IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3463-d811731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Various Tree-Based Ensemble Models for Estimating Solar Energy Resource Potential in Different Climatic Zones of China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhigao Zhou

    (Shenzhen Longhua High School, Longhua District, Shenzhen 518109, China)

  • Aiwen Lin

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Lijie He

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Lunche Wang

    (Laboratory of Critical Zone Evolution, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic (PV) electricity generation is growing rapidly in China. Accurate estimation of solar energy resource potential ( R s ) is crucial for siting, designing, evaluating and optimizing PV systems. Seven types of tree-based ensemble models, including classification and regression trees (CART), extremely randomized trees (ET), random forest (RF), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting with categorical features support (CatBoost) and light gradient boosting method (LightGBM), as well as the multi-layer perceotron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM), were applied to estimate R s using a k-fold cross-validation method. The three newly developed models (CatBoost, LighGBM, XGBoost) and GBDT model generally outperformed the other five models with satisfactory accuracy (R 2 ranging from 0.893–0.916, RMSE ranging from 1.943–2.195 MJm −2 d −1 , and MAE ranging from 1.457–1.646 MJm −2 d −1 on average) and provided acceptable model stability (increasing the percentage in testing RMSE over training RMSE from 8.3% to 31.9%) under seven input combinations. In addition, the CatBoost (12.3 s), LightGBM (13.9 s), XGBoost (20.5 s) and GBDT (16.8 s) exhibited satisfactory computational efficiency compared with the MLP (132.1 s) and SVM (256.8 s). Comprehensively considering the model accuracy, stability and computational time, the newly developed tree-based models (CatBoost, LighGBM, XGBoost) and commonly used GBDT model were recommended for modeling R s in contrasting climates of China and possibly similar climatic zones elsewhere around the world. This study evaluated three newly developed tree-based ensemble models of estimating R s in various climates of China, from model accuracy, model stability and computational efficiency, which provides a new look at indicators of evaluating machine learning methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhigao Zhou & Aiwen Lin & Lijie He & Lunche Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Various Tree-Based Ensemble Models for Estimating Solar Energy Resource Potential in Different Climatic Zones of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3463-:d:811731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hassan, Muhammed A. & Khalil, A. & Kaseb, S. & Kassem, M.A., 2017. "Exploring the potential of tree-based ensemble methods in solar radiation modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 897-916.
    2. Vamvakas, Ioannis & Salamalikis, Vasileios & Kazantzidis, Andreas, 2020. "Evaluation of enhancement events of global horizontal irradiance due to clouds at Patras, South-West Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 764-771.
    3. Fan, Junliang & Chen, Baiquan & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Lu, Xianghui & Xiang, Youzhen, 2018. "Evaluation and development of temperature-based empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in humid regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 903-914.
    4. Zou, Ling & Wang, Lunche & Xia, Li & Lin, Aiwen & Hu, Bo & Zhu, Hongji, 2017. "Prediction and comparison of solar radiation using improved empirical models and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 343-353.
    5. Chen, Ji-Long & He, Lei & Yang, Hong & Ma, Maohua & Chen, Qiao & Wu, Sheng-Jun & Xiao, Zuo-lin, 2019. "Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-111.
    6. Yagli, Gokhan Mert & Yang, Dazhi & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2019. "Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 487-498.
    7. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    8. Deo, Ravinesh C. & Wen, Xiaohu & Qi, Feng, 2016. "A wavelet-coupled support vector machine model for forecasting global incident solar radiation using limited meteorological dataset," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 568-593.
    9. Voyant, Cyril & Motte, Fabrice & Notton, Gilles & Fouilloy, Alexis & Nivet, Marie-Laure & Duchaud, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Prediction intervals for global solar irradiation forecasting using regression trees methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 332-340.
    10. Zang, Haixiang & Cheng, Lilin & Ding, Tao & Cheung, Kwok W. & Wang, Miaomiao & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2019. "Estimation and validation of daily global solar radiation by day of the year-based models for different climates in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 984-1003.
    11. Almorox, J. & Hontoria, C. & Benito, M., 2011. "Models for obtaining daily global solar radiation with measured air temperature data in Madrid (Spain)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1703-1709, May.
    12. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    13. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Ma, Xin & Bai, Hua, 2019. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily and monthly mean daily diffuse horizontal solar radiation for different climatic regions of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 168-186.
