IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2475-d781243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refueling of LH2 Aircraft—Assessment of Turnaround Procedures and Aircraft Design Implication

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Mangold

    (Institute of Aircraft Design, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Daniel Silberhorn

    (Institute of System Architectures in Aeronautics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), 21129 Hamburg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nicolas Moebs

    (Institute of Aircraft Design, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Niclas Dzikus

    (Institute of System Architectures in Aeronautics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), 21129 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Julian Hoelzen

    (Institute of Electric Power Systems, Leibniz University Hanover, 30167 Hanover, Germany)

  • Thomas Zill

    (Institute of System Architectures in Aeronautics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), 21129 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Andreas Strohmayer

    (Institute of Aircraft Design, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Green liquid hydrogen (LH2) could play an essential role as a zero-carbon aircraft fuel to reach long-term sustainable aviation. Excluding challenges such as electrolysis, transportation and use of renewable energy in setting up hydrogen (H 2 ) fuel infrastructure, this paper investigates the interface between refueling systems and aircraft, and the impacts on fuel distribution at the airport. Furthermore, it provides an overview of key technology design decisions for LH2 refueling procedures and their effects on the turnaround times as well as on aircraft design. Based on a comparison to Jet A-1 refueling, new LH2 refueling procedures are described and evaluated. Process steps under consideration are connecting/disconnecting, purging, chill-down, and refueling. The actual refueling flow of LH2 is limited to a simplified Reynolds term of v · d = 2.35 m 2 /s. A mass flow rate of 20 kg/s is reached with an inner hose diameter of 152.4 mm. The previous and subsequent processes (without refueling) require 9 min with purging and 6 min without purging. For the assessment of impacts on LH2 aircraft operation, process changes on the level of ground support equipment are compared to current procedures with Jet A-1. The technical challenges at the airport for refueling trucks as well as pipeline systems and dispensers are presented. In addition to the technological solutions, explosion protection as applicable safety regulations are analyzed, and the overall refueling process is validated. The thermodynamic properties of LH2 as a real, compressible fluid are considered to derive implications for airport-side infrastructure. The advantages and disadvantages of a subcooled liquid are evaluated, and cost impacts are elaborated. Behind the airport storage tank, LH2 must be cooled to at least 19K to prevent two-phase phenomena and a mass flow reduction during distribution. Implications on LH2 aircraft design are investigated by understanding the thermodynamic properties, including calculation methods for the aircraft tank volume, and problems such as cavitation and two-phase flows. In conclusion, the work presented shows that LH2 refueling procedure is feasible, compliant with the applicable explosion protection standards and hence does not impact the turnaround procedure. A turnaround time comparison shows that refueling with LH2 in most cases takes less time than with Jet A-1. The turnaround at the airport can be performed by a fuel truck or a pipeline dispenser system without generating direct losses, i.e., venting to the atmosphere.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Mangold & Daniel Silberhorn & Nicolas Moebs & Niclas Dzikus & Julian Hoelzen & Thomas Zill & Andreas Strohmayer, 2022. "Refueling of LH2 Aircraft—Assessment of Turnaround Procedures and Aircraft Design Implication," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-41, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2475-:d:781243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2475/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2475/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Winnefeld & Thomas Kadyk & Boris Bensmann & Ulrike Krewer & Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach, 2018. "Modelling and Designing Cryogenic Hydrogen Tanks for Future Aircraft Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daehoon Kang & Sungho Yun & Bo-kyong Kim & Jaewon Kim & Gildong Kim & Hyunbae Lee & Sangyeol Choi, 2022. "Numerical Investigation of the Initial Charging Process of the Liquid Hydrogen Tank for Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Yue Gu & Mirjam Wiedemann & Tim Ryley & Mary E. Johnson & Michael John Evans, 2023. "Hydrogen-Powered Aircraft at Airports: A Review of the Infrastructure Requirements and Planning Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maršenka Marksel & Anita Prapotnik Brdnik, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Direct Operating Costs: Conventional vs. Hydrogen Fuel Cell 19-Seat Aircraft," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Pavlos Rompokos & Sajal Kissoon & Ioannis Roumeliotis & Devaiah Nalianda & Theoklis Nikolaidis & Andrew Rolt, 2020. "Liquefied Natural Gas for Civil Aviation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Collins, Jeffrey M. & McLarty, Dustin, 2020. "All-electric commercial aviation with solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine-battery hybrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Tobias Mueller & Steven Gronau, 2023. "Fostering Macroeconomic Research on Hydrogen-Powered Aviation: A Systematic Literature Review on General Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, February.
    5. Thomas Kadyk & Christopher Winnefeld & Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach & Ulrike Krewer, 2018. "Analysis and Design of Fuel Cell Systems for Aviation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Andriy Chaban & Zbigniew Lukasik & Marek Lis & Andrzej Szafraniec, 2020. "Mathematical Modeling of Transient Processes in Magnetic Suspension of Maglev Trains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Yuanliang Liu & Yinan Qiu & Zhan Liu & Gang Lei, 2022. "Modeling and Analysis of the Flow Characteristics of Liquid Hydrogen in a Pipe Suffering from External Transient Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    8. J.-K. Mueller & A. Bensmann & B. Bensmann & T. Fischer & T. Kadyk & G. Narjes & F. Kauth & B. Ponick & J. R. Seume & U. Krewer & R. Hanke-Rauschenbach & A. Mertens, 2018. "Design Considerations for the Electrical Power Supply of Future Civil Aircraft with Active High-Lift Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Maršenka Marksel & Anita Prapotnik Brdnik, 2022. "Maximum Take-Off Mass Estimation of a 19-Seat Fuel Cell Aircraft Consuming Liquid Hydrogen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Jac Clarke & Wulf Dettmer & Jennifer Wen & Zhaoxin Ren, 2023. "Cryogenic Hydrogen Jet and Flame for Clean Energy Applications: Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-40, May.
    11. Mathieu Baudy & Olivier Rondeau & Amine Jaafar & Christophe Turpin & Sofyane Abbou & Mélanie Grignon, 2022. "Voltage Readjustment Methodology According to Pressure and Temperature Applied to a High Temperature PEM Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Katalenich, Scott M. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2022. "Toward battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell military vehicles for land, air, and sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2475-:d:781243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.