IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2555-d784596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latent-Space Dynamics for Prediction and Fault Detection in Geothermal Power Plant Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Yingxiang Liu

    (Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Wei Ling

    (Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Robert Young

    (Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Jalal Zia

    (Cyrq Energy Inc., Salt Lake City, UT 84101, USA)

  • Trenton T. Cladouhos

    (Cyrq Energy Inc., Salt Lake City, UT 84101, USA)

  • Behnam Jafarpour

    (Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

Abstract

This paper presents a latent-space dynamic neural network (LSDNN) model for the multi-step-ahead prediction and fault detection of a geothermal power plant’s operation. The model was trained to learn the dynamics of the power generation process from multivariate time-series data and the effects of exogenous variables, such as control adjustment and ambient temperature. In the LSDNN model, an encoder–decoder architecture was designed to capture cross-correlation among different measured variables. In addition, a latent space dynamic structure was proposed to propagate the dynamics in the latent space to enable prediction. The prediction power of the LSDNN was utilized for monitoring a geothermal power plant and detecting abnormal events. The model was integrated with principal component analysis (PCA)-based process monitoring techniques to develop a fault-detection procedure. The performance of the proposed LSDNN model and fault detection approach was demonstrated using field data collected from a geothermal power plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingxiang Liu & Wei Ling & Robert Young & Jalal Zia & Trenton T. Cladouhos & Behnam Jafarpour, 2022. "Latent-Space Dynamics for Prediction and Fault Detection in Geothermal Power Plant Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2555-:d:784596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Paci, Marco, 2013. "An Organic Rankine Cycle off-design model for the search of the optimal control strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 97-106.
    2. Leva, S. & Dolara, A. & Grimaccia, F. & Mussetta, M. & Ogliari, E., 2017. "Analysis and validation of 24 hours ahead neural network forecasting of photovoltaic output power," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 88-100.
    3. Imran, Muhammad & Pili, Roberto & Usman, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and control strategies of organic Rankine cycle systems: Methods and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heberle, Florian & Hofer, Markus & Ürlings, Nicolas & Schröder, Hartwig & Anderlohr, Thomas & Brüggemann, Dieter, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of a solar thermal retrofit for an air-cooled geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 494-502.
    2. Tailu Li & Zeyu Wang & Jingyi Wang & Xiang Gao, 2023. "Dynamic Performance of Organic Rankine Cycle Driven by Fluctuant Industrial Waste Heat for Building Power Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Osman Özkaraca & Pınar Keçebaş & Cihan Demircan & Ali Keçebaş, 2017. "Thermodynamic Optimization of a Geothermal- Based Organic Rankine Cycle System Using an Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Yodha Y. Nusiaputra & Hans-Joachim Wiemer & Dietmar Kuhn, 2014. "Thermal-Economic Modularization of Small, Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plants for Mid-Enthalpy Geothermal Fields," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Capra, Federico & Martelli, Emanuele, 2015. "Numerical optimization of combined heat and power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part B: Simultaneous design & part-load optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 329-343.
    6. Vaupel, Yannic & Huster, Wolfgang R. & Mhamdi, Adel & Mitsos, Alexander, 2021. "Optimal operating policies for organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery under transient conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    8. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    9. Javier López Gómez & Ana Ogando Martínez & Francisco Troncoso Pastoriza & Lara Febrero Garrido & Enrique Granada Álvarez & José Antonio Orosa García, 2020. "Photovoltaic Power Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks and Numerical Weather Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Xia, Xiaoxia & Liu, Zhipeng & Wang, Zhiqi & Sun, Tong & Zhang, Hualong & Zhang, Sifeng, 2023. "Thermo-economic-environmental optimization design of dual-loop organic Rankine cycle under fluctuating heat source temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Stijepovic, Mirko Z. & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Linke, Patrick & Grujic, Aleksandar S. & Seferlis, Panos, 2014. "An exergy composite curves approach for the design of optimum multi-pressure organic Rankine cycle processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 285-298.
    12. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2019. "Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 716-731.
    13. Wang, Xiaoyang & Sun, Yunlin & Luo, Duo & Peng, Jinqing, 2022. "Comparative study of machine learning approaches for predicting short-term photovoltaic power output based on weather type classification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Ajith, Meenu & Martínez-Ramón, Manel, 2023. "Deep learning algorithms for very short term solar irradiance forecasting: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Andrea Aquino & Pietro Poesio, 2021. "Off-Design Exergy Analysis of Convective Drying Using a Two-Phase Multispecies Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-36, January.
    16. Alessandro Niccolai & Seyedamir Orooji & Andrea Matteri & Emanuele Ogliari & Sonia Leva, 2022. "Irradiance Nowcasting by Means of Deep-Learning Analysis of Infrared Images," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, March.
    17. Ben-Ran Fu & Sung-Wei Hsu & Yuh-Ren Lee & Jui-Ching Hsieh & Chia-Ming Chang & Chih-Hsi Liu, 2014. "Performance of a 250 kW Organic Rankine Cycle System for Off-Design Heat Source Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Li, Zhi & Wang, Lei & Jiang, Ruicheng & Wang, Bingzheng & Yu, Xiaonan & Huang, Rui & Yu, Xiaoli, 2022. "Experimental investigations on dynamic performance of organic Rankine cycle integrated with latent thermal energy storage under transient engine conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    19. Yagli, Gokhan Mert & Yang, Dazhi & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2019. "Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 487-498.
    20. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2555-:d:784596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.