IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7525-d1278066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power Side Risk Assessment of Multi-Energy Microgrids Considering Risk Propagation between Interconnected Energy Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Ma

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Yumin Chen

    (Power Internet of Things Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, State Grid Sichuan Electric Power Research Institute, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Zhengwei Chang

    (Power Internet of Things Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, State Grid Sichuan Electric Power Research Institute, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Qian Li

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Hongli Liu

    (Power Internet of Things Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, State Grid Sichuan Electric Power Research Institute, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Yang Wei

    (Power Internet of Things Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, State Grid Sichuan Electric Power Research Institute, Chengdu 610041, China)

Abstract

Traditional power systems only contain a single energy type, namely, electrical energy, and involve no interaction with other networks with different energy types, such as gas networks and heat networks. With the rapid development of the Energy Internet, the coupling between various energy types has become increasingly tight, making traditional risk assessment methods no longer suitable for multi-energy microgrids. To this end, this paper proposes a microgrid risk assessment method that considers the impact of multiple interconnected networks with different energy types. First, respectively from the equipment and system levels, a risk transfer integrated energy conversion model is built, depicting the output of equipment under risk conditions and describing the process of risk transfer using energy coupling equipment in the microgrid. Thereafter, from the perspective of the energy flow distribution and considering the microgrid grid energy flow characteristics, a microgrid energy flow distribution model is built, based on which a microgrid risk analysis model that simulates the microgrid risk propagation mechanism is established by introducing risk factors that characterize equipment risk statuses. In addition, based on the system structure and the operational characteristics, a microgrid-oriented risk assessment process is designed. Finally, a numerical simulation confirms that considering the impact of multiple different energy networks to the power side in the risk assessment is necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Ma & Yumin Chen & Zhengwei Chang & Qian Li & Hongli Liu & Yang Wei, 2023. "Power Side Risk Assessment of Multi-Energy Microgrids Considering Risk Propagation between Interconnected Energy Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7525-:d:1278066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Wang & Yuping Xing, 2022. "Risk Assessment of a Coupled Natural Gas and Electricity Market Considering Dual Interactions: A System Dynamics Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Luo, Jianing & Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2022. "A quantitative reliability assessment and risk quantification method for microgrids considering supply and demand uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Liang, Weikun & Lin, Shunjiang & Liu, Mingbo & Sheng, Xuan & Pan, Yue & Liu, Yun, 2023. "Risk assessment for cascading failures in regional integrated energy system considering the pipeline dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Jingjing & Zhang, Huan & Wang, Yaran & Zhu, Zhaozhe & Bai, He & Li, Qicheng & Zheng, Lijun & Gao, Xinyong & You, Shijun, 2023. "Difference analysis and recognition of hydraulic oscillation by two types of sudden faults on long-distance district heating pipeline," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Labiba Noshin Asha & Ying Huang & Nita Yodo & Haitao Liao, 2023. "A Quantitative Approach of Measuring Sustainability Risk in Pipeline Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Niu, Jide & Li, Xiaoyuan & Tian, Zhe & Yang, Hongxing, 2023. "A framework for quantifying the value of information to mitigate risk in the optimal design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    4. Priyom Das & S. M. Mezbahul Amin & Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & Shabana Urooj & Ratil H. Ashique & Ahmed Al Mansur & Md. Tariqul Islam, 2023. "Assessment of Barriers to Wind Energy Development Using Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1, November.
    5. Liu, Zeyu & Li, Hang & Hou, Kai & Xu, Xiandong & Jia, Hongjie & Zhu, Lewei & Mu, Yunfei, 2023. "Risk assessment and alleviation of regional integrated energy system considering cross-system failures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    6. Yongheng Luo & Zhonglong Li & Sen Li & Fei Jiang, 2023. "Risk Assessment for Energy Stations Based on Real-Time Equipment Failure Rates and Security Boundaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Mengyang Chen & Nan Li & Hailin Mu, 2024. "Assessing Risks on China’s Natural Gas Supply under Carbon Peaking Policies from Foreign–Domestic Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Yan Lu & Jing Xiang & Pengyun Geng & Huimin Zhang & Lili Liu & Haoran Wang & Jiajie Kong & Mingli Cui & Yan Li & Cheng Zhong & Tiantian Feng, 2023. "Coupling Mechanism and Synergic Development of Carbon Market and Electricity Market in the Region of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7525-:d:1278066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.