IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6669-d913138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Different Types of Automated Vehicles on Traffic Flow Characteristics and Emissions: A Microscopic Traffic Simulation of Different Freeway Segments

Author

Listed:
  • Abebe Dress Beza

    (Faculty of Civil and Water Resources Engineering, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 26, Ethiopia
    Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, B-7000 Mons, Belgium)

  • Mohammad Maghrour Zefreh

    (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Transport Planning, Brinellvägen 23, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Adam Torok

    (Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
    Department of Transport Policy and Economics, KTI–Institute for Transport Sciences, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Different types of automated vehicles (AVs) have emerged promptly in recent years, each of which might have different potential impacts on traffic flow and emissions. In this paper, the impacts of autonomous automated vehicles (AAVs) and cooperative automated vehicles (CAVs) on capacity, average traffic speed, average travel time per vehicle, and average delay per vehicle, as well as traffic emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), and particulate matter (PM 10 ) have been investigated through a microsimulation study in VISSIM. Moreover, the moderating effects of different AV market penetration, and different freeway segments on AV’s impacts have been studied. The simulation results show that CAVs have a higher impact on capacity improvement regardless of the type of freeway segment. Compared to other scenarios, CAVs at 100% market penetration in basic freeway segments have a greater capacity improvement than AAVs. Furthermore, merging, diverging, and weaving segments showed a moderating effect on capacity improvements, particularly on CAVs’ impact, with merging and weaving having the highest moderating effect on CAVs’ capacity improvement potential. Taking average delay per vehicle, average traffic speed, and average travel time per vehicle into account, simulation results were diverse across the investigated scenarios. The emission estimation results show that 100% AAV scenarios had the best performance in emission reductions in basic freeway and merging sections, while other scenarios increased emissions in diverging and weaving sections.

Suggested Citation

  • Abebe Dress Beza & Mohammad Maghrour Zefreh & Adam Torok, 2022. "Impacts of Different Types of Automated Vehicles on Traffic Flow Characteristics and Emissions: A Microscopic Traffic Simulation of Different Freeway Segments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6669-:d:913138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Obaid & Arpad Torok & Jairo Ortega, 2021. "A Comprehensive Emissions Model Combining Autonomous Vehicles with Park and Ride and Electric Vehicle Transportation Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Wadud, Zia & MacKenzie, Don & Leiby, Paul, 2016. "Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-18.
    3. Zhu, H.B. & Zhou, Y.J. & Wu, W.J., 2020. "Modeling traffic flow mixed with automated vehicles considering drivers ’ character difference," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    4. Aleksandra Deluka Tibljaš & Tullio Giuffrè & Sanja Surdonja & Salvatore Trubia, 2018. "Introduction of Autonomous Vehicles: Roundabouts Design and Safety Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Ye, Lanhang & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki, 2018. "Modeling connected and autonomous vehicles in heterogeneous traffic flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 269-277.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuriy Royko & Yevhen Fornalchyk & Eugeniusz Koda & Ivan Kernytskyy & Oleh Hrytsun & Romana Bura & Piotr Osinski & Anna Markiewicz & Tomasz Wierzbicki & Ruslan Barabash & Ruslan Humenuyk & Pavlo Polyan, 2023. "Public Transport Prioritization and Descriptive Criteria-Based Urban Sections Classification on Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Maksymilian Mądziel & Tiziana Campisi, 2023. "Investigation of Vehicular Pollutant Emissions at 4-Arm Intersections for the Improvement of Integrated Actions in the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2023. "Vehicle Emission Models and Traffic Simulators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2023. "Future Cities Carbon Emission Models: Hybrid Vehicle Emission Modelling for Low-Emission Zones," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Almlöf, Erik & Nybacka, Mikael & Pernestål, Anna & Jenelius, Erik, 2022. "Will leisure trips be more affected than work trips by autonomous technology? Modelling self-driving public transport and cars in Stockholm, Sweden," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-19.
    2. Guangyang Hou, 2023. "Evaluating Efficiency and Safety of Mixed Traffic with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Adverse Weather," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Marcos Medina-Tapia & Francesc Robusté, 2019. "Implementation of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Cities Could Have Neutral Effects on the Total Travel Time Costs: Modeling and Analysis for a Circular City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Gu, Yewen & Goez, Julio C. & Mario, Guajardo & Wallace, Stein W., 2019. "Autonomous vessels: State of the art and potential opportunities in logistics," Discussion Papers 2019/6, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    5. Muhammad Azam & Sitti Asmah Hassan & Othman Che Puan, 2022. "Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Conditions—A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-34, August.
    6. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2023. "Vehicle Emission Models and Traffic Simulators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, May.
    7. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Dubey, Subodh & Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Cats, Oded & Bansal, Prateek, 2022. "A General Framework to Forecast the Adoption of Novel Products: A Case of Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 63-95.
    9. Dulebenets, Maxim A. & Ozguven, Eren Erman & Moses, Ren, 2018. "The Highway Beautification Act: Towards improving efficiency of the Federal Outdoor Advertising Control Program," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 88-106.
    10. Pernestål Brenden , Anna & Kristoffersson , Ida, 2018. "Effects of driverless vehicles: A review of simulations," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:11, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    11. Jia Guo & Yusak Susilo & Constantinos Antoniou & Anna Pernestål Brenden, 2020. "Influence of Individual Perceptions on the Decision to Adopt Automated Bus Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Li, Dun & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2022. "Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 120-135.
    13. Raphael Hoerler & Fabian Haerri & Merja Hoppe, 2019. "New Solutions in Sustainable Commuting—The Attitudes and Experience of European Stakeholders and Experts in Switzerland," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Shelly Etzioni & Jamil Hamadneh & Arnór B. Elvarsson & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss & Milena Djukanovic & Stelios N. Neophytou & Jaka Sodnik & Amalia Polydoropoulou & Ioannis Tsouros & Cristina Pronello & N, 2020. "Modeling Cross-National Differences in Automated Vehicle Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Emberger, Guenter & Pfaffenbichler, Paul, 2020. "A quantitative analysis of potential impacts of automated vehicles in Austria using a dynamic integrated land use and transport interaction model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 57-67.
    16. Bray, Garrett & Cebon, David, 2022. "Operational speed strategy opportunities for autonomous trucking on highways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 75-94.
    17. Pi, Dawei & Xue, Pengyu & Wang, Weihua & Xie, Boyuan & Wang, Hongliang & Wang, Xianhui & Yin, Guodong, 2023. "Automotive platoon energy-saving: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    18. Meyer, Jonas & Becker, Henrik & Bösch, Patrick M. & Axhausen, Kay W., 2017. "Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 80-91.
    19. Moneim Massar & Imran Reza & Syed Masiur Rahman & Sheikh Muhammad Habib Abdullah & Arshad Jamal & Fahad Saleh Al-Ismail, 2021. "Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles on Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Positive or Negative?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Zeng, Junwei & Qian, Yongsheng & Li, Jiao & Zhang, Yongzhi & Xu, Dejie, 2023. "Congestion and energy consumption of heterogeneous traffic flow mixed with intelligent connected vehicles and platoons," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6669-:d:913138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.