IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i24p9549-d1005426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Affordability between Battery-Supported Electric Cooking and Conventional Cooking Fuel

Author

Listed:
  • Shafiqa Keddar

    (Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Scott Strachan

    (Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Stuart Galloway

    (Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

Abstract

Cooking with electricity (eCook) in low-and-middle-income developing countries is still an expensive option compared to using conventional fuels such as charcoal and firewood, so there is a need to identify solutions to make it affordable for all in line with the targets of SDG7. The initial aim of this paper is to understand and provide a comparative analysis of the cooking energy costs through a range of contextualized cooking scenarios—when cooking either with conventional fuels (e.g., charcoal, firewood) or with eCook appliances (e.g., electric pressure cookers (EPC) or hotplates), that are connected to and supplied from an integrated or portable battery (eCook battery). The cooking cost for the eCook cooking scenarios is assessed with and without fuel stacking where a degree of eCook exists alongside other conventional fuels. These studies offer a more realistic concept of the cooking practice to characterize the best fit for cooking scenarios and the main factors required to close the gap between the energy cost of conventional fuel and eCook batteries. The results suggest that to close the affordability gap between firewood and battery-based eCook, three main factors must be considered when estimating the cooking cost: the non-market cost of firewood; ensuring a low mini-grid tariff that is within range of the national grid tariff; and using an optimal eCook battery size with the capability to meet the required demand. In fact, when taking these factors into account; for the 2022 analysis, cooking 100% using an eCook battery is in a range of USD 29–30/month implying that there could be an opportunity for parity when the firewood cost reaches USD 29/month. The same applies to the cooking prediction costs for 2030, reducing further to USD 20–21/month. However, if the firewood is harvested sustainably, ensuring it is high in quality and dry, it would be difficult for battery eCook to compete. It should be emphasized that this research has relevance for governments, practitioners, and researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shafiqa Keddar & Scott Strachan & Stuart Galloway, 2022. "Bridging the Affordability between Battery-Supported Electric Cooking and Conventional Cooking Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9549-:d:1005426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muriithi, Moses K. & Mutegi, Reuben G. & Mwabu, Germano, 2020. "Counting unpaid work in Kenya: Gender and age profiles of hours worked and imputed wage incomes," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    2. Robert Van Buskirk & Lawrence Kachione & Gilbert Robert & Rachel Kanyerere & Christina Gilbert & James Majoni, 2021. "How to Make Off-Grid Solar Electric Cooking Cheaper Than Wood-Based Cooking," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. McKenna, Eoghan & Thomson, Murray, 2016. "High-resolution stochastic integrated thermal–electrical domestic demand model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 445-461.
    4. Shafiqa Keddar & Scott Strachan & Bartosz Soltowski & Stuart Galloway, 2021. "An Overview of the Technical Challenges Facing the Deployment of Electric Cooking on Hybrid PV/Diesel Mini-Grid in Rural Tanzania—A Case Study Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Simon Batchelor & Ed Brown & Nigel Scott & Jon Leary, 2019. "Two Birds, One Stone—Reframing Cooking Energy Policies in Africa and Asia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Batchelor & Ed Brown & Nigel Scott & Matthew Leach & Anna Clements & Jon Leary, 2022. "Mutual Support—Modern Energy Planning Inclusive of Cooking—A Review of Research into Action in Africa and Asia since 2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Constantinos Vassiliades & Ogheneruona Endurance Diemuodeke & Eric Boachie Yiadom & Ravita D. Prasad & Wassim Dbouk, 2022. "Policy Pathways for Mapping Clean Energy Access for Cooking in the Global South—A Case for Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Shafiqa Keddar & Scott Strachan & Stuart Galloway, 2022. "A Smart eCook Battery-Charging System to Maximize Electric Cooking Capacity on a Hybrid PV/Diesel Mini-Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Shafiqa Keddar & Scott Strachan & Bartosz Soltowski & Stuart Galloway, 2021. "An Overview of the Technical Challenges Facing the Deployment of Electric Cooking on Hybrid PV/Diesel Mini-Grid in Rural Tanzania—A Case Study Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Olabisi, Michael & Richardson, Robert B., 2022. "Why the poor pay higher energy prices: Evidence from Tanzania," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    6. Yang, Ting & Zhao, Liyuan & Li, Wei & Zomaya, Albert Y., 2021. "Dynamic energy dispatch strategy for integrated energy system based on improved deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Yunusov, Timur & Torriti, Jacopo, 2021. "Distributional effects of Time of Use tariffs based on electricity demand and time use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Lombardi, Francesco & Balderrama, Sergio & Quoilin, Sylvain & Colombo, Emanuela, 2019. "Generating high-resolution multi-energy load profiles for remote areas with an open-source stochastic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 433-444.
    9. Fuentes, E. & Arce, L. & Salom, J., 2018. "A review of domestic hot water consumption profiles for application in systems and buildings energy performance analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1530-1547.
    10. Robert Van Buskirk & Lawrence Kachione & Gilbert Robert & Rachel Kanyerere & Christina Gilbert & James Majoni, 2021. "How to Make Off-Grid Solar Electric Cooking Cheaper Than Wood-Based Cooking," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Abdullah M. Alabdullatif & Enrico H. Gerding & Alvaro Perez-Diaz, 2020. "Market Design and Trading Strategies for Community Energy Markets with Storage and Renewable Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-31, February.
    12. Zhao, Liyuan & Yang, Ting & Li, Wei & Zomaya, Albert Y., 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning-based joint load scheduling for household multi-energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    13. Ali Arababadi & Stephan Leyer & Joachim Hansen & Reza Arababadi, 2021. "Characterizing the Theory of Spreading Electric Vehicles in Luxembourg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Angreine Kewo & Pinrolinvic D. K. Manembu & Per Sieverts Nielsen, 2020. "Synthesising Residential Electricity Load Profiles at the City Level Using a Weighted Proportion (Wepro) Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    15. Mohsen Sharifi & Amin Kouti & Evi Lambie & Yixiao Ma & Maria Fernandez Boneta & Mohammad Haris Shamsi, 2023. "A Comprehensive Framework for Data-Driven Building End-Use Assessment Utilizing Monitored Operational Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    17. Collen Zalengera & Long Seng To & Richard Sieff & Alison Mohr & Aran Eales & Jon Cloke & Hannah Buckland & Ed Brown & Richard Blanchard & Simon Batchelor, 2020. "Decentralization: the key to accelerating access to distributed energy services in sub-Saharan Africa?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(3), pages 270-289, September.
    18. Anderson, Ben & Torriti, Jacopo, 2018. "Explaining shifts in UK electricity demand using time use data from 1974 to 2014," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 544-557.
    19. Mustafa E. Amiryar & Keith R. Pullen, 2019. "Assessment of the Carbon and Cost Savings of a Combined Diesel Generator, Solar Photovoltaic, and Flywheel Energy Storage Islanded Grid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Durillon, Benoit & Salomez, Florentin & Davigny, Arnaud & Kazmierczak, Sabine & Barry, Hervé & Saudemont, Christophe & Robyns, Benoît, 2021. "Consumers’ sensitivities and preferences modelling and integration in a decentralised two levels energy supervisor," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 142-157.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9549-:d:1005426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.