IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i16p5983-d1217589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research and Development of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycle for the Combined Production of Electricity and Hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Kindra

    (Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, Krasnokazarmennaya, 14, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey Rogalev

    (Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, Krasnokazarmennaya, 14, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Maksim Oparin

    (Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, Krasnokazarmennaya, 14, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Dmitriy Kovalev

    (Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, Krasnokazarmennaya, 14, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Mikhail Ostrovsky

    (Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, Krasnokazarmennaya, 14, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Modern trends in improving environmental safety have determined the urgency in creating innovative technologies that allow the production of electricity and hydrogen without the emission of harmful substances. However, at the moment, there are not so many technical solutions offering the combined production of these useful products with a high degree of efficiency and environmental friendliness. The transition to oxy-fuel combustion power cycles for the co-production of electricity and hydrogen is a prospective way to decrease carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere from the energy sector. To achieve zero emissions, the semi-closed oxy-fuel combustion cycle is combined with a steam methane reformer, which has a high energy efficiency through reducing losses in the steam turbine condenser. The modeling methodology has been described in detail, including the approaches to defining the working fluid properties and mathematical models of the different steam methane reforming plants and the oxy-fuel combustion power plant. According to the results of the thermodynamic analysis of the steam methane reforming plant, it was found that an increase in the temperature from 850 to 1000 °C leads to a decrease in the mass flow fuel by 16.3% due to the shift towards a direct reaction. Moreover, the optimal temperature in the reformer lies in the range of 900–950 °C. A comparison of the energetic and ecological characteristics of various steam methane reformer units showed that the scheme with oxy-fuel combustion is better compared to the scheme with CO 2 capture by absorption in monoethanolamine; the efficiency is 6.9% higher and emissions of carbon dioxide are 22 times lower. According to the results of the thermodynamic analysis of a novel oxy-fuel combustion power cycle, it was found that its performance varied regarding the range of electricity production (123.6–370 MW) and hydrogen production (0–10.8 kg/s). The efficiency of the oxy-fuel combustion power cycle varies in the range of 47.2–70.1%. Based on the results of the operation regimes analysis, the energy complex performance map has been developed, allowing identification of the efficiency and working fluid massflow by net power and produced hydrogen massflow.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Kindra & Andrey Rogalev & Maksim Oparin & Dmitriy Kovalev & Mikhail Ostrovsky, 2023. "Research and Development of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycle for the Combined Production of Electricity and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5983-:d:1217589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/16/5983/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/16/5983/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Teng & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2017. "Technology choice for reducing NOx emissions: An empirical study of Chinese power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 362-376.
    2. Descamps, C. & Bouallou, C. & Kanniche, M., 2008. "Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 874-881.
    3. Adele Atkinson & Flore-Anne Messy, 2012. "Measuring Financial Literacy: Results of the OECD / International Network on Financial Education (INFE) Pilot Study," OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions 15, OECD Publishing.
    4. Isabel Amez & David León & Alexander Ivannikov & Konstantin Kolikov & Blanca Castells, 2023. "Potential of CBM as an Energy Vector in Active Mines and Abandoned Mines in Russia and Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Dutta, Rohan & Nord, Lars O. & Bolland, Olav, 2017. "Selection and design of post-combustion CO2 capture process for 600 MW natural gas fueled thermal power plant based on operability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 643-656.
    6. Evgeny Lisin & Galina Kurdiukova & Pavel Okley & Veronika Chernova, 2019. "Efficient Methods of Market Pricing in Power Industry within the Context of System Integration of Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Zhang, Na & Lior, Noam, 2008. "Two novel oxy-fuel power cycles integrated with natural gas reforming and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 340-351.
    8. Alexandra Kopteva & Leonid Kalimullin & Pavel Tcvetkov & Amilcar Soares, 2021. "Prospects and Obstacles for Green Hydrogen Production in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimir Kindra & Igor Maksimov & Maksim Oparin & Olga Zlyvko & Andrey Rogalev, 2023. "Hydrogen Technologies: A Critical Review and Feasibility Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Yury Monakov & Alexander Tarasov & Alexander Ivannikov & Alexander Murzintsev & Nikita Shutenko, 2023. "Optimization of Equipment Operation in Power Systems Based on the Use in the Design of Frequency-Dependent Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Lin, Chien-An & Bates, Timothy C., 2022. "Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Roxana Hatos, 2021. "Graduates On Labour Market In Romania. Precarity Or Resilience?," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 21-28, September.
    5. József Banyár & Petra Turi, 2019. "The Evolution of the Insurance Consumer Protection Approach in Hungary," Public Finance Quarterly, State Audit Office of Hungary, vol. 64(2), pages 189-207.
    6. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Yaakov Itach, 2019. "Financial Literacy Level Of High School Students And Its Economic Patterns Reflections," Almanac of PhD Students, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, vol. 15(15 Year 2), pages 518-537.
    9. Fujiki, Hiroshi, 2020. "Cash demand and financial literacy: A case study using Japanese survey data," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Sasaki, Takashi & Suzuki, Tomoko & Akasaka, Yasufumi & Takaoka, Masaki, 2017. "Generation efficiency improvement of IGCC with CO2 capture by the application of the low temperature reactive shift catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 60-67.
    11. Marco Nieddu & Lorenzo Pandolfi, 2018. "Cutting Through the Fog: Financial Literacy and the Subjective Value of Financial Assets," CSEF Working Papers 497, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    12. Adrian Galapon & Nelson C. Bool, 2022. "Effects of financial literacy and financial behavior on the financial well-being of teachers in higher education institutions in Region 1, Philippines," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(9), pages 150-157, December.
    13. Lee, Jong Jun & Kim, Young Sik & Cha, Kyu Sang & Kim, Tong Seop & Sohn, Jeong L. & Joo, Yong Jin, 2009. "Influence of system integration options on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1788-1796, September.
    14. Kadoya, Yoshihiko & Khan, Mostafa Saidur Rahim, 2020. "What determines financial literacy in Japan?," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 353-371, July.
    15. Rajat Deb & Kanchan Kumar Nath & Mukesh Nepal & Sourav Chakraborty & Kiran Sankar Chakraborty, 2021. "Do People Choose Life Insurance for Protection or for Saving?," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 20(1), pages 35-44, June.
    16. Thomas F. Crossley & Tobias Schmidt & Panagiota Tzamourani & Joachim K. Winter, 2021. "Interviewer effects and the measurement of financial literacy," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 150-178, January.
    17. Julio César Garcia Martinez & Daniela Cruz Delgado & Estela Torres Ramírez, 2024. "Determinantes de la alfabetización financiera de los empleadores en México," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, Enero - M.
    18. Hiroshi Fujiki, 2019. "Who needs guidance from a financial adviser? Evidence from Japan," Working Papers on Central Bank Communication 011, University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Economics.
    19. Luo, Chending & Zhang, Na, 2012. "Zero CO2 emission SOLRGT power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 312-323.
    20. Farboud Khatami & Erfan Goharian, 2022. "Beyond Profitable Shifts to Green Energies, towards Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5983-:d:1217589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.