    14. Kaba, Kazım & Sarıgül, Mehmet & Avcı, Mutlu & Kandırmaz, H. Mustafa, 2018. "Estimation of daily global solar radiation using deep learning model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 126-135.
    15. Feiyan Chen & Zhigao Zhou & Aiwen Lin & Jiqiang Niu & Wenmin Qin & Zhong Yang, 2019. "Evaluation of Direct Horizontal Irradiance in China Using a Physically-Based Model and Machine Learning Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Yadav, Amit Kumar & Chandel, S.S., 2015. "Solar energy potential assessment of western Himalayan Indian state of Himachal Pradesh using J48 algorithm of WEKA in ANN based prediction model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 675-693.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Yu & Hao, Weiping & Li, Haoru & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Gao, Lili, 2020. "Machine learning models to quantify and map daily global solar radiation and photovoltaic power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Zang, Haixiang & Cheng, Lilin & Ding, Tao & Cheung, Kwok W. & Wang, Miaomiao & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2020. "Application of functional deep belief network for estimating daily global solar radiation: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Yang, Liu & Cao, Qimeng & Yu, Ying & Liu, Yan, 2020. "Comparison of daily diffuse radiation models in regions of China without solar radiation measurement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Zang, Haixiang & Jiang, Xin & Cheng, LiLin & Zhang, Fengchun & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2022. "Combined empirical and machine learning modeling method for estimation of daily global solar radiation for general meteorological observation stations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 795-808.
    5. Evseev, Efim G. & Kudish, Avraham I., 2020. "The extent to which a correlation between global irradiation and temperature developed for a single site can be applied to nearby sites: A case study for Israel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 949-954.
    6. Lu, Yunbo & Wang, Lunche & Zhu, Canming & Zou, Ling & Zhang, Ming & Feng, Lan & Cao, Qian, 2023. "Predicting surface solar radiation using a hybrid radiative Transfer–Machine learning model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Liu, Yanfeng & Zhou, Yong & Chen, Yaowen & Wang, Dengjia & Wang, Yingying & Zhu, Ying, 2020. "Comparison of support vector machine and copula-based nonlinear quantile regression for estimating the daily diffuse solar radiation: A case study in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1101-1112.
    8. Olubayo M. Babatunde & Josiah L. Munda & Yskandar Hamam, 2020. "Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Neural Network Trained with Differential Evolution for Estimating Global Solar Radiation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Ahmed Aljanad & Nadia M. L. Tan & Vassilios G. Agelidis & Hussain Shareef, 2021. "Neural Network Approach for Global Solar Irradiance Prediction at Extremely Short-Time-Intervals Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Wu, Lifeng & Agathokleous, Evgenios & Liu, Chunwei & Zhang, Baozhong & Luo, Yufeng & Sun, Shanlei, 2022. "Modeling daily global solar radiation using only temperature data: Past, development, and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Guosheng Duan & Lifeng Wu & Fa Liu & Yicheng Wang & Shaofei Wu, 2022. "Improvement in Solar-Radiation Forecasting Based on Evolutionary KNEA Method and Numerical Weather Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Zang, Haixiang & Cheng, Lilin & Ding, Tao & Cheung, Kwok W. & Wang, Miaomiao & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2019. "Estimation and validation of daily global solar radiation by day of the year-based models for different climates in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 984-1003.
    13. Fan, Junliang & Ma, Xin & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Yu, Xiang & Zeng, Wenzhi, 2019. "Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    14. Ağbulut, Ümit & Gürel, Ali Etem & Biçen, Yunus, 2021. "Prediction of daily global solar radiation using different machine learning algorithms: Evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    16. Kisi, Ozgur & Heddam, Salim & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2019. "The implementation of univariable scheme-based air temperature for solar radiation prediction: New development of dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 184-195.
    17. Qin, Shujing & Liu, Zhihe & Qiu, Rangjian & Luo, Yufeng & Wu, Jingwei & Zhang, Baozhong & Wu, Lifeng & Agathokleous, Evgenios, 2023. "Short–term global solar radiation forecasting based on an improved method for sunshine duration prediction and public weather forecasts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    18. Prieto, Jesús-Ignacio & García, David, 2022. "Global solar radiation models: A critical review from the point of view of homogeneity and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    19. Hongchao Zhang & Tengteng Zhu, 2022. "Stacking Model for Photovoltaic-Power-Generation Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Peng, Tian & Zhang, Chu & Zhou, Jianzhong & Nazir, Muhammad Shahzad, 2021. "An integrated framework of Bi-directional long-short term memory (BiLSTM) based on sine cosine algorithm for hourly solar radiation forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3463-:d:811731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.