IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i2p622-d726098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Analysis of the Pollutant Characteristics of Gasoline Vehicle Emissions under Different Engine, Fuel, and Test Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Zongyan Lv

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Lei Yang

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Lin Wu

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Jianfei Peng

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Qijun Zhang

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Meng Sun

    (Tianjin Eco-Environmental Monitoring Center, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Hongjun Mao

    (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Jie Min

    (Tianjin SwARC Automotive Research Laboratory Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

Vehicle exhaust emissions have seriously affected air quality and human health, and understanding the emission characteristics of vehicle pollutants can promote emission reductions. In this study, a chassis dynamometer was used to study the emission characteristics of the pollutants of two gasoline vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) when using six kinds of fuels. The results show that the two tested vehicles had different engine performance under the same test conditions, which led to a significant difference in their emission characteristics. The fuel consumption and pollutant emission factors of the WLTC cycle were higher than those of the NEDC. The research octane number (RON) and ethanol content of fuels have significant effects on pollutant emissions. For the Euro 5 vehicle, CO and particle number (PN) emissions decreased under the WLTC cycle, and NOx emissions decreased with increasing RONs. For the Euro 6 vehicle, CO and NOx emissions decreased and PN emissions increased with increasing RONs. Compared with traditional gasoline, ethanol gasoline (E10) led to decreases in NOx and PN emissions, and increased CO emissions for the Euro 5 vehicle, while it led to higher PN and NOx emissions and lower CO emissions for the Euro 6 vehicle. In addition, the particulate matter emitted was mainly nucleation-mode particulate matter, accounting for more than 70%. There were two peaks in the particle size distribution, which were about 18 nm and 40 nm, respectively. Finally, compared with ethanol–gasoline, gasoline vehicles with high emission standards (Euro 6) are more suitable for the use of traditional gasoline with a high RON.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongyan Lv & Lei Yang & Lin Wu & Jianfei Peng & Qijun Zhang & Meng Sun & Hongjun Mao & Jie Min, 2022. "Comprehensive Analysis of the Pollutant Characteristics of Gasoline Vehicle Emissions under Different Engine, Fuel, and Test Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:622-:d:726098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ru-Jin Huang & Yanlin Zhang & Carlo Bozzetti & Kin-Fai Ho & Jun-Ji Cao & Yongming Han & Kaspar R. Daellenbach & Jay G. Slowik & Stephen M. Platt & Francesco Canonaco & Peter Zotter & Robert Wolf & Sim, 2014. "High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7521), pages 218-222, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Li & Baoli Gong & Yong Peng & Jin Nie & Zheng Wang & Yiqi Chen & Guoquan Xie & Kui Wang & Honghao Zhang, 2023. "Analysis and Comparative Study of Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Operations and Energy-Emission Characteristics Based on Real Vehicle Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Janusz Adamczyk & Maciej Dzikuć & Robert Dylewski & Erica Varese, 2024. "Assessment of selected environmental and economic factors for the development of electro-mobility in Poland," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2199-2223, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Wenxiao & Lin, Chen & Chen, Wei & Hong, Jinglan & Chang, Jingcai & Dong, Yong & Zhang, Yanlu, 2017. "Environmental effect of current desulfurization technology on fly dust emission in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Yi Yang & Jie Li & Guobin Zhu & Qiangqiang Yuan, 2019. "Spatio–Temporal Relationship and Evolvement of Socioeconomic Factors and PM 2.5 in China During 1998–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Lili Guo & Yuting Song & Mengqian Tang & Jinyang Tang & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Mengying Su & Houjian Li, 2022. "Assessing the Relationship among Land Transfer, Fertilizer Usage, and PM 2.5 Pollution: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Yu Zhang & Jiayu Wu & Chunyao Zhou & Qingyu Zhang, 2019. "Installation Planning in Regional Thermal Power Industry for Emissions Reduction Based on an Emissions Inventory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Ruiqing Ma & Yeyue Zhang & Yini Zhang & Xi Li & Zheng Ji, 2023. "The Relationship between the Transmission of Different SARS-CoV-2 Strains and Air Quality: A Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Jie Yang & Pengfei Liu & Hongquan Song & Changhong Miao & Feng Wang & Yu Xing & Wenjie Wang & Xinyu Liu & Mengxin Zhao, 2021. "Effects of Anthropogenic Emissions from Different Sectors on PM 2.5 Concentrations in Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Kun Liu & Xuemin Liu & Zihao Wu, 2024. "Nexus between Corporate Digital Transformation and Green Technological Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Optimizing Resource Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Diyi Liu & Kun Cheng & Kevin Huang & Hui Ding & Tiantong Xu & Zhenni Chen & Yanqi Sun, 2022. "Visualization and Analysis of Air Pollution and Human Health Based on Cluster Analysis: A Bibliometric Review from 2001 to 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Deguang Li & Zhicheng Ding & Jianghuan Liu & Qiurui He & Hamad Naeem, 2022. "Exploring Spatiotemporal Dynamics of PM 2.5 Emission Based on Nighttime Light in China from 2012 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Aboubakar Gasirabo & Chen Xi & Baligira R. Hamad & Umwali Dufatanye Edovia, 2023. "A CA–Markov-Based Simulation and Prediction of LULC Changes over the Nyabarongo River Basin, Rwanda," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Xuan Sun & Wenting Yang & Tao Sun & Ya Ping Wang, 2018. "Negative Emotion under Haze: An Investigation Based on the Microblog and Weather Records of Tianjin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Guangzhi Qi & Zhibao Wang & Zhixiu Wang & Lijie Wei, 2022. "Has Industrial Upgrading Improved Air Pollution?—Evidence from China’s Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Mao Mao & Xiaolin Zhang & Yan Yin, 2018. "Particulate Matter and Gaseous Pollutions in Three Metropolises along the Chinese Yangtze River: Situation and Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, May.
    14. Yucong Miao & Shuhua Liu & Li Sheng & Shunxiang Huang & Jian Li, 2019. "Influence of Boundary Layer Structure and Low-Level Jet on PM 2.5 Pollution in Beijing: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Fan, Maoyong & Jiang, Hanchen & Zhou, Maigeng, 2023. "Beyond particulate matter: New evidence on the causal effects of air pollution on mortality," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Deepika Bhattu & Sachchida Nand Tripathi & Himadri Sekhar Bhowmik & Vaios Moschos & Chuan Ping Lee & Martin Rauber & Gary Salazar & Gülcin Abbaszade & Tianqu Cui & Jay G. Slowik & Pawan Vats & Suneeti, 2024. "Local incomplete combustion emissions define the PM2.5 oxidative potential in Northern India," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Xinbo Huang & Shang Xie, 2024. "Can a Driving Restriction Policy Improve Air Quality? Empirical Evidence from Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Shiyuan Ding & Yingying Chen & Qinkai Li & Xiao-Dong Li, 2022. "Using Stable Sulfur Isotope to Trace Sulfur Oxidation Pathways during the Winter of 2017–2019 in Tianjin, North China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.
    19. Dongsheng Zhan & Mei-Po Kwan & Wenzhong Zhang & Shaojian Wang & Jianhui Yu, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Variations and Driving Factors of Air Pollution in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Tao Chen & Jun He & Xiaowei Lu & Jiangfeng She & Zhongqing Guan, 2016. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of PM 2.5 and Its Relation to Meteorological Factors in the Urban Area of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:622-:d:726098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.