "Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 7-12.
    5. Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska & Paweł Wiśniewski, 2022. "Investigation of Energy and Economic Balance and GHG Emissions in the Production of Different Cultivars of Buckwheat ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench): A Case Study in Northeastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. M.R. Jadidi & M.S. Sabuni & M. Homayounifar & A. Mohammadi, 2012. "Assessment of energy use pattern for tomato production in Iran: A case study from the Marand region," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 50-56.
    7. Elsoragaby, Suha & Yahya, Azmi & Mahadi, Muhammad Razif & Nawi, Nazmi Mat & Mairghany, Modather, 2019. "Energy utilization in major crop cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1285-1303.
    8. Yeşim Aytop, 2023. "Determination of Energy Consumption and Technical Efficiency of Cotton Farms in Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Hemmati, Abolfazl & Tabatabaeefar, Ahmad & Rajabipour, Ali, 2013. "Comparison of energy flow and economic performance between flat land and sloping land olive orchards," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 472-478.
    10. Morteza Zangeneh & Narges Banaeian & Sean Clark, 2021. "Meta-Analysis on Energy-Use Patterns of Cropping Systems in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Ramedani, Z. & Rafiee, S. & Heidari, M.D., 2011. "An investigation on energy consumption and sensitivity analysis of soybean production farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6340-6344.
    12. Rafiee, Shahin & Mousavi Avval, Seyed Hashem & Mohammadi, Ali, 2010. "Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3301-3306.
    13. Taghavifar, Hamid & Mardani, Aref, 2015. "Energy consumption analysis of wheat production in West Azarbayjan utilizing life cycle assessment (LCA)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 208-213.
    14. Soltani, Shiva & Mosavi, Seyed Habibollah & Saghaian, Sayed H. & Azhdari, Somayeh & Alamdarlo, Hamed N. & Khalilian, Sadegh, 2023. "Climate change and energy use efficiency in arid and semiarid agricultural areas: A case study of Hamadan-Bahar plain in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    15. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    16. Yongqiang Zhang & Hao Sun & Maosheng Ge & Hang Zhao & Yifan Hu & Changyue Cui & Zhibin Wu, 2023. "Difference in Energy Input and Output in Agricultural Production under Surface Irrigation and Water-Saving Irrigation: A Case Study of Kiwi Fruit in Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Mardani, Aref & Taghavifar, Hamid, 2016. "An overview on energy inputs and environmental emissions of grape production in West Azerbayjan of Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 918-924.
    18. Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Mondani, Farzad & Riahinia, Shahram, 2012. "Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of sugar beet production system in Iran: A case study in Khorasan Razavi province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1078-1084.
    19. Zhai, Jihua & Burke, Ian T. & Stewart, Douglas I., 2021. "Beneficial management of biomass combustion ashes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7980-:d:1296908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